ITDP India

Promoting sustainable and equitable transportation worldwide

Three Things Indian Cities Need to do Now to Start the Fight Against Vehicular Pollution 

by

“Winter is coming”—a phrase made famous by the sitcom series Game of Thrones—has found an eerie resonance in India. Much like how the people of Winterfell dreaded the arrival of winter and the mythical evil creatures- the White Walkers, in India, it is not a creature, but the polluted air itself, that is dreaded.  

Though it’s barely November, a thick layer of pollutants is already blanketing the skies, and all eyes are searching for the culprits. Is it construction waste, crackers, or crop burning? However, one source, which remains largely overlooked, and often slides through the cracks, while continuing to remain the biggest challenge- is vehicular pollution. A recent study by the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology confirms this. Conducted in the month of October 2024, the study revealed that stubble burning contributed only 1-2% of Delhi’s total air pollution in the month, while vehicular emissions accounted for a significant 11.2% – 14.2%. This makes vehicle emissions the single biggest identifiable, yet silent contributor to poor air quality, which affects the Indian cities not just in winter but year-round—making it the most urgent problem to address. 

Infact, studies being released year after year all indicate how rapidly the situation is deteriorating. The latest report reiterating this, is the Greenpeace report, which spotlights the alarming situation in South Indian cities specifically, which conventionally were believed to have cleaner air. The data from this report suggests the PM2.5 level in these cities is also no better for living standards, with a few like Hyderabad, Chennai, and Visakhapatnam, seeing levels up to 9- 10 times higher than WHO standard. As explained above, a significant part of these rising pollution levels is contributed by the growing population of vehicles.  

While the sustainable transport sector has long advocated for walking, cycling, public transport, and clean vehicle technology as solutions, it is clear that combating vehicular pollution requires a multifaceted approach beyond that. This blog outlines three key Mantras (strategies) that cities can adopt right now to tackle this growing menace. Some of these have already been implemented/ in the process of implementation in our lighthouse city, Pimpri Chinchwad, which stands as a good example for many other growing Indian cities. 

1. Shift to sustainable modes such as walking, cycling, and public transport  

First, cities should focus on creating not just isolated stretches but comprehensive networks of footpaths and cycle tracks. A well-connected network makes sustainable transport options more convenient and accessible, encouraging people to shift to these modes.  

However, providing just infrastructure may not be enough in most cases. Cities must invest in raising awareness through campaigns to nudge behavior change. Policies and legislative reforms are also crucial to embedding these practices into the city’s fabric. 

What’s a good model to emulate? Many global cities, such as Singapore, have initiated the concept of 15-minute cities. Some Indian Cities have had the chance to adopt this concept, leveraging existing initiatives like the Harit Setu project in Pimpri Chinchwad, which aims to enhance walking and cycling infrastructure in the city. Here, the plan is to make a localised network of connected footpaths and cycling tracks within smaller neighbourhoods, across the city so that people can simply opt to walk or cycle for short distances. Through such interventions, they also get sustainable options for last- mile connectivity. 

A glimpse of Linear Garden street, one of the ideal streets in PCMC which prioritises pedestrians and cyclists

However, while walking and cycling provide a sustainable alternative for short trips, they alone will not reduce congestion or pollution. For longer trips, more and better buses which connect the many networks of roads are the need of the hour to alleviate pollution and congestion. Moreover, improving bus services, including their frequency, reliability, and coverage, is crucial. Buses should seamlessly integrate with other transport modes, such as metro systems, footpaths, and cycle tracks, creating a comprehensive and efficient transport network. This interconnectedness enables commuters to make longer journeys more conveniently, thus making public transport a more attractive option. 

While these suggestions might shift a chunk of road users to sustainable modes, there will still be a section who would opt to use personal/private vehicles for travel because of its convenience. To address the emission concerns for that segment, incentivising cleaner vehicles will be an option.  

2. Incentivise people to use cleaner vehicles

Alongside promoting sustainable modes of transport, cities need to encourage the use of cleaner vehicles. This can be done in three ways: transitioning to cleaner technologies, scrapping older polluting vehicles, and building robust electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure. 

India has already taken a step in this direction by adopting Bharat Stage-VI (BS-VI) emission standards, which significantly reduce emissions from new vehicles. However, cities can push this further by promoting electric vehicles (EVs). Local governments should implement strong scrappage policies that incentivise owners of older, polluting vehicles to retire and scrap them in exchange for financial benefits or rebates on EVs.  

Cities also need to upscale their EV infrastructure, particularly by setting up widespread charging stations. A comprehensive EV Readiness Plan can guide cities in developing this infrastructure and ensuring that the transition to EVs is smooth and well-supported. 

For example, Pimpri Chinchwad’s Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan 2023 outlines some of these, by setting a goal of having 30% of the new vehicle registrations in city shift to EV by 2026.  They are doing so by establishing 100 EV charging stations and offering incentives for e-auto drivers. Property tax rebates are also being offered to those setting up charging point in their properties. Furthermore, the PCMC’s and Pune’s shared bus service, Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd (PMPML), already operates 473 e-buses—India’s third-largest fleet—and is continuing to expand its fleet. These efforts – both on the front improved vehicle technology and on the front of emission reduction through improved public transport, not only reduce emissions but also set the stage for a future where EVs become the primary mode of motorised transport. 

Cities infact can go a step further, to effectively promote the use of cleaner vehicles. They can go for a dual approach of simultaneously making it more challenging to rely on personal vehicles.  

An electric bus from PMPML fleet

3. Discourage the use of personal vehicles through pricing parking and LEZs 

Cities must make it harder for people to rely on private vehicles, especially older, polluting models. Two effective ways to achieve this are by pricing parking and establishing Low Emission Zones (LEZs). 

