ITDP India

Promoting sustainable and equitable transportation worldwide

Low emission zones: A roadmap to cleaner air in India

by

As published in IDR Online

Air pollution has escalated from an environmental issue into a full-blown health crisis, impacting people of all ages. Its far-reaching effects are evident in the rising cases of respiratory disorders, chronic illnesses, and even increased mortality.  

In North India, stubble burning, especially during the cooler months, is often considered to be the leading cause of air pollution. However, data indicates that year-round vehicular emissions are a more significant contributor to air pollution than stubble burning, construction, or firecrackers. According to the Emissions Inventory (2020), vehicles accounted for 46 percent of total PM2.5 emissions—harmful to human health—in Pune as well. Vehicles were also the largest source of harmful gaseous pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (73 percent) and carbon monoxide (66 percent). Between 2012 and 2019, PM2.5 emissions from transport in Pune surged by 91 percent, driven by rapid vehicle growth and the widespread use of highly polluting vehicle models.

Cleaner vehicle technology is not enough

To reduce emissions from vehicle tailpipes, the central government introduced Bharat Stage (BS)-VI standards in 2020 for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, which run on fuels such as petrol, diesel, and CNG. These standards set limits on pollutants that vehicles are allowed to emit per kilometre. At the same time, schemes such as FAME India, along with various state and city initiatives, actively promote the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs).

However, ICE vehicles currently outnumber EVs on the road, nullifying any gains in emissions reductions from the latter. What’s more, there continue to be far too many pre BS–VI vehicles in circulation to make any real dent in vehicular pollution. A case in point is a 2023 study conducted by Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) India and International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). The study found that approximately 70 percent of the vehicles plying in Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad are pre-BS or BS-I to -IV, all of which are more polluting than BS-VI vehicles. Estimates show that one pre-BS car pollutes as much as 11 BS-VI cars, while one pre-BS truck pollutes as much as 14 BS-VI trucks.

To further complicate matters, a real-world vehicular emission study in Delhi and Gurugram revealed that BS-VI vehicles also exceed approved laboratory limits. Additionally, emission levels varied by vehicle type. For instance, BS-VI taxis and light goods vehicle fleets emitted 2.4 and 5 times more nitrogen oxides, respectively, compared to BS-VI cars used for personal purposes.

The long-standing mandate for Pollution Under Control (PUC) certification also falls short. The test is ineffective because it does not measure PM and nitrogen oxide emissions, testing only for carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and smoke. Furthermore, PUC assesses pollutants when the vehicle is stationary, not when it is in actual use. Hence, PUC certificates are not reliable indicators of a vehicle’s fitness with regard to its real-time driving emissions.

Low emission zones could be the answer

While encouraging cleaner vehicle technology is one part of the solution, there is also a need to simultaneously restrict the use of highly polluting vehicles.

Low emission zones (LEZs) are designated zones in a city where the use of polluting vehicles is restricted or discouraged. Such zoning aims to improve local air quality and health by reducing vehicle tailpipe emissions. Many cities—including London, Seoul, Paris, Lima, Brussels, and Beijing—have implemented LEZs. 

Cities typically make policies regarding which categories of polluting vehicles to restrict and where to impose these restrictions. Once an area is identified, signages and road markings are mounted to let drivers know that they are entering an LEZ. The rules are enforced by automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras that read a vehicle’s number plate and identify whether it’s compliant or not. Cities like Paris mandate that every vehicle should have a sticker indicating their emission standard (Crit’Air sticker). In addition to these technologies, traditional traffic wardens visually identify violators as well.

But can LEZs be a silver bullet for vehicular pollution? Data from their implementation in London suggests they can in fact provide relief.

London’s LEZ—launched in 2008—now spans the Greater London Area, with approximately 1500 sq km demarcated as an Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ). Its emissions standards are stringent and discourage the use of highly polluting or non-compliant vehicles by charging a heavy daily LEZ fee.

According to Transport for London’s six-month report published in July 2024, the ULEZ has helped reduce harmful roadside nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations across the city. Over the years, the number of non-compliant vehicles driving within the LEZ has gone down as well. Now, a larger proportion of vehicles recorded in the LEZ are cleaner—96.2 percent, up from 39 percent in 2017. Further, a 2023 study by the University of Bath found that pollution reductions from the LEZ led to a 4.5 percent drop in long-term health problems and an 8 percent decline in respiratory issues.

At ITDP, we conducted a similar study in Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) to determine the reduction in vehicular pollution as a result of restricting highly polluting vehicles in an LEZ and shifting users to the least polluting vehicles. Our study estimates that if the city government restricted pre-BS and BS-I to -IV vehicles in a designated LEZ and if vehicle users shifted to BS-VI vehicles instead, PM 2.5 emissions from vehicles could decrease by 80 percent by 2030.

Planning and implementing LEZs in India

LEZs are not new to India. Matheran, a holiday town in Maharashtra, restricts motor vehicle use to preserve clean air. Farther north, highly polluting vehicles are restricted around Taj Mahal to protect the monument from the corrosive effects of greenhouse gases. Delhi imposes an environment compensation (EC) charge on polluting trucks to discourage them from entering the city en route to neighbouring states, compelling them to take bypasses instead.

Over the last year and a half, ITDP India and ICCT have been supporting three cities in Maharashtra—Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune, and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar—in planning and implementing LEZs. The plan includes identifying highly polluting vehicle categories, defining LEZs, estimating benefits, and recommending complementary measures such as improving public transport connectivity and establishing enforcement systems.

In August 2024, the PCMC included LEZ in its Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP), a comprehensive strategy to reduce pollution across different sectors, including but not limited to vehicles. As per GRAP, the city will discourage the use of pre-BS and BS-I to -III private cars, two-wheelers, and light- and heavy-goods vehicles—which contribute approximately 90 percent of the total annual vehicular emissions—when the air quality falls to the moderate to poor category. The city will not ban such vehicles but will impose an Environment Protection Fee ranging from INR 100 to INR 750 daily for entry and movement inside the city.

LEZs must be accompanied with complementary measures like parking management, footpath, cycle tracks and public transport

However, translating policy into practice will require several key actions. Here are some of them:

1. Coordination between government departments

Implementation of LEZ measures will require the city government to set up robust enforcement mechanisms. For one, they will need to engage a variety of stakeholders, including the traffic police, Regional Transport Office (RTO) authorities, environmental agencies, and road departments, and establish seamless systems for coordination and communication. Additionally, the municipal corporation will need to deploy cost-effective and scalable IT-based solutions, such as ANPR cameras, to monitor and enforce rules, for which it will require dedicated funds.

But while city governments are responsible for designing and implementing LEZ frameworks, they often lack the legal authority, resources, or enforcement capacity needed for large-scale changes. State governments can provide the necessary legal frameworks, policy support, and regulatory backing to enable cities to effectively enforce these zones. It is equally important for the central government to be involved in drafting overarching policies, establishing national standards, and providing financial support to ensure that cities have the resources to implement the required infrastructure. The push towards transport electrification offers an example of such multi-tiered governance. The FAME-II policy, for instance, incentivises electric two- and three-wheelers (including e-rickshaws), commercial electric four-wheelers, and electric buses nationwide. At the state level, 21 Indian states have notified EV policies, with 15 offering direct incentives to EV buyers. These policies promote adoption through various consumer-facing incentives, such as purchase subsidies, exemptions from road tax and registration fees, reimbursements, and scrapping incentives.