Proper parking management can reduce the number of vehicles on the road by making it expensive to park in public spaces. When parking fees are levied, people think twice before using their cars, potentially avoiding the trip, opting for shorter trips, using public transport or finding other alternative solutions instead. This approach not only discourages unnecessary vehicle use but also frees up critical street space for creating vibrant public spaces on street. When authorised designated spots are demarcated by the city on the streets, it further reduces the time and fuel wasted in searching for a parking spot.  

Effective parking management can deter vehicle use, while LEZs take it a step further by restricting the most polluting vehicles from entering key areas. Together, they provide a strong mechanism to reduce vehicular emissions. 

In an LEZ, only vehicles with low or zero emissions—such as electric vehicles or those that meet the recommended emission standards (BS-VI)—are allowed to enter. LEZs can be city-wide or focused on strategically selected areas, making them an effective tool for cutting emissions in densely populated regions. 

For instance, in cities like London there has been a drastic reduction. As per the Mayor’s report, London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), launched in 2019, has led to a 44% reduction in nitrogen dioxide levels and a roughly 30% decrease in traffic in central areas, alongside a 21% increase in cycling. 

In India, a study by ITDP India and ICCT in Pimpri Chinchwad found that restricting pre-BS-VI vehicles in a designated LEZ could reduce PM 2.5 emissions by up to 91% within a year (if all the pre-BS-VI users switch to EVs). Without such measures, pollution levels will decrease by only 50% in the next five years, under current practices (which involves the expected business as usual gradual natural transition to BS-VI). 

Designated parking spaces created on a street in PCMC

While these three Mantras provide a holistic approach to combat vehicular emissions, acknowledging the issue is the first step.  We urge cities and policymakers not to let air pollution caused by vehicles fade into the background or be treated as a seasonal issue. Addressing vehicular emissions requires year-round effort—mode shift, cleaner vehicle technologies, and Low Emission Zones must work in tandem to tackle pollution from all angles. 

Written by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communications and Development, ITDP India

With technical inputs from Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India

Answers to Some Common Questions About Low Emission Zones

by

With the idea of Low Emission Zones (LEZs) gaining steam in India, here are a few concepts on the Legal, Institutional, and Technological aspects of vehicular emission.

A recap of Urbanlogue 4.0 Episode 2

LEZs are the need of the hour to arrest the invisible yet harmful impact of vehicular pollution. However, the entire subject can be challenging to grasp. Alongside figuring out the enforcement technology and monitoring, in India, data quality and impacts on marginalised communities add to the complexity. 

On September 18, ITDP India and ICCT hosted a webinar featuring six experts, moderated by Amit Bhatt, India Managing Director, ICCT, wherein they unwrapped these concepts by sharing their journeys from managing air/vehicular pollution in cities like Delhi, Pimpri Chinchwad, and Surat, alongside insights from Brussels and Seoul. You can watch the full webinar here. 

Here are seven frequently asked questions around Low Emission Zones, which were answered during  the webinar. 

1. What are the technologies available to enforce Low Emission Zones and which is best suited for Indian context? 

Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India, highlighted two key enforcement methods for India: Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). 

“What’s currently feasible in India is ANPR, which uses cameras to read vehicle number plates and deduct fees for entering Low Emission Zones,” Visariya explained. GNSS, an alternative, connects to an on-board unit inside the vehicle via a cellular network to charge fees, though the unit costs INR 8,000-10,000. 

Srinivas Ganji, Solution Delivery Director (Urban Transport), Arcadis, discussed the challenges of both. ANPR faces issues like low visibility due to weather, traffic congestion, and low-light conditions. However, due to improved algorithms and infrared cameras, the efficacy of ANPR system is close to 90%.  

Regarding GNSS, Ganji pointed out a few concerns. “A lot of incentives will have to be given to maintain the onboard unit. Privacy is also a concern as all movements can be tracked and it’s still a question on who will bear the charges of transmission of the data.”  

2. Are our vehicle emissions measuring methods robust enough? 

Vaibhav Kush, Researcher at ICCT, highlighted the importance of accurately monitoring emissions for implementing LEZs. Currently, India measures pollution at two stages: during vehicle prototype testing before the production and through Pollution Under Control (PUC) checks. However, these methods only reflect emissions under controlled conditions, either in labs or when vehicles are stationary. Neither show actual pollution levels emitted. Factors like load, maintenance, driving habits, road surface, traffic congestion impact emissions. 

ICCT’s 2022 study in Delhi using the roadside sensors revealed a significant gap between tested and real-world emissions.   

3. What are the various legal routes to implement LEZs  

Vaibhav Kush, further elaborated on the legal routes to establish LEZs. He explained that LEZs require legal backing for notifying the LEZ area, restricting polluting vehicle type, imposing fines and more. There are legal provisions available at national, state and city level. It depends on which government is initiating it. Vaibhav highlighted the cases of vehicle restrictions implemented in Delhi, Taj Trapezium Zone in Agra, Kevadia in Gujarat. He also highlighted a case where judiciary (Supreme Court) ordered the Delhi government to levy the environment compensation charge. 

He highlighted that the Air Act of 1981, Central Motor Vehicle Act of 1988 and state laws like Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act 1949, can enable LEZ implementation. 

4. How robust should the city’s pollution monitoring network be? 

Ronak Sutaria, Founder and CEO, and Kevin Joshi, Product Engineer and Researcher, from Respirer Living Sciences, emphasised the need for robust and dense pollution monitoring networks to implement LEZs. For Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC), they deployed low-cost monitoring machines to measure PM 2.5 and 10 across 20 locations, focusing on densely populated areas. The data was shared with SMC and revealed nuanced results—PM 2.5 levels spiked during morning rush hours at certain junctions, while industrial areas peaked in the evening, and commercial zones showed higher levels during weekends. Regular analysis enabled tailored decisions and actions. 

“We need data analytics specialists, to help city corporations make informed decisions,” Joshi stated. 