2. Designing complementary infrastructure

Complementary infrastructure must be designed and funded to provide residents with viable, non-polluting alternatives to private vehicles. These include expanding public transport networks, widening or repaving footpaths, and installing charging stations for compliant vehicles. Barcelona’s Superblocks initiative is an example of an urban planning approach designed to reallocate public space from vehicular use. It reorganises traffic flow within a 3×3 grid of city blocks, prioritising pedestrians and community activities over vehicles. Within each superblock, traffic and non-residential parking are redirected to perimeter roads, significantly reducing vehicle movement inside. Streets within the superblocks are repurposed into pedestrian-centric spaces, with strict speed limits and an emphasis on accessibility. The reclaimed areas are enhanced with green spaces, bike lanes, playgrounds, and public seating, fostering a more vibrant and communal urban environment.

3. Garnering citizen support

Apprehensions about transitioning to cleaner vehicles are common in cities worldwide. For private EVs, the primary concern is the higher upfront cost, while for EV buses, resistance often stems from long procurement and waiting periods. Low-income groups and businesses are particularly impacted by the costs associated with this shift, which may lead to resistance against the policy. Delayed communication about the transition can exacerbate this issue. For instance, if potential buyers are unaware of upcoming restrictions on ICE vehicles, they might unknowingly invest a significant portion of their income in them, only to face policy changes later. This can create frustration and opposition to the transition.

Recognising this, many cities around the world announce such plans at least a year in advance, allowing residents and businesses to make informed choices. Paris, for example, supports small businesses in making the switch by offering financial incentives for cleaner alternatives. Brussels offers information on cleaner vehicle alternatives and financial assistance through its dedicated LEZ website. This website also features a mobility coach, a service that provides personalised advice on mobility options in the city.   

As India advances its efforts to combat air pollution and environmental degradation, LEZs can be a viable solution. By curbing vehicular emissions, these zones can play a crucial role in improving air quality, easing congestion, and reclaiming urban spaces for healthier, more liveable cities. However, their success depends on integrating them within a multi-pronged strategy that includes strengthening public transport, enhancing pedestrian infrastructure, and supporting a just transition for affected communities. LEZs can serve as a starting point for reimagining India’s cities—where clean air is a right and sustainable mobility the norm, with urban spaces that prioritise people over pollution.

Written by Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India

Low Emission Zones: Breathing Life into Chennai’s Future

by

As appeared in the The New Indian Express

Chennai – from the bustling markets of T Nagar to the IT parks in OMR, is a city constantly on the move. But with every step forward, we seem to drag the weight of traffic and pollution along with us. Every day, hundreds of thousands of vehicles clog its arteries, choking the city with pollution, noise and traffic. Chennai’s roads see an addition of nearly 1.5 lakh vehicles every year. The result? Some days, the air we breathe in Chennai feels like smoking almost nine cigarettes every day. But what if we could create spaces where the air feels lighter, the roads free of traffic, and the sky a little clearer? One piece to this puzzle might lie in the concept that cities around the world, including some in India, are experimenting with – Low Emission Zones (LEZ), also often known as Clean Air Zones.
These zones typically limit highly polluting vehicles by either charging non-compliant ones or restricting the worst polluters, with penalties for violators. International cities like London, Milan, Seoul, Paris, Lima, and Beijing, have already embraced LEZs and Indian cities are not far behind

India’s LEZ Experiment: Hope on the Horizon

India is already exploring strategies to reduce urban pollution. Delhi’s Environment Compensation Charge (ECC) on commercial vehicles, Agra’s Zero Emission Zones (ZEZs) around the Taj Mahal, and Kevadiya’s restrictions on non-electric vehicles demonstrate proactive steps. Matheran banned all motor vehicles
to protect its ecosystem, while pedestrian zones (not classified as LEZs) in Delhi’s Chandni Chowk and Bengaluru’s Church Street show air quality improvements. Further, cities like Pune, Pimpri Chinchwad, and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar are trialling LEZs, prioritising area-wide interventions.

Why LEZs matter for Chennai

Staggering numbers on the Air Quality Index from cities like Delhi often overshadow narratives and make headlines, creating an impression that cities like Chennai do not have pressing air quality concerns. According to the Urban Emissions Report 2021, Chennai ranked among the top 10 cities in India with the worst air quality. Our everyday commute, especially through heavy traffic hotspots like T Nagar, Anna Salai, Kathipara junction, or Poonamallee High Road is not just stressful—it’s hazardous to our health, with exposure to dangerous levels of particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Imagine the impact a LEZ could have in this situation. London’s ULEZ, launched in 2019, reduced nitrogen dioxide by 44% and traffic by 30%, with a 21% increase in cycling. Barcelona’s LEZ cut traffic by 30%, NO2 levels by 24%, and increased cycling by 15%. Santiago’s LEZ reduced central traffic by 20%, with particulate matter and NO2 levels dropping by 40% in some areas. What if Chennai could experience a similar transformation?

Encouragingly, Tamil Nadu’s State Planning Commission, in collaboration with the British Deputy High Commission, Chennai, recently came out with a report on Low Emission Zoning – A Toolkit for Chennai. It integrates best practices from the UK with a customised roadmap for Chennai, balancing community engagement with the city’s unique priorities and the complexities of rapid urbanisation.

This report further states that LEZs in Chennai could cut NO2 and PM2.5 levels by over 20%, significantly improving public health. LEZs go beyond cleaner air—they improve street efficiency by cutting congestion, especially during peak hours, making commutes more reliable and fast. Fewer vehicles also mean fewer accidents, a problem that Chennai’s packed roads know all too well. They also offer cities a chance to step-up and enhance streets for walking and cycling.

For LEZs to truly succeed, the city will also need reliable and improved public transport services. Collaborations with the Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd (MTC) and the Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) are crucial to ensure that these zones are supported with high-quality and high-frequency services to encourage people to choose sustainable and affordable alternatives while reducing resistance to these zones. By using enforcement mechanisms, whether through priced or non-priced LEZs, implementing these zones in Chennai would support the state-wide goals to boost the adoption of electric vehicles as outlined in its EV Policy. The change doesn’t have to happen overnight, but with the right policies and action, it could be gradually phased in.

A Roadmap for Chennai  

Turning this vision into reality requires a clear roadmap.

1. Designing the Zones with Data:  

LEZs must be backed by data-driven insights. Use vehicle emission surveys across the city, air quality sensors and real-time traffic data to identify the most polluted and congested zones to deliver visible improvements. Clear policies and regulations: State and city level administrators should leverage the recent Low Emission Zoning Toolkit, to create clear policies that enable enforceable measures and plans.

2. Engaging People:

Involving communities and creating champions amongst health care professionals and local community leaders and others to support the cause is important.

3. Political Will

In addition to frameworks and policies, LEZs need elected officials to champion implementation. They must align stakeholders and ensure these ideas are prioritised in budgets and planning.

4. Phased Rollout

Begin by implementing Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) around areas like hospitals and schools.
As the improvements register in public consciousness, gradually, these zones can be expanded over a period of time, while encouraging the use of non-motorised mobility and making public transport more efficient

5. Measure Impact for Scale- Up

Track key metrics like air quality improvements, traffic reduction, and public transport adoption to evaluate success and expand programme.

LEZs offer a powerful, practical way to clear the air—figuratively and literally.
Let’s give Chennai the fresh breath it deserves.

Written by

Aswathy Dilip, Managing Director ITDP India, South Asia Director, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy

Sanjiv Gopal, Chief Strategy Officer, Asar

Union Budget 2025: Encouraging Push for Public Transport and E-Mobility, But Is It Enough? 

by

The latest Union Budget 2025-26 announcement by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on February 01, 2025 has shown continued support for public transport and e-mobility. This reflects the government’s commitment to sustainability.  