On data accuracy, Ronak also highlighted that it is important to understand the purpose of using the data. Based on technologies and their cost, data accuracy can vary between 70%-90%.  

5. Is crowdsourcing of pollution data the way ahead for monitoring and predicting pollution levels in micro levels? 

Dr Suraj Ghosh, Associate Counsellor from CII- ITC Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Development, shared that their pollution monitoring and forecasting model was built on crowdsourced data. Their new model integrates emission inventories, meteorological data, live traffic, ambient air quality, and sensor data. By applying the Chemical Transport Model, they can predict pollutant levels for the next 72 hours, which aids measures like the Graded Response Action Plans. 

Their model achieves a resolution of 1 km x 1 km down to zone and ward levels, with the potential to enhance accuracy to 200 meters, though data quality remains a concern. “To improve accuracy of forecasts, we need good data,” he shared. 

6. What can cities in India learn from international cities like Brussels, Seoul, and London? 

Anindita Ghosh, Senior Researcher, UITP, shared several insights from different cities’ LEZ experiences. In Brussels, citizens were proactive in pushing the government to implement LEZs. In Seoul, LEZs were introduced only in the Business Zone, a model that could work in India as well. 

In all these cities, including London, effective communication played a vital role. “Engaging citizens consistently is key. Making them part of the process is essential,” Ghosh said. Various tools such as leaflets, videos, and advertisements were used extensively, with communication beginning 2-3 years before implementation. Efforts were also made to include marginalised communities, a practice that should be adopted in India. 

7. How can we address equity issues on marginalised communities while implementing LEZ? 

Globally, cities have provided incentives to encourage the transition to cleaner vehicles. Cities have provided free public transport passes for two years. Financial incentives are priortised for e-cycles and small freight vehicles for businesses, subject to polluting vehicles being scrapped. Incentives for personal cars are avoided to reduce congestion. All cities invest heavily in improving public transport, walking and cycling infrastructure. Indian cities, similarly, must priortise to improve public transport (especially bus transport) and offer target incentives after analysing the budget. 

Watch this space for more on Low Emission Zones! Join our Whatsapp group now for more webinars and talks!


Team Urbanlogue 

Written by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communications and Development, ITDP India

With technical inputs from Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India

Gaav tithe Rasta, Rasta tithe E-bus: Where there is a road, there will now be an e-bus

by

Exploring Maharashtra’s ambitious E-bus rollout plans 

With the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) observing its 75th anniversary in June 2023, its motto— ‘Gaav tithe rasta, rasta, tithe ST’, meaning ‘Where there is a road, there is state transport’—has truly stood the test of time.  

In 75 years of operations, its ever-growing fleet of over 15,000 buses has relentlessly served every nook and corner of the state, operating nearly 60 lakh kilometres per day. And as it heads into its centenary years, the Corporation has decided to make another ambitious leap – to electrify its fleet. It is in this light, that we look at the Corporation’s plan to electrify 25% of its rural bus fleet, with the addition of 5,150 new electric buses (e-buses) —unheard of in India’s state road transport landscape. 

Why is this important? 

To put this achievement in perspective, traditionally, Indian State Transport Undertakings (STUs) have focused on electrifying city (urban) bus fleets due to the ease and cost-efficiency of setting up urban charging infrastructure. In this context, MSRTC’s decision to order 5,150 e-buses for rural operations is groundbreaking, rooted in this simple but uncommon logic—Why can’t citizens from rural areas, who serve as a backbone to Maharashtra’s economy, enjoy the same quality of service with AC e-buses as citizens in cities? 

This bold move by MSRTC has not only positioned it as a pioneer but has also provided a blueprint for other STUs looking to undertake similar electrification interventions in the future.  

So, how did MSRTC begin this transformation journey for its iconic red buses known as the Red Fairy or Laal Pari? 

How it all began 

While electrification started with the procurement of 150 e-buses under the FAME II scheme in 2021, the true push for transitioning at this scale came with the Bombay High Court (HC) appointing a High Power Committee in 2022 to revive the operations of MSRTC. The committee submitted a revival plan to the Bombay HC which was subsequently approved. This particular plan outlined the need to scale up MSRTC’s fleet size from its existing 15,000 buses to 22,000 buses within just three years by the year 2025. 

To achieve this, MSRTC opted for the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model. The Corporation developed a plan to stagger purchasing of e-buses in two segments—5,150 e-buses and 500 diesel buses on Gross Cost Contract (GCC), and another 2,200 diesel buses on outright purchase.  

This incorporation of 5,150  e-buses will also help them achieve a significant fleet electrification target above 25% by 2025, which aligns with the state electrification policy. 

Lessons from MSRTC’s Journey

While the intent was set right from 2022, there are many lessons to be learned from the MSRTC’s journey, which was not without its challenges. Being one of the first STUs to take up electrification, the path towards it was lesser known.

  1. Ensuring manufacturers customise bus body specifications for rural needs 

When MSRTC set out to procure e-buses for district operations in 2022, no manufacturer was making e-buses to cater to the specific needs of rural operations. Majority of the e-buses were being manufactured for urban settings.  

The Corporation then sought specific models of buses, by adding clauses in the tender for bus body specifications under AIS (Automotive Industry Standards) 34, 52, 153, 140 that have regular floor design and good ground clearance unlike some of the existing variants. This ensured that these e-buses were built with robust quality to navigate to navigate the narrow roads and difficult terrains in rural areas, where roads may not be in the best conditions.  

  1. Identifying the right types of buses  

While district and rural buses serve as the backbone of Maharashtra, serving the routes with medium to low demand with e-buses had to be taken up tactfully. To ensure that the buses procured do not end up running empty, MSRTC decided to procure two types of buses, keeping in mind traffic demand, ridership patterns, load factors, and headway. 