Here are the highlights in terms of allocations to promote more buses and electric mobility: 

Key Budget Allocations

  1. PM e-Bus Sewa Scheme: This scheme received Rs 1,310 crore (up from Rs 500 crore in 2024). This scheme aims to improve urban bus transport in India by providing nearly 10,000 urban buses to cities.  
  2. PM e-Drive Scheme: This new flagship scheme received an increased allocation from Rs 1,870 crore in 2024 to Rs 4,000 crore this year. This is a two-fold increase! The scheme will support in procuring 14,000 new e-buses, 1,10,000 e-rickshaws, e-trucks, and e-ambulances.  
  3. Production Linked Incentive (PLI) for Battery Storage: Under the overall push for PLI scheme, the National Programme on Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) Battery Storage, received a small share with an allocation of Rs 155.76 crore. This helps reduce battery costs and promote EVs but could have been higher. 

However, when we compare these allocations to actual needs, the gap remains significant. 

A Huge Gap in Urban Buses

India needs 2,00,000 urban buses, but only 35,000 are operational (inclusive of e-buses). To bridge this, the union government scheme provides just 24,000 buses (10,000 from PM e-Bus Sewa and 14,000 from PM e-Drive throughout the duration of the entire scheme over multiple years). This is far below than what is required.  

Pic: A crowded bus in Bhubaneshwar. Owing to no major investments in public transport over the years, the passenger experience has been deteriorating

Metro Rail Funding vs Bus Funding

In the 2025 budget, one standout was how the metro rail funding increased significantly from Rs 24,000 crore to Rs 31,000 crore, with Rs 649 crore in grants. We at ITDP India wish a similar allocation was done for PM e-Bus Sewa to make a big impact on bus services in alignment with the actual need for buses.  

The budget supports public transport and e-mobility, but to truly transform urban mobility, more investment and better execution of schemes are needed. Over and above this, sustainable mobility also requires investment in walking and cycling infrastructure as well and we hope this happens soon! 

By Vaishali Singh, Programme Manager, ITDP India

With inputs from Parin Visariya, Venugopal AV, Donita Jose

10 Impactful Solutions to Improve India’s Air Quality

by

Air pollution in India has reached a tipping point, threatening the health and well-being of millions. Amid this growing crisis, one promising solution is the implementation of Low Emission Zones (LEZs)—designated areas where polluting vehicles are restricted to curb emissions and improve air quality. To help cities across India tackle this issue, ITDP India recently launched Low Emission Zone Basics, a comprehensive guide for creating cleaner, healthier urban environments. 

At the launch, experts from global organisations shared crucial insights on how LEZs can play a pivotal role in addressing air pollution, while also offering policy recommendations to guide India’s path to cleaner air. From improving data collection to enhancing public transport and promoting localised climate action, these strategies provide a roadmap for urgent and effective change. Read on for key takeaways from the experts who are shaping the future of India’s air quality. 

The experts include, Shashi Verma, Chief Technology Officer, Transport for London (TfL); Dr. Anju Goel, Associate Director at The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI); Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India; Dr. Sandra Wappelhorst, Senior Researcher at The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), Berlin;  Sree Kumar Kumaraswamy, Program Director at World Resources Institute (WRI); and Dr. Vivek Vaidyanathan, Program Manager at Artha Global. 

1. Better research on sources of air pollution

Central government must invest in better collection and dissemination of data and research on the sources of pollution. To date, the public debate around pollution in India is clouded in fog with some suggesting it is because of Diwali and some suggesting is because of crop burning, which is fundamentally not true. Air pollution in Gangetic plains is far more complex and getting better evidence is something central government can work on – Shashi Verma, Chief Technology Officer, Transport for London (TfL)    

2. Need for multiple interventions

London’s air quality success stems from a series of cumulative interventions since the 1950s, starting with banning coal burning, introducing clean diesel programmes, and expanding LEZs. A major contributor to improvement was increasing the mode share of sustainable transport, which reduced overall vehicle numbers. The broader lesson is to have a comprehensive approach in addressing multiple sources of pollution. – Shashi Verma, Chief Technology Officer, Transport for London (TfL) 

3. State government must approve LEZs 

Pimpri Chinchwad, in Maharashtra has decided to implement an Environmental Protection Charge ranging from ₹100-750, for polluting vehicles entering the LEZs. But the enforcement of this requires collaboration with the Road Transport Officials (RTOs) and traffic departments. Currently, there is no provision within the transport department to address such violations, making the need for an enforcement mechanism essential. State-level approvals and notifications are also necessary to formally designate the area as a LEZ. State governments must play a supportive role by bringing all stakeholders together to develop a clear, actionable plan. – Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India 

4. Improve public transport

Public transport connectivity in most cities remains inadequate and requires significant upgrades. State support is crucial to ensure there is an increase in the number of buses and improvement in the overall network. – Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India

5. Package LEZs for health

One way to get faster acceptance of concepts like LEZs is to make the stakeholders focus on how it will improve health. Talking about its benefits in sensitive areas in terms of schools, places of worship, hospitals, works well in convincing city authorities to take this up. – Dr. Vivek Vaidyanathan, Program Manager at Artha Global 

6. Focus on funding clean air in rural areas

Currently the National Clean Air Programme funds go only to urban local bodies, where the concerns are more about road dust, vehicular emissions etc. But when it comes to rural areas, these funds are not applicable. Here the sources of pollution are also different like biomass burning. This is when state governments need to pitch in. Having only NCAP as a funding source won’t solve the problem. We need various other state level schemes.  – Dr. Anju Goel, Associate Director at The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) 

7. Budget for climate at municipality levels

Cities must explore ways to tap into their existing municipal budget to start climate works. If all departments commit some amount to climate, it can be a starting point with no need to look outside for funds. For instance, in most municipalities, the roads budget is the highest- so it can be leveraged to implement action to create clean air. – Sree Kumar Kumaraswamy, Program Director at World Resources Institute (WRI) 

8. Develop state-level schemes

States must come up with innovative mechanisms like the Majhi Vasundhara initiative in Maharashtra where the state has decentralised climate action. Now be it a village or a city, through their own means, they can take up small ticket projects that work towards climate action. This kind of model of sourcing innovation from the ground up is an excellent example and state can play a facilitating role to enable thinking innovatively. – Sree Kumar Kumaraswamy, Program Director at World Resources Institute (WRI) 

9. Focus on creating a good narrative

Create a phased and gradual LEZ plan with clear timelines to allow citizens and businesses to have time to adapt. Offer financial assistance to low-income groups and small businesses to transition to compliant vehicles. Develop mobility programs like air bonuses to encourage alternatives to car ownership. Speak to all stakeholders and communicate the programme. – Dr. Sandra Wappelhorst, Senior Researcher at The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), Berlin 

10. Start with CPCBs and non-attainment cities

When working with state governments, the Central Pollution Control Board is a good entry point, wherein they can enact some of the state-wide regulations and laws that’s applicable to all non-attainment cities. – Dr. Vivek Vaidyanathan, Program Manager at Artha Global

Low Emission Zone Basics

Written by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communications and Development, ITDP India

Three Things Indian Cities Need to do Now to Start the Fight Against Vehicular Pollution 

by

“Winter is coming”—a phrase made famous by the sitcom series Game of Thrones—has found an eerie resonance in India. Much like how the people of Winterfell dreaded the arrival of winter and the mythical evil creatures- the White Walkers, in India, it is not a creature, but the polluted air itself, that is dreaded.  

Though it’s barely November, a thick layer of pollutants is already blanketing the skies, and all eyes are searching for the culprits. Is it construction waste, crackers, or crop burning? However, one source, which remains largely overlooked, and often slides through the cracks, while continuing to remain the biggest challenge- is vehicular pollution. A recent study by the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology confirms this. Conducted in the month of October 2024, the study revealed that stubble burning contributed only 1-2% of Delhi’s total air pollution in the month, while vehicular emissions accounted for a significant 11.2% – 14.2%. This makes vehicle emissions the single biggest identifiable, yet silent contributor to poor air quality, which affects the Indian cities not just in winter but year-round—making it the most urgent problem to address. 

Infact, studies being released year after year all indicate how rapidly the situation is deteriorating. The latest report reiterating this, is the Greenpeace report, which spotlights the alarming situation in South Indian cities specifically, which conventionally were believed to have cleaner air. The data from this report suggests the PM2.5 level in these cities is also no better for living standards, with a few like Hyderabad, Chennai, and Visakhapatnam, seeing levels up to 9- 10 times higher than WHO standard. As explained above, a significant part of these rising pollution levels is contributed by the growing population of vehicles.  

While the sustainable transport sector has long advocated for walking, cycling, public transport, and clean vehicle technology as solutions, it is clear that combating vehicular pollution requires a multifaceted approach beyond that. This blog outlines three key Mantras (strategies) that cities can adopt right now to tackle this growing menace. Some of these have already been implemented/ in the process of implementation in our lighthouse city, Pimpri Chinchwad, which stands as a good example for many other growing Indian cities. 

1. Shift to sustainable modes such as walking, cycling, and public transport  

First, cities should focus on creating not just isolated stretches but comprehensive networks of footpaths and cycle tracks. A well-connected network makes sustainable transport options more convenient and accessible, encouraging people to shift to these modes.  

However, providing just infrastructure may not be enough in most cases. Cities must invest in raising awareness through campaigns to nudge behavior change. Policies and legislative reforms are also crucial to embedding these practices into the city’s fabric. 

What’s a good model to emulate? Many global cities, such as Singapore, have initiated the concept of 15-minute cities. Some Indian Cities have had the chance to adopt this concept, leveraging existing initiatives like the Harit Setu project in Pimpri Chinchwad, which aims to enhance walking and cycling infrastructure in the city. Here, the plan is to make a localised network of connected footpaths and cycling tracks within smaller neighbourhoods, across the city so that people can simply opt to walk or cycle for short distances. Through such interventions, they also get sustainable options for last- mile connectivity. 

A glimpse of Linear Garden street, one of the ideal streets in PCMC which prioritises pedestrians and cyclists

However, while walking and cycling provide a sustainable alternative for short trips, they alone will not reduce congestion or pollution. For longer trips, more and better buses which connect the many networks of roads are the need of the hour to alleviate pollution and congestion. Moreover, improving bus services, including their frequency, reliability, and coverage, is crucial. Buses should seamlessly integrate with other transport modes, such as metro systems, footpaths, and cycle tracks, creating a comprehensive and efficient transport network. This interconnectedness enables commuters to make longer journeys more conveniently, thus making public transport a more attractive option. 

While these suggestions might shift a chunk of road users to sustainable modes, there will still be a section who would opt to use personal/private vehicles for travel because of its convenience. To address the emission concerns for that segment, incentivising cleaner vehicles will be an option.  

2. Incentivise people to use cleaner vehicles

Alongside promoting sustainable modes of transport, cities need to encourage the use of cleaner vehicles. This can be done in three ways: transitioning to cleaner technologies, scrapping older polluting vehicles, and building robust electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure. 

India has already taken a step in this direction by adopting Bharat Stage-VI (BS-VI) emission standards, which significantly reduce emissions from new vehicles. However, cities can push this further by promoting electric vehicles (EVs). Local governments should implement strong scrappage policies that incentivise owners of older, polluting vehicles to retire and scrap them in exchange for financial benefits or rebates on EVs.  

Cities also need to upscale their EV infrastructure, particularly by setting up widespread charging stations. A comprehensive EV Readiness Plan can guide cities in developing this infrastructure and ensuring that the transition to EVs is smooth and well-supported. 

For example, Pimpri Chinchwad’s Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan 2023 outlines some of these, by setting a goal of having 30% of the new vehicle registrations in city shift to EV by 2026.  They are doing so by establishing 100 EV charging stations and offering incentives for e-auto drivers. Property tax rebates are also being offered to those setting up charging point in their properties. Furthermore, the PCMC’s and Pune’s shared bus service, Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd (PMPML), already operates 473 e-buses—India’s third-largest fleet—and is continuing to expand its fleet. These efforts – both on the front improved vehicle technology and on the front of emission reduction through improved public transport, not only reduce emissions but also set the stage for a future where EVs become the primary mode of motorised transport. 

Cities infact can go a step further, to effectively promote the use of cleaner vehicles. They can go for a dual approach of simultaneously making it more challenging to rely on personal vehicles.  

An electric bus from PMPML fleet

3. Discourage the use of personal vehicles through pricing parking and LEZs 

Cities must make it harder for people to rely on private vehicles, especially older, polluting models. Two effective ways to achieve this are by pricing parking and establishing Low Emission Zones (LEZs). 

Proper parking management can reduce the number of vehicles on the road by making it expensive to park in public spaces. When parking fees are levied, people think twice before using their cars, potentially avoiding the trip, opting for shorter trips, using public transport or finding other alternative solutions instead. This approach not only discourages unnecessary vehicle use but also frees up critical street space for creating vibrant public spaces on street. When authorised designated spots are demarcated by the city on the streets, it further reduces the time and fuel wasted in searching for a parking spot.  

Effective parking management can deter vehicle use, while LEZs take it a step further by restricting the most polluting vehicles from entering key areas. Together, they provide a strong mechanism to reduce vehicular emissions. 

In an LEZ, only vehicles with low or zero emissions—such as electric vehicles or those that meet the recommended emission standards (BS-VI)—are allowed to enter. LEZs can be city-wide or focused on strategically selected areas, making them an effective tool for cutting emissions in densely populated regions. 

For instance, in cities like London there has been a drastic reduction. As per the Mayor’s report, London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), launched in 2019, has led to a 44% reduction in nitrogen dioxide levels and a roughly 30% decrease in traffic in central areas, alongside a 21% increase in cycling. 

In India, a study by ITDP India and ICCT in Pimpri Chinchwad found that restricting pre-BS-VI vehicles in a designated LEZ could reduce PM 2.5 emissions by up to 91% within a year (if all the pre-BS-VI users switch to EVs). Without such measures, pollution levels will decrease by only 50% in the next five years, under current practices (which involves the expected business as usual gradual natural transition to BS-VI). 

Designated parking spaces created on a street in PCMC

While these three Mantras provide a holistic approach to combat vehicular emissions, acknowledging the issue is the first step.  We urge cities and policymakers not to let air pollution caused by vehicles fade into the background or be treated as a seasonal issue. Addressing vehicular emissions requires year-round effort—mode shift, cleaner vehicle technologies, and Low Emission Zones must work in tandem to tackle pollution from all angles. 

Written by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communications and Development, ITDP India

With technical inputs from Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India

Answers to Some Common Questions About Low Emission Zones

by

With the idea of Low Emission Zones (LEZs) gaining steam in India, here are a few concepts on the Legal, Institutional, and Technological aspects of vehicular emission.