The first type was 12m buses; – 2,800 of the total consignment were of this dimension. These buses are primarily tailored for high-traffic and high-demand scenarios, earmarked for express routes connecting major districts, metropolitan cities, and prominent pilgrim and tourist destinations. 

The second type was 9m buses, totaling 2,350 vehicles, specifically allocated for with mid to low demand routes, emphasising connectivity between district headquarters, taluk-level towns, and villages. These routes often serve as vital lifelines for residents in more remote areas.  

3. Selecting strategic locations for charging infrastructure  

One significant challenge was selecting locations for charging infrastructure. Not all depots could support EV charging infrastructure due to high costs and power supply issues.  

Thus, MSRTC chose depots based on these three criteria: depots with existing operations, ideally located to minimise dead kilometres, and those in close proximity to high-tension power supply lines. 

By selecting depots that fulfilled these three criteria, they could reduce cost for extensive new electrical infrastructure development. Furthermore, depots with overnight bus parking facility for maintenance were also prioritised. 

The depots were also given e-buses in a staggered manner to address any potential operational disruptions due to power supply failures. MSRTC decided that at any point, only 30%-50% of the selected depot fleet will be electric, while the remaining 70%-50% will consist of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)/Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and diesel buses, serving as backup. However, in bigger cities where multiple depots are in proximity to one another, MSRTC intends to develop a few depots as 100% electric depots.  

The total cost associated with this process is estimated at INR 650 crores, for which, MSRTC has sought financial assistance from the state government. 

  1. Selecting the optimum routes to ensure success 

While e-buses are a sustainable choice for the future, to ensure financial viability, the route selection was a meticulous process.  

MSRTC developed a strategy that focused on electrifying routes with the highest ridership, high earnings per kilometre, and the lowest bus replacement ratio. The effort to identify such routes was entirely in-house, drawing upon the extensive ground-level expertise and insights from various divisions within the Corporation. 

Future of the Red Fairy  

The discourse of sustainable transport often focuses solely on urban areas and their residents, highlighting the need for infrastructure like electric buses, cycling tracks, e-vehicles, and so on. 

However, with this one initiative, MSRTC has ensured that an entire generation of citizens from rural areas of Maharashtra will have their first experience in smooth, electric buses rather than noisy diesel-powered ones. This shift has the potential to redefine their perspective on the true benefits of a bus- a mode they will use not out of compulsion, but by choice. 

 As MSRTC moves forward with an alternative fuel strategy beyond electrification, by adding 50 CNG buses to its fleet and retrofitting 6,000 existing diesel buses to operate on LNG and CNG, the move could further push the cause of clean air in rural areas. 

MSRTC’s overall shift to a Gross Cost Contract model for the 5,150 new e-bus and 500 diesel buses, will also enable it to achieve cost efficiency, something which all STUs are aiming for in the long run.  The model helps to mitigate the risks associated with heavy up-front capital investment because the actual purchase of buses is not their responsibility and maintenance expenses e are also taken care of by the contractors.  

With such multi-pronged reforms in place, MSRTC could set a steady course for the next few decades riding on the e-red fairy and being a role model for other transport operators across the country. 

For more insights read the detailed report

Written by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communications and Development, ITDP India

With Technical Inputs from Aditya Rane, Senior Associate – Transport Systems and Electric Mobility, ITDP India

Budget 2024: A Wishlist for Sustainable Transport by ITDP India

by

As the Finance Minister of India prepares to announce the new budget for the country shortly, our diverse team has brainstormed a list of budgetary interventions we wish to see in the upcoming budget and beyond.  

In a post-pandemic world, as our cities grow more rapidly than ever, facing various climate change impacts, our wishlist aims to put ‘sustainability’ at the forefront of our transport and urban policies. Here is a list of five action areas where we seek to see increased focus and budget prioritisation. 

1. Ensuring allocation of Transport Budgets towards Sustainable Mobility  

What we want: At least 50-60% of the total transport budget to be allocated for sustainable mobility projects including public bus transport, e-buses, walking, cycling, micro-mobility, e-shared passenger and freight across Indian cities. 

Why: As per 2011 Census, nearly 72% of trips in India are on foot, cycle, and public transport. It is only fair that the transport budget reflects this proportion, ensuring that sustainable transport receives the attention and funding it deserves. 

2. Prioritising More Buses, Better Buses, Greener Buses 

What we want:  A 15-fold scale-up of national programs like the PM E-Bus Sewa Scheme to ensure More Buses, Better Buses, and Green Buses in all cities with financial support. Financial support should be provided to public bus operators in the form of viability gap funding on Gross Cost Contracts (GCC). 

Electrification of private sector buses, which make up for 93% of buses in India, presents an opportunity for reducing emissions that can be facilitated through lower interest rates for loans, longer loan tenure, and a leasing model. 

Why: Public and private bus transport forms the backbone of Indian transportation, catering to 30 crore daily passenger trips. It is crucial to improve both the quality and quantity of both the public and private buses through prioritised investments in better and greener options.  

With ~20 lakh public and private buses in India. Even if just one-fifth of these buses go electric, it could reduce 85 lakh tonnes of CO2 emissions per year– helping India achieve its 2070 Net Zero vision.  

3.Creating Walking and Cycling Friendly Indian cities  

What we want: Specific budgetary allocation and a national commitment towards creating walking and cycling-friendly streets across Indian cities. All states should be guided towards adopting state-level street design guidelines, policies, and action plans. These must be followed when taking up upgradation or street development work.  

Why: A robust walking and cycling infrastructure provide a highly cost-effective means of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, improving public health, saving money for residents, increasing access to opportunities and improving public safety in cities. For this very reason, world over attempt is being made to increase walking and cycling. But in India, already 48% of the population commutes by walking or cycling, as per Census 2011. This goes to show that we have a strong demand for walking and cycling. 