A recap of Urbanlogue 4.0 Episode 2

LEZs are the need of the hour to arrest the invisible yet harmful impact of vehicular pollution. However, the entire subject can be challenging to grasp. Alongside figuring out the enforcement technology and monitoring, in India, data quality and impacts on marginalised communities add to the complexity. 

On September 18, ITDP India and ICCT hosted a webinar featuring six experts, moderated by Amit Bhatt, India Managing Director, ICCT, wherein they unwrapped these concepts by sharing their journeys from managing air/vehicular pollution in cities like Delhi, Pimpri Chinchwad, and Surat, alongside insights from Brussels and Seoul. You can watch the full webinar here. 

Here are seven frequently asked questions around Low Emission Zones, which were answered during  the webinar. 

1. What are the technologies available to enforce Low Emission Zones and which is best suited for Indian context? 

Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India, highlighted two key enforcement methods for India: Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). 

“What’s currently feasible in India is ANPR, which uses cameras to read vehicle number plates and deduct fees for entering Low Emission Zones,” Visariya explained. GNSS, an alternative, connects to an on-board unit inside the vehicle via a cellular network to charge fees, though the unit costs INR 8,000-10,000. 

Srinivas Ganji, Solution Delivery Director (Urban Transport), Arcadis, discussed the challenges of both. ANPR faces issues like low visibility due to weather, traffic congestion, and low-light conditions. However, due to improved algorithms and infrared cameras, the efficacy of ANPR system is close to 90%.  

Regarding GNSS, Ganji pointed out a few concerns. “A lot of incentives will have to be given to maintain the onboard unit. Privacy is also a concern as all movements can be tracked and it’s still a question on who will bear the charges of transmission of the data.”  

2. Are our vehicle emissions measuring methods robust enough? 

Vaibhav Kush, Researcher at ICCT, highlighted the importance of accurately monitoring emissions for implementing LEZs. Currently, India measures pollution at two stages: during vehicle prototype testing before the production and through Pollution Under Control (PUC) checks. However, these methods only reflect emissions under controlled conditions, either in labs or when vehicles are stationary. Neither show actual pollution levels emitted. Factors like load, maintenance, driving habits, road surface, traffic congestion impact emissions. 

ICCT’s 2022 study in Delhi using the roadside sensors revealed a significant gap between tested and real-world emissions.   

3. What are the various legal routes to implement LEZs  

Vaibhav Kush, further elaborated on the legal routes to establish LEZs. He explained that LEZs require legal backing for notifying the LEZ area, restricting polluting vehicle type, imposing fines and more. There are legal provisions available at national, state and city level. It depends on which government is initiating it. Vaibhav highlighted the cases of vehicle restrictions implemented in Delhi, Taj Trapezium Zone in Agra, Kevadia in Gujarat. He also highlighted a case where judiciary (Supreme Court) ordered the Delhi government to levy the environment compensation charge. 

He highlighted that the Air Act of 1981, Central Motor Vehicle Act of 1988 and state laws like Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act 1949, can enable LEZ implementation. 

4. How robust should the city’s pollution monitoring network be? 

Ronak Sutaria, Founder and CEO, and Kevin Joshi, Product Engineer and Researcher, from Respirer Living Sciences, emphasised the need for robust and dense pollution monitoring networks to implement LEZs. For Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC), they deployed low-cost monitoring machines to measure PM 2.5 and 10 across 20 locations, focusing on densely populated areas. The data was shared with SMC and revealed nuanced results—PM 2.5 levels spiked during morning rush hours at certain junctions, while industrial areas peaked in the evening, and commercial zones showed higher levels during weekends. Regular analysis enabled tailored decisions and actions. 

“We need data analytics specialists, to help city corporations make informed decisions,” Joshi stated. 

On data accuracy, Ronak also highlighted that it is important to understand the purpose of using the data. Based on technologies and their cost, data accuracy can vary between 70%-90%.  

5. Is crowdsourcing of pollution data the way ahead for monitoring and predicting pollution levels in micro levels? 

Dr Suraj Ghosh, Associate Counsellor from CII- ITC Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Development, shared that their pollution monitoring and forecasting model was built on crowdsourced data. Their new model integrates emission inventories, meteorological data, live traffic, ambient air quality, and sensor data. By applying the Chemical Transport Model, they can predict pollutant levels for the next 72 hours, which aids measures like the Graded Response Action Plans. 

Their model achieves a resolution of 1 km x 1 km down to zone and ward levels, with the potential to enhance accuracy to 200 meters, though data quality remains a concern. “To improve accuracy of forecasts, we need good data,” he shared. 

6. What can cities in India learn from international cities like Brussels, Seoul, and London? 

Anindita Ghosh, Senior Researcher, UITP, shared several insights from different cities’ LEZ experiences. In Brussels, citizens were proactive in pushing the government to implement LEZs. In Seoul, LEZs were introduced only in the Business Zone, a model that could work in India as well. 

In all these cities, including London, effective communication played a vital role. “Engaging citizens consistently is key. Making them part of the process is essential,” Ghosh said. Various tools such as leaflets, videos, and advertisements were used extensively, with communication beginning 2-3 years before implementation. Efforts were also made to include marginalised communities, a practice that should be adopted in India. 

7. How can we address equity issues on marginalised communities while implementing LEZ? 

Globally, cities have provided incentives to encourage the transition to cleaner vehicles. Cities have provided free public transport passes for two years. Financial incentives are priortised for e-cycles and small freight vehicles for businesses, subject to polluting vehicles being scrapped. Incentives for personal cars are avoided to reduce congestion. All cities invest heavily in improving public transport, walking and cycling infrastructure. Indian cities, similarly, must priortise to improve public transport (especially bus transport) and offer target incentives after analysing the budget. 

Watch this space for more on Low Emission Zones! Join our Whatsapp group now for more webinars and talks!


Team Urbanlogue 

Written by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communications and Development, ITDP India

With technical inputs from Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India

Budget 2024: A Wishlist for Sustainable Transport by ITDP India

by

As the Finance Minister of India prepares to announce the new budget for the country shortly, our diverse team has brainstormed a list of budgetary interventions we wish to see in the upcoming budget and beyond.  

In a post-pandemic world, as our cities grow more rapidly than ever, facing various climate change impacts, our wishlist aims to put ‘sustainability’ at the forefront of our transport and urban policies. Here is a list of five action areas where we seek to see increased focus and budget prioritisation. 

1. Ensuring allocation of Transport Budgets towards Sustainable Mobility  

What we want: At least 50-60% of the total transport budget to be allocated for sustainable mobility projects including public bus transport, e-buses, walking, cycling, micro-mobility, e-shared passenger and freight across Indian cities. 

Why: As per 2011 Census, nearly 72% of trips in India are on foot, cycle, and public transport. It is only fair that the transport budget reflects this proportion, ensuring that sustainable transport receives the attention and funding it deserves. 

2. Prioritising More Buses, Better Buses, Greener Buses 

What we want:  A 15-fold scale-up of national programs like the PM E-Bus Sewa Scheme to ensure More Buses, Better Buses, and Green Buses in all cities with financial support. Financial support should be provided to public bus operators in the form of viability gap funding on Gross Cost Contracts (GCC). 

Electrification of private sector buses, which make up for 93% of buses in India, presents an opportunity for reducing emissions that can be facilitated through lower interest rates for loans, longer loan tenure, and a leasing model. 

Why: Public and private bus transport forms the backbone of Indian transportation, catering to 30 crore daily passenger trips. It is crucial to improve both the quality and quantity of both the public and private buses through prioritised investments in better and greener options.  

With ~20 lakh public and private buses in India. Even if just one-fifth of these buses go electric, it could reduce 85 lakh tonnes of CO2 emissions per year– helping India achieve its 2070 Net Zero vision.  

3.Creating Walking and Cycling Friendly Indian cities  

What we want: Specific budgetary allocation and a national commitment towards creating walking and cycling-friendly streets across Indian cities. All states should be guided towards adopting state-level street design guidelines, policies, and action plans. These must be followed when taking up upgradation or street development work.  

Why: A robust walking and cycling infrastructure provide a highly cost-effective means of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, improving public health, saving money for residents, increasing access to opportunities and improving public safety in cities. For this very reason, world over attempt is being made to increase walking and cycling. But in India, already 48% of the population commutes by walking or cycling, as per Census 2011. This goes to show that we have a strong demand for walking and cycling. 

Despite the clear and significant benefits that investments in walking & cycling infrastructure bring to pedestrians, cyclists, and society at large, this is not adequately reflected in the transport budgets or actions of national, state, and city agencies. The lack of prioritisation for safe walking and cycling infrastructure has been a persistent issue across Indian cities and should be a key focus moving forward.

4.Connecting the Dots: Seamless Integration

What we want: Budget allocation for cities with ongoing and upcoming metro projects to ensure seamless physical, information, and fare integration. The integration should be based on the local area plans, between different modes of transportation including bus, metro, suburban rail, walk, and cycle within a 500m radius of any station area, to encourage a modal shift to sustainable modes of transport.  

Why: Seamless integration plays a crucial role in making people shift to sustainable transport.  The journey must be convenient, seamless, and connected right from planning, boarding, alighting, payments etc. Unless these are integrated, private vehicle users may not shift to sustainable transport modes. 

5. Pricing Pollution

What we want: Provide policy, technical, and budgetary support to states and cities towards adopting parking policies, implementing parking management measures, and setting up low emission zones with a mobility component. These measures can discourage the use of polluting vehicles through pricing and reduce traffic congestion. The national government could encourage cities to develop newer revenue sources by pricing parking and polluting vehicles. 

Why: As per the World Air Quality Report 2023, India is the third most polluted country in the world. Several Indian cities like Delhi, feature in the infamous list of most polluted places in the world. There is an urgent need for separate budget allocation to implement strategies that tackle vehicular pollution and congestion which can lead to lower costs related to road maintenance, healthcare, and fuel consumption. 

Cities can also generate new revenue sources by pricing parking and implementing charges for polluting vehicles. This revenue can be reinvested in sustainable urban mobility projects. 

But how can these be effectively rolled out ensuring accountability for cities? Well, here are some suggestions:  

a. Set up a National Sustainable Mobility Mission, empowered to allocate funds under an Urban Transport Fund, monitor projects, and fastrack sustainability mobility projects across state/cities.  

b. Adopt a result-oriented approach for every project undertaken via the National Sustainable Mobility Mission. For every project, a framework is to be adopted, and budget should be specifically allocated within project costs for ‘Impact assessment of infrastructure’ and performance audit of programs to ensure public money is spent wisely benefitting large masses. 

c. Empower those cities that have an operational Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA) or a Green Mobility Cell to avail the budgetary support from the national mission. These entities should be empowered legally and financially to facilitate coordination, planning, and execution of sustainable transport initiatives among various agencies.  

d. Set up a Green Mobility Data Centre for data-driven decision-making. These data-centres can collect granular and gender-disaggregated mobility data, analyse the same. The collected data can be used for planning, design, budgeting, management, enforcement, and performance evaluation of all mobility interventions and initiatives. 

e. Empower the states and cities to revise existing Motor Vehicle Acts, Municipal and District Acts with rules for prioritising pedestrian-friendly infrastructure to avail the budgetary support. Cities will have to ensure that all upgraded or newly laid out street development will be completed with the provision of safe, continuous, and comfortable pedestrian infrastructure as per the national street design guidelines. 

f. Create a national platform for technical experts who can especially support Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities in piloting and scaling up infrastructure projects. This will ensure high quality planning, design, and implementation of the projects across India. 

g. Mandate state and city transport to make allocations in transport budgets that benefit women, gender minorities, and vulnerable users. It’s enforcement can be done by setting up Inclusive Mobility Committee and/or Inclusion officers. Initiatives such as women-led transport cooperatives for ride sharing services, measures to ensure travel safety, training for these users in roles like drivers, mechanics and engineers should be explored 

As we began compiling our wish list, we realised that what we truly desire is a return to prioritising the basics. We seek strong national commitment to fulfil the 2030 sustainable mobility vision for India, where all cities have: 

A– Accessible and safe streets for all. 

B– Buses near everyone, everywhere, on time. 

C– Congestion and pollution free cities. 

Written by

Team ITDP India

Connecting the Dots of Delhi’s Public Transport System

by

A case for improving Delhi’s last-mile connectivity

Delhi—yeh sheher nahi, mehfil hai— a nostalgia bestowed upon Delhiites, from savouring the aromas of gully food, to being enchanted by the mehfil on old streets, and sometimes combined with a feeling of impending chaos. What happens when this chaos threatens the very existence of Delhi’s mehfil? Are we ready for ‘yeh Delhi sheher nahi, parking garage hai’? 

As difficult it may be to let go of the age-old nostalgia of streets imagined as mehfils (gathering spaces for sharing poetry or classical music), the reality is that Delhi is clogged with cars! This is despite the city operating India’s “best-run mass rapid transit system” – the Delhi Metro. It’s vast network of over 340 kms helps 26 lakh people commute every day in the National Capital Region (NCR). While the system is classified as one of the largest in the world, it caters to less than 10 percent of NCR. Personal motor vehicles continue to rule the roost. 

On the other hand, Delhi’s bus system is completely omitted from the public transport equation. Based on the existing demand and the burgeoning population, Delhi is short of over 6,000 buses – which means, Delhi needs to double its existing fleet strength. Efforts to bridge the gap in the supply of buses is the need of the hour. Lack of efficient public transport systems and the absence of last-mile connectivity has fuelled the insatious demand for personal motor vehicles. Let us now look at the issue of ‘last-mile’ connectivity. 

Last-mile connectivity—how people actually get to and from the stations, particularly the Metro—has been a matter of concern among Delhi commuters. Issues surrounding the safety, convenience, and comfort to reach a station from a workplace or home, and vice-versa, has been the talk of the town for a few years now, yet neglected. 

Privately run CNG autos, e-rickshaws, Gramin Sewa, and the Phat Phat Sewa have stepped in to provide last-mile connectivity, in the interim. While these systems have the stamp of legality by the State government and have managed to satisfy a portion of the mobility demand, they are largely unorganised and unregulated. The debate of whether they are a resource or a nuisance, continues. 

Delhi is reported to have one lakh e-rickshaws, of which a mere 35,000 are registered, and over a lakh CNG autos. Filling the last-mile connectivity gap comes at a cost of traffic snarls and safety concerns among its citizens. Areas around metro stations have become the new choke points given the lack of integration with formal public transport, haphazard parking on main roads, and an overall lack of traffic and parking management.

Traffic jam of autos outside metro station in Delhi (Credit: Aaj Ki Awaaz)

It may be time for Delhi to shift focus from its archaic approach to connect the dots of its public transit system – bring home the mini-bus. When it comes to bus-based transit, let’s face it, this underdog of transit is by far one of the most efficient, affordable, and convenient modes of transport. Just one mini-bus can replace five rickshaws, or in other words, the bus can move more people in fewer vehicles in a compact amount of road space. 