Despite the clear and significant benefits that investments in walking & cycling infrastructure bring to pedestrians, cyclists, and society at large, this is not adequately reflected in the transport budgets or actions of national, state, and city agencies. The lack of prioritisation for safe walking and cycling infrastructure has been a persistent issue across Indian cities and should be a key focus moving forward.

4.Connecting the Dots: Seamless Integration

What we want: Budget allocation for cities with ongoing and upcoming metro projects to ensure seamless physical, information, and fare integration. The integration should be based on the local area plans, between different modes of transportation including bus, metro, suburban rail, walk, and cycle within a 500m radius of any station area, to encourage a modal shift to sustainable modes of transport.  

Why: Seamless integration plays a crucial role in making people shift to sustainable transport.  The journey must be convenient, seamless, and connected right from planning, boarding, alighting, payments etc. Unless these are integrated, private vehicle users may not shift to sustainable transport modes. 

5. Pricing Pollution

What we want: Provide policy, technical, and budgetary support to states and cities towards adopting parking policies, implementing parking management measures, and setting up low emission zones with a mobility component. These measures can discourage the use of polluting vehicles through pricing and reduce traffic congestion. The national government could encourage cities to develop newer revenue sources by pricing parking and polluting vehicles. 

Why: As per the World Air Quality Report 2023, India is the third most polluted country in the world. Several Indian cities like Delhi, feature in the infamous list of most polluted places in the world. There is an urgent need for separate budget allocation to implement strategies that tackle vehicular pollution and congestion which can lead to lower costs related to road maintenance, healthcare, and fuel consumption. 

Cities can also generate new revenue sources by pricing parking and implementing charges for polluting vehicles. This revenue can be reinvested in sustainable urban mobility projects. 

But how can these be effectively rolled out ensuring accountability for cities? Well, here are some suggestions:  

a. Set up a National Sustainable Mobility Mission, empowered to allocate funds under an Urban Transport Fund, monitor projects, and fastrack sustainability mobility projects across state/cities.  

b. Adopt a result-oriented approach for every project undertaken via the National Sustainable Mobility Mission. For every project, a framework is to be adopted, and budget should be specifically allocated within project costs for ‘Impact assessment of infrastructure’ and performance audit of programs to ensure public money is spent wisely benefitting large masses. 

c. Empower those cities that have an operational Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA) or a Green Mobility Cell to avail the budgetary support from the national mission. These entities should be empowered legally and financially to facilitate coordination, planning, and execution of sustainable transport initiatives among various agencies.  

d. Set up a Green Mobility Data Centre for data-driven decision-making. These data-centres can collect granular and gender-disaggregated mobility data, analyse the same. The collected data can be used for planning, design, budgeting, management, enforcement, and performance evaluation of all mobility interventions and initiatives. 

e. Empower the states and cities to revise existing Motor Vehicle Acts, Municipal and District Acts with rules for prioritising pedestrian-friendly infrastructure to avail the budgetary support. Cities will have to ensure that all upgraded or newly laid out street development will be completed with the provision of safe, continuous, and comfortable pedestrian infrastructure as per the national street design guidelines. 

f. Create a national platform for technical experts who can especially support Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities in piloting and scaling up infrastructure projects. This will ensure high quality planning, design, and implementation of the projects across India. 

g. Mandate state and city transport to make allocations in transport budgets that benefit women, gender minorities, and vulnerable users. It’s enforcement can be done by setting up Inclusive Mobility Committee and/or Inclusion officers. Initiatives such as women-led transport cooperatives for ride sharing services, measures to ensure travel safety, training for these users in roles like drivers, mechanics and engineers should be explored 

As we began compiling our wish list, we realised that what we truly desire is a return to prioritising the basics. We seek strong national commitment to fulfil the 2030 sustainable mobility vision for India, where all cities have: 

A– Accessible and safe streets for all. 

B– Buses near everyone, everywhere, on time. 

C– Congestion and pollution free cities. 

Written by

Team ITDP India

Accelerating Urban Transport Reforms for Effective City Level Action

by

As published in Observer Research Foundation

In the last decade, as India’s urban population surged by 26 percent,1 the use of personal motor vehicles (PMV) grew by 138 percent.2 India took 60 years (1951-2008) to reach 105 million registered vehicles and added the same number of vehicles in the subsequent six years (2009-2015), which put pressure on existing road networks and transport systems.3 The current urban transport governance framework is fragmented, with different agencies managing different aspects of the sector; in Delhi alone, over ten agencies handle transport, including three municipal corporations, the Public Works Department (PWD), national and state highways, the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), and the Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System Limited (DIMTS).4  Such fragmentation leads to a lack of coordination and inefficiencies in project implementation and timelines.

There is an urgent need for reforms in India’s urban transport governance frameworks to ensure effective city-level action that can keep pace with the rapid population growth and its evolving needs. Such reforms will also require interventions at the national, state, and city levels.

National-Level Interventions: Setting the Vision and Funding Mandates 

The National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP), issued by the Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) in 2006,5 was aimed at bringing about comprehensive improvements in urban transport services and infrastructure. The NUTP transformed India’s transport priorities, focusing on the mobility of people rather than vehicles and paving the way for schemes and programmes to support states and cities in improving urban mobility, such as the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM),6 the Smart Cities Mission, 7 and Faster Adoption & Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles (FAME I and II).8 However, the NUTP lacked a definitive vision with specific goals as well as a mandate to enable the funding of state- and city-level initiatives. Consequently, many states and cities struggled to meet the increasing demand for mobility. The approximately 30,000 buses that were introduced across India’s urban districts through schemes like JNNURM 9 10and FAME11 fell significantly short of the 200,000 requirement.12 Therefore, the NUTP highlights the need to establish a clear vision for urban mobility and mandate sufficient funding allocations in order to accelerate reforms.