The mini-bus can provide the best option to improve last-mile connectivity. With better technology, services, and integration with the metro, the bus can unclog streets in Delhi, especially those around metro stations. So what does that mean for rickshaw drivers – are their livelihoods at risk? A successful transition should ensure that rickshaw drivers are formally employed into the system. 

For Delhi to transition towards a people-friendly city rather than a personal motor vehicle garage, it needs to improve accessibility, affordability, and frequency of public transit as well. Cities like Pune have taken the initial steps of assessing public transit system gaps through the People Near Transit (PNT) tool, prepared with technical assistance from the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) India programme. Pune has endorsed the PNT tool to further improve its public transit reach to reduce dependency on personal motor vehicles – a similar issue that Delhi has been tackling for over a decade. Delhi can use the PNT tool to reshape its public transport to serve maximum and pollute minimum.

For far too long, cities have ignored what is arguably the most affordable and flexible public transit option, the humble mini-bus. In the name of last-mile connectivity, rickshaws have filled the gap and where unavailable, cars have taken over. In the case of Delhi, where the city can no longer afford to squeeze more cars onto its roads, the bus can provide mobility to the maximum number of people in a compact amount of road space. Delhi should champion a publicly-run mini-bus system to solve its last-mile connectivity woe; after all, a successful bus-system has never failed to move a city.

Written by Kashmira Dubash

Technical Direction: Vishnu Mohanakumar

Far from global standards, here’s what went wrong with Delhi BRT

by

Ferrying over 35 million passengers daily in cities across the world, the bus-rapid transit (BRT) system has proven to be the balm for urban commute woes. Yet, its mention in the Indian transport circles evokes a lingering hangover of the system’s massive failure in Delhi.

Why Delhi chose to go the BRT way

By 2004, the Delhi population was caught in the upswing of urban migration and public transport woes — with the “Killer Blueline” buses on a rampage. It was also when experts had assembled to conceive the Delhi BRT system. A high-quality bus-based transit system, it aimed to deliver fast, comfortable, and affordable services at metro-level capacities.

Worldover successful BRT systems were set up with segregated lanes, stations typically aligned to the center of the road, off-board fare collection, and fast and frequent operations. The Delhi BRT network, however, met some but overlooked most of these benchmarks. This disregard and ensuing public outcry led to its failure and demise.

Here’s a look at what went wrong and why the discourse surrounding the Delhi BRT needs a tone check.

Losing face: media and public outcry

One of the point of contention against the Delhi BRT, among Delhi commuters, was the soaring travel time. But it was found that commute hours for BRT users saw a significant drop of 40%. The project affected motorists and it is these voices that rang louder in echo chambers created by media outlets.

This was followed by court cases which sought entry of cars to the bus-only lanes, contesting the value of “wealth creators” with that of bus users. In 2012, the Delhi High Court quashed the plea, quoting Bogota Mayor Enrique Peñalosa, “A developed country is not one where the poor own cars. It is one where the rich use public transport.”

The verdict wasn’t enough to calm the clamour for scrapping the initiative. The case offered insight to how misinformed media reports were able to pushback on a “basic” BRT setup, while throttling bus transit.    

From BRT bus-only lane to free-for-all lane

To begin with, there were never dedicated BRT buses for the BRT bus lanes. So low-floor buses were brought in haphazardly to fill in this void. After resolving the initial confusion regarding the operation of the lanes, they were thrown open to buses of all sizes, utility, and forms. This led to congestion and bus bunching, as many of these poorly maintained buses would either breakdown or stall the low-floor “BRT buses”.

Even so, the Delhi BRT managed to carry 12,000 passengers per hour per direction, albeit at a grinding speed of 13 km/hr. An indication that the transit system was doing its job but lane congestion was clearly hindering its performance.

Commuters struggled without level boarding  

One of the key USP of BRT transit is accessibility to all commuters — especially children, caregivers, the elderly, and the disabled. And the Delhi BRT missed the mark as it overlooked level boarding. Therefore, the network witnessed commuters struggling to board or alight buses.

Simply put, level boarding requires the bus station platforms and the floors of the bus fleet designed to match their height. This allows seamless movement and accessibility to commuters. In Delhi’s case the lack of dedicated BRT buses exacerbated the problem.

Anything but free-flowing

What does a city get when it builds an entire transport network on the premise of free-flowing transit, but ignores the free-flowing bit. The Delhi BRT it is! The system which was dedicated to prioritise and facilitate bus movement did anything but that.

With six-phase intersections, traffic management along the 6 km stretch was never worked out to improve bus movement. And this failure was evident as junctions lay witnessed to buses piling up by the dozen and commuters caught in the chaos of boarding or deboarding on the carriageways itself.

Stepchild treatment: Delhi Metro over BRT     

Among Delhi BRT critics an analysis would sound incomplete without drawing comparison with the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC). A world-renowned and efficient transit system, the Delhi Metro has been catering to the needs of many a daily passengers. How many you ask? Around 23 lakh in 2019. Now, compare that to Delhi’s 40 lakh bus ridership — which has been wavering off-late given its state of neglect — and investing in a bus-based transit system seems a plausible move.

The Delhi Metro is doing a good job because of the autonomy and funding it receives. Whereas in Delhi BRT’s case, there wasn’t even a unified body to overlook the gamut of functions. This led to various obstacles, the most evident being lane enforcement. The BRT  lanes were pretty much a free-for-all, with private vehicles and buses of all kinds fighting out in the meleè.

Now, let’s look at the disparity in cost. The 6 km Ambedkar Nagar to Moolchand (Delhi) BRT stretch, which included the BRT and walking and cycling infrastructure, cost about Rs 200 crore to build and a further Rs 150 crore to dismantle the bus lane. While the metro rail costs the exchequer Rs 550 crore per km for underground and Rs 250 crore per km for the elevated line.

Image source: The Hindu

Limited scope for a limited corridor

Planned as a four-corridor project, the Delhi BRT was caught in a limbo pretty early on. The initial 18 km stretch, from Ambedkar Nagar to Delhi Gate, was launched on a trial run of 5.8 km on April 2008. And that’s all that was left of it when the system was dismantled.

The limitation of the Delhi BRT’s potential can be directly attributed to the limitation in expanding the corridors and the network. Though bus speeds improved within the pilot stretch, they would sink as soon as buses would get out of the network into mixed traffic.

Lack of public acceptance due to lack of outreach

One of the key observations from the Delhi BRT debacle is that the public doesn’t take to rapid transit networks like ducks to water. The Delhi BRT severely lacked in public outreach and the system utilisation was affected due to this dearth.

The BRT in Delhi was introduced to challenge conventional bus commute, which barely offered comfort and convenience. Yet, little to no information about this transformation and usage of the system was disseminated among the general public, most importantly bus users. So naturally what ensued was chaos on the BRT stations and lanes.

With Delhi planning to revisit the BRT project, though elevated, these above points along with global benchmarks needs to be part of the conversation. The city has a chance to rewrite its transport history and revitalise a transit system which is time-tested and continues to serve a majority of its people.

In the second blog, of this three-part BRT series, we talk about the basics of getting BRT right and how Hubbali-Dharwad could be close to the gold standard.