The Cycles4Change,13 Streets4People,14 and Transport4All15 projects, which were initiated at the national level by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) in 2021, demonstrated a welldefined vision for urban mobility. The programmes have sought to address funds allocation, peer learning, and institutional synergy.

Utilising a participatory approach, the initiatives provided step-bystep guidance to cities to improve their walking, cycling, and public transport infrastructures. They also included a funding component to test solutions in top-performing cities, fostering intra-state competition and enabling city governments to effectively scale up transformation. The effort led to Healthy Streets Apex Committees being formed in over 30 cities, which set goals for projects and programmes to promote walking and cycling.16

Simultaneously, Transport4All Taskforces comprising government and non-government stakeholders were created in 100 cities to improve public transport systems.17 The projects also facilitated knowledge exchange among cities, enabling them to learn from the experiences of others within and outside their state. This collaborative approach led to a rapid improvement in urban mobility infrastructure and services. 

Consequently, 15 cities adopted Healthy Streets Policies to establish a framework towards prioritising walking and cycling. Nineteen cities also developed three-year action plans that laid out goals and strategies to achieve the Healthy Streets vision.18 The plans included strategies and budgets for the city-wide expansion of walking and cycling initiatives, and clearly identified roles and responsibilities of various city agencies towards implementing these strategies. By fostering competition and knowledge exchange as well as providing cities with a clear roadmap and budget for improving sustainable mobility, the initiatives have inspired more than 100 cities to take proactive action towards transforming urban transport in their jurisdictions.19

State Level: Need for State Funding and City-Level Action Mandates

Some states have attempted to address specific aspects of mobility through policies—for example, on electric vehicles or those for transit-oriented development—which have independent agendas and visions. A holistic approach to sustainable mobility through a state-level Sustainable Urban Transport Policy (SUTP) that can guide city-level policies and projects could help these policies be more effective. Such an overarching policy can standardise regulations, allocate the required financial resources to ensure on ground implementation, and facilitate knowledge exchange to drive sustainable mobility initiatives. It can also mandate and monitor city-level actions, ensuring accountability and consistency across jurisdictions.

A few states in India are paving the way for effective urban transport initiatives in cities. In 2017, the Maharashtra Urban Development Department released the draft Maharashtra Urban Mobility Policy.20 Applicable to all urban areas in the state, the policy envisioned modes of transport that are safe, reliable, sustainable, and accessible for all citizens. The policy also included tangible metrics for infrastructure implementation that could measure its success.

To support cities in implementing sustainable mobility projects on ground, the Government of Karnataka set up the State Urban Transport Fund (SUTF),21 administered by the Directorate of Urban Land Transport. Mobilised from three sources—a 1-percent cess on Motor Vehicle Tax (MVT), a 2-percent cess on property tax, and budgetary support from the state—the fund promotes the public transport system in cities by assisting in the construction of city transit infrastructure, implementing non-motorised transport (NMT) systems, and developing projects and feasibility study reports, among others. In 2021, the Tamil Nadu Transport Department secured a loan of INR 1,600 crore (approx. US$200 million) from the KfW Development Bank to procure 2,000 e-buses by 2025 for three cities, including the capital, Chennai, to improve the quality of public transport in these cities.22 Large procurements of electric buses, which are expensive and often beyond the budgets of many cities, could be challenging without state support.

City Level: Need for an Institutional Framework, Policies, and Funding

  1. Setting up robust institutional frameworks The NUTP recommended setting up a Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA)23 in all cities with a population of over one million. UMTAs were envisioned as nodal agencies for all mobility initiatives in a city in order to oversee timely implementation even with the involvement of multiple agencies. They can ensure transparency of decisions across different departments and the accountability of agencies responsible for project delivery. However, very few cities have established a functional UMTA due to the lack of regulatory mandates to form such an entity. 24The Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA) Act, which was passed in 2010 25and has been operational since 2019, has brought key agencies and stakeholders together under a single roof, ensuring the seamless integration and implementation of all transport projects across various modes in the city. As a coordinating body, it has helped integrate transport planning and decision-making in Chennai. Karnataka also formed a Non-Motorised Transport Agency (KNMTA) in 2019 to implement a public bicyclesharing system in Bengaluru, alongside undertaking other NMT activities in the state.26 Similarly, Pune has set up taskforces and cells to oversee the planning, implementation, and maintenance of various NMT initiatives, including27 a participatory NMT Cell to support the transformation of streets across the city.28
  2. Adopting progressive policies and plans There is a need for specific policies and roadmaps that address various aspects of sustainable mobility in cities, including active transport infrastructure for walking and cycling, public transport, parking management, transit-oriented development, low-emission zones, and electrification. These policies must embed the principles of sustainable mobility into the city’s transport-related decision making. At present, Indian cities lack the processes that could enable data-based decision-making. Well-designed policies and roadmaps with clear, actionable, measurable targets can help cities monitor their successes and shortcomings, hold relevant stakeholders accountable for implementation, and ensure data-driven decision-making. For instance, Chennai and Pune have adopted urban mobility policies that prioritise walking, cycling, and public transport. Starting in 2014, Chennai adopted India’s first NMT policy, which inspired Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad to adopt the same.29 In 2016, Pune adopted India’s first progressive parking policy,30 inspiring Chennai to also start a similar exercise. These policies have initiated a move towards sustainable mobility, created best practices and benchmarks, and inspired other cities
  3. Setting the right budget Cities remain at the forefront of implementing transport policies and projects, as they have a better understanding of their unique challenges and opportunities compared to other levels of government. Therefore, they are best positioned to efficiently allocate resources to meet ever-changing urban demands. City-level budgets are critical for public transport services. City-level budget allocation also reduces the burden on state and national governments. For example, the twin cities of Pune and PimpriChinchwad have consistently allocated at least 25 percent of their annual transport budget for the last five years towards improving walking, cycling, and public transport infrastructure.31 Similarly, the Greater Chennai Corporation launched the Chennai Mega Streets Programme 32 in 2020 to create a city-wide network of streets that have a lifespan of at least 30 years, with funds allocated in the 2020 Tamil Nadu budget for the preparation of detailed project reports (DPRs) and commencement of work. 33

Addressing the complex challenges of urban transport governance demands concerted efforts at multiple levels of governance, from overarching national policies to city-level initiatives. The national government needs to set the right vision, backed by strong funding mandates for states and cities, while facilitating peer-topeer learning between cities and states to accelerate transformation. As demonstrated in Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu, it is critical for states to support cities in implementation through policy and funding and mandating city-level action. Additionally, cities need to set up strong institutions such as CUMTA, adopt progressive policies as in the case of Pune, and allocate financial resources to meet ever-changing urban demands to ensure effective action.

Learning from successful experiences can pave the way for sustainable, efficient, and inclusive urban mobility systems. The journey to transform urban transport is long, but with the right policies, funding, and city-level action, it is a goal that could prove to be within reach.

Written by

Sivasubramaniam Jayaraman, National Lead and Senior Programme Manager in charge – public Transport system and TDM

Vaishali Singh, Manager – Transport Systems and Electric Mobility

  1. World Bank, “Urban Population (% of Total Population) – India,” 2022,
    https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?locations=IN ↩︎
  2. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, “Road Transport Yearbook(s), 2008,
    2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016,” https://morth.nic.in/road-transport-year-books ↩︎
  3. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, “Road Transport Yearbook(s), 2008,
    2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016” ↩︎
  4. “Too Many Agencies Monitoring Public Transport in NCR, Need Revamp: Panel,” The Indian Express,
    August 29, 2013,
    https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/too-many-agencies-monitoring-public-transport-inncr-need-revamp-panel/ ↩︎
  5. Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, National Transport Policy, Ministry of Urban
    Development, New Delhi, 2006, https://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/TransportPolicy.pdf ↩︎
  6. Ministry of Urban Development and Ministry of Urban Employment and Poverty Alleviation,
    Government of India, Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission, Overview, New Delhi,
    https://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/1Mission%20Overview%20English(1).pdf ↩︎
  7. Smart Cities Mission, “Vision of Smart Cities Mission,” Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs,
    https://smartcities.gov.in/ ↩︎
  8. Ministry of Heavy Industries, Government of India,
    https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1942506 ↩︎
  9. K.C. Sivaramakrishnan, “Urban Transport: A Bus to Nowhere,” The Economic Times, April 20, 2009,
    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/view-point/urban-transport-a-bus-to-nowhere/
    articleshow/4422393.cms?from=mdr; Ministry of Urban Affairs, Government of India, “Procurement
    of 10,000 Buses and Ancillary Infrastructure,” 2013. ↩︎
  10. Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, “Recommendatory Urban Bus Specifications –
    II,” 2013, https://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/Urban-Bus-Specifications-II.pdf ↩︎
  11. Ministry of Heavy Industries, Government of India, “Status of Sanction of Electric Buses Under FAME
    India Scheme II,’ Ministry of Heavy Industries, https://dash.heavyindustries.gov.in/dhieb ↩︎
  12. Calculated by ITDP India ↩︎
  13. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, “India Cycles for Change (IC4C) Challenge,”
    https://smartcities.gov.in/India_Cycles_for_Change ↩︎
  14. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, “Streets for People Challenge,”
    https://smartcities.gov.in/Streets_for_People_Challenge ↩︎
  15. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India,
    https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1874732 ↩︎
  16. ITDP India, “10 Things that Shaped Out 2022,” https://www.itdp.in/itdp-indias-year-end-roundup/ ↩︎
  17. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India,
    https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1874732 ↩︎
  18. Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Streets for People, Pathways of Change from India’s Smart
    Cities, New Delhi, 2023,
    https://smartcities.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-03/Street%20Compendium%202023%2018-12.pdf ↩︎
  19. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India,
    https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1739905; Ministry of Housing and Urban
    Affairs, Government of India, https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1790637; Ministry of
    Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India,
    https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1874732 ↩︎
  20. ITDP India, “Maharashtra Urban Mobility Policy,”
    https://www.itdp.in/maharashtra-urban-mobility-policy/ ↩︎
  21. Directorate of Urban Land Transport, “State Urban Transport Fund (SUTF),” Urban Development
    Department, Government of Karnataka,
    https://dult.karnataka.gov.in/69/state-urban-transport-fund-%28sutf%29/en#:~:text=The%20
    Directorate%20of%20Urban%20Land,support%20from%20Government%20of%20Karnataka. ↩︎
  22. Julie Mariappan, “Tamil Nadu Receives Rs 1600 Crore from German Aid Agency,” The Times of India,
    September 27, 2019,
    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/tamil-nadu-receives-rs-1600crore-loan-fromgerman-aid-agency/articleshow/71319544.cms ↩︎
  23. Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, National Transport Policy 2006. ↩︎
  24. Dhaval Desai, “Lost in Transit: Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA),” Observer Research
    Foundation, January 8, 2022,
    https://www.orfonline.org/research/lost-in-transit-unified-metropolitan-transport-authority-umta ↩︎
  25. Government of Tamil Nadu, “Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority Act 2010,”
    https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/13110/1/cumta_act.pdf ↩︎
  26. Directorate of Urban Land Transport, “Karnataka Non-Motorised Transport Agency (KNMTA),” Urban
    Development Department, Government of Karnataka, https://dult.karnataka.gov.in/127/knmta/en ↩︎
  27. ITDP India, “Chennai Non-Motorised Transport Policy,” ITDP India,
    https://www.itdp.in/maharashtra-urban-mobility-policy/https://www.itdp.in/resource/chennainon-motorised-transport-policy/#:~:text=The%20Chennai%20Corporation’s%20Council%20
    adopted,greenways%20and%20other%20NMT%20facilities ↩︎
  28. Pune Municipal Corporation, Pune Smart City, Pune’s Sustainable Transport Journey, Pune, 2021,
    https://www.itdp.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Punes-Sustainable-Transport-Journey.pdf ↩︎
  29. ITDP India, “Chennai Non-Motorised Transport Policy,”
    https://www.itdp.in/maharashtra-urban-mobility-policy/https://www.itdp.in/resource/chennainon-motorised-transport-policy/#:~:text=The%20Chennai%20Corporation’s%20Council%20
    adopted,greenways%20and%20other%20NMT%20facilities ↩︎
  30. Pune Municipal Corporation, “Public Parking Policy 2016,”
    https://www.pmc.gov.in/sites/default/files/project-glimpses/PMC-public-parking-policy-Englishrevised-March2016-Final.pdf ↩︎
  31. Keshav Suryanarayan, “Pune Leads India Towards a Sustainable Future,” ITDP India, January 2020,
    https://www.itdp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Pune-Leads-India-Toward-a-SustainableFuture-ITDP.pdf ↩︎
  32. Komal Gautham, “Greater Chennai Corporation Fast Tracks Mega Streets Project,” The Times of India,
    July 15, 2022,
    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/corpn-fast-tracks-mega-streets-project/
    articleshow/92885712.cms ↩︎
  33. “Chennai’s Streets for People: The Journey,” ITDP India, February 29, 2020,
    https://itdp.in/chennais-streets-for-people-the-journey/ ↩︎

ITDP India Programme: A Decade of Impact

by

Infographic Blog

“All urban residents of Indian cities should have access to jobs, education, and recreation through means of mobility that are safe, affordable, resource-efficient, environment-friendly, and accessible to all.”

Over the last 20 years, the ITDP India Programme has worked with nearly 40 cities across the country to make this vision a reality, impacting the lives of millions. 

We celebrate the completion of a glorious decade of work, and welcome a new one with renewed excitement and anticipation of the possibilities ahead. 

Designed by Keshav Suryanarayanan

Conceptualised by Aishwarya Soni, Keshav Suryanarayanan

Capacity Development Shapes Tamil Nadu Towns for Urban Tomorrow

by

Tamil Nadu is urbanising and based on recent trends, the state is expected to be the most urbanised by 2030. With 11 Tamil Nadu cities being part of the Smart City Mission, it reflects the aspiration and potential that smaller townships hold to become urban centres. This is where capacity building and development exercises help bridge their aspirations with realistic and sustainable solutions.

At this point, many municipalities are growing faster than their projected trajectory, which has begun disrupting the established planning layout. To counter this spurt of growth, municipal officials on most occasions resort to quick fixes or knee-jerk solutions which in the future can further accelerate their woes.  

Taking notice of this worrying development, the Commissionerate of Municipal Administration (CMA), in partnership with the Tamil Nadu Institute of Urban Studies (TNIUS) and the ITDP India Programme, commissioned the capacity building programme on urban planning. The program was structured to help prepare town planners and panchayat officials to create streets and public spaces which meet the standards of upcoming smart cities.

Shifting from streets for vehicles, to streets for all

In the midst of modernisation, a key component of civic planning that is often overlooked is equitable street design. To help towns and municipalities reimagine and structure streets, beyond just accommodating the rampant vehicle population, the India Programme was brought on board to share its expertise in creating complete streets which adhere to every road users need.

As part of the course, the India Programme designed and conducted capacity development sessions for over 240 town planners from about 100 municipalities that was spread across three months.

 

In absence of such interventions, town planners tend to sway to the tune of vehicle-centric planning; this at the expense of safe footpaths and cycling facilities. While carriageways only get broader and footpaths narrower! Hence, such developmental workshops help officials realise the need for equality and accessibility while laying out streets. Emphasis was put on creating and improving infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists—who account as the primary occupants of Indian urban roads.

Making sense of Complete Streets

‘What are Complete Streets?’ When asked to express their understanding of the concept, the responses from officials varied from ‘streets that are planned for better vehicular passage’ to it being ‘foreign/alien’ to them.

So, what are Complete Streets?

Complete Streets are street layouts that cater to all user groups—regardless of their age, gender, ability, or mode of transportation. They are designed with wide and continuous footpaths, safe pedestrian crossings, separate cycle tracks (where applicable), bus stops designed to enhance convenience, designated on-street parking, organised street vending, and properly-scaled carriageways. These streets are designed to offer the best of convenience and comfort based on local needs and offer spaces for relaxation, play, and interaction.

Understanding the essence of Complete Streets

Since motor vehicles have been dominating every square inch of our urban infrastructure and design plans, the sessions began with a bit of a reality check. Participants, including town planning inspectors, executive officers, and town planning officers, were introduced to general facts such as modal share, infrastructure inadequacies, misconceptions regarding road infrastructure planning, etc.

This turned out to be an important step in the process, as it helped expose the misbelief that motor vehicles transport more people than any other transportation mode. Walking and cycling accounts for 40-50% of the total modal share, and just a quarter of urban trips are on personal motor vehicles.

 

To further quash the fallacy, officials were shown multiple images of vehicle-centric design plans which were riddled with flaws—unusable or absent footpaths, rampant on-street parking encroachments, haphazard pedestrian crossings, etc. On realising the potential threat such single-pronged plan would generate, more officials realised why streets need to designed for all users than just vehicles.

Providing the tools for change

Understanding the flaw is just one part of the solution, the next step required acceptance and gumption to resolve it. Hence, the following session looked to tackle the incessant argument claiming, ‘Our town streets aren’t like cities, they are too small to adopt such measures.’

By sensitising officials to multiple examples of Indian streets, each reclaimed and refurbished according to best practices, many of the skeptics were won over by the effectiveness of the Complete Street programme. For example, the redesign of JM Road and DP