Written by : Rohit James

Edited by : Kashmira Medhora Dubash

Banner Image source : DNA INDIA







ITDP India – Our Journey from a Dream to Reality

team ITDP

by

It was back in 1998 that ITDP began its engagements in India, inspired by Mahatma Gandhi’s words, “Be the change that you wish to see in the world.” What started as one woman’s journey to change the dystopian path our cities were drifting towards has transformed into a formidable force of young, passionate visionaries who strive to bring back life in a place we call home. Today, ITDP celebrates two decades of action on the ground, catalysing tangible transformation at scale in over a third of urban India.

Transportation is the focus of many pressing issues facing the world today—decisions about whether to build highways or bus corridors have a great impact on our health and our planet. For this reason, ITDP has worked with over 18 Indian cities to reduce the human impact of transport choices: ensuring cities put people before cars, all citizens can walk and cycle safety, and jobs and services are a bus ride away. Through the dedicated efforts of our team and a strategic approach towards sustainable transport, ITDP India programme has impacted the lives of millions for the past 20 years.

ITDP in India

The journey in India began in Agra. The vision to develop a modern cycle rickshaw to counter the growing threats of motor vehicular pollution, gave way to the India Cycle Rickshaw Improvement Project. What started off as five prototypes has become sustainably embedded as the standard design in cities across North India. Today, around half a million of these modern cycle rickshaws serve  4-5 million zero-carbon trips daily and offer dignified livelihood to over a million people, transforming the lives of their families as well.

Cycle rickshaws

ITDP realised the need to transform the quality and availability of public transport in Indian cities. Since 2003, the India Programme evangelised the idea of the Bus Rapid Transit (popularly known as BRT) to transform mediocre bus services into high-quality mass transit.

Ahmedabad, Gujarat’s largest city, welcomed ITDP to reimagine bus transit in 2005. Our partnership with Environment Planning Collaborative, and thereafter with CEPT University and the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation resulted in the launch of Janmarg (in 2009)—India’s first high quality BRT system that expands to a network of 87 km. Janmarg has inspired many cities in India, and with guidance from ITDP, five cities have created 200 km of high-quality BRT to date.

janmarg

In 2009, the India Programme revolutionised the way people perceived streets in India. Safe, child-friendly streets are not just a mirage of the past, but can be a beautiful reality even today. Ahmedabad was the first city in India to host Car-Free Sundays in collaboration with ITDP, Riverside School and other partners.  The initiative allowed citizens to experience the freedom of walking and cycling on safer car-free streets.  The success enabled expansion to Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra to raise awareness and transform their streets into places we all dream of everyday.

ITDP India Programme initiated collaboration with Chennai City Connect in 2009 to improve cycling and walking conditions across the city. Change isn’t easy in cities where the car is a symbol for status. But within five years of ITDP’s engagement with the city, Chennai took the bold move of adopting the Non Motorised Transport (NMT) Policy—first in India.

The policy mandates that a minimum of 60 percent of of transport funding to create and maintain walking and cycling infrastructure in the city. Having retrofitted over 50 km of walkable streets over the years, Chennai has initiated the next phase of redesigning an additional 50 km of street network. Chennai’s policy has inspired many national and international cities—from Chandigarh to Nairobi—to adopt similar policies. The comprehensive approach undertaken by Chennai, was awarded the Sustainia Award in 2015.

 

chennai complete streets

Since 2013, the India Programme has worked with the smaller cities of Tamil Nadu – Coimbatore, Trichy, Tirupur, Salem, and Madurai.  In Coimbatore, the Namma Kovai Namakke (Our Coimbatore Ourselves) campaign, initiated by ITDP, sparked citizen demand for better pedestrian facilities. Coimbatore was the first city in Tamil Nadu to host Car-Free Sundays, that inspired Chennai and Madurai to do the same. The city also adopted The Coimbatore Street Design and Management Policy that aims to increase walking, cycling and public transport use. In light of Coimbatore’s vision to improve people-mobility, the city has planned a 30 km-network of walking and cycling paths to connect the city’s major lakes, in line with the guiding Policy.  

The India programme began its engagements in Maharashtra in 2009, first with the Municipal Corporations of Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad, and thereafter in Nashik and Aurangabad. Today, Pune is the epitome of a smart Indian city. Pune launched 40 kms of the Rainbow BRT in 2015, with an additional 45 km in the pipeline. The city adopted the Urban Street Design Guidelines and plans to redesign 100 km of streets based on the world-class standards set by the transformation of  JM Road and DP Road pilot project.

While Pune has taken the first steps towards developing a people-centric city, the next challenge is to address the encroachment onto footpaths by parked vehicles. As a result, Pune adopted the Public Parking Policy to regulate parking, in 2018. The Policy aims to manage on-street parking through an efficient paid parking system but exempts bicycle parking from any charges. Pune realises that encouraging cycling reduces CO2, improves commuters’ health and increases retail visibility. As a result, the city plans to implement a dockless Public Bicycle Sharing system of 13,100 cycle, under the city’s Bicycle Plan.  Yes, the city has worked wonders. Pune, Chennai, and Coimbatore – all cities ITDP assisted, were selected in the first round of the national government’s Smart City Mission.  

Pune complete streets

In 2013, the India programme also expanded to Ranchi, the capital of the state of Jharkhand. Local conditions were unfavourable to support sustainable transport; thus, ITDP initiated collaboration with local civil society groups, educational institutions and trade associations that formed the Ranchi Mobility Partnership. Ranchi’s Mobility for All action plan prepared by ITDP, with input from the partners, provided a detailed roadmap of transport solutions for local conditions.

The action plan inspired the city to take responsibility of overseeing operations of 100 new buses, and an additional 300 buses in the due course—an applaudable move for a city that had fewer than 30 buses. The plan also identified a cycle network to improve access to public transport; as a result, the city is in the midst of constructing the state’s first Bicycle Sharing system comprising of 1200 cycles.

Onward and upward, Ranchi’s Parking Policy has inspired other cities in the state, like Jamshedpur, to manage on-street parking. The State too realised the chaos caused by unregulated parking and thereafter adopted the  Jharkhand Parking Regulations—first in India. Jharkhand is also the first state to endorse the Transit Oriented Development Policy that was prepared in consultation with ITDP India.

On account of leveraging the sustainable transport agenda at the national level, the India expanded to the country’s capital, Delhi, in 2016. This gave rise to the policy brief on Women and Transport in collaboration with Safetipin and UN Women. Women represent the largest share of public transport users, yet they face many barriers that limit their mobility such as safety, comfort, convenience and affordability. Empowering women in transport enables them to participate in workforce, thereby creating a societal shift to transform the entire world economy.

The India Programme’s capacity development work, through training workshops and study tours, has been imperative to the success of its projects and policy. The India Programme has trained over 1000 government officials and other stakeholders. Over the years, our knowledge products have not only been used for best practise references, but also endorsed by the government – for example, the National Guidelines for Public Bicycle-sharing for the Ministry of Urban Development, and Street Design and BRT Guidelines for the Indian Roads Congress (IRC).

capacity development

Since 1998, ITDPs’ agenda of improving the quality of life of citizens through equitable and sustainable transport has only magnified in momentum over time. Times have evolved, but our dream remains the same. Take a moment and imagine a 2050: will we design a future where we continue to get trapped in endless traffic while pollution destroys the city, and infrastructure fails to deliver? Or, will we live in ‘smart cities’ where people can zip around town, connected with walking and cycling boulevards and world-class rapid transit. The choice is yours; we chose the latter.

P.S. Dear Mahatma Gandhiji, we are being the change we wish to see in the world today. And, we have been doing it successfully for the past 20 years in India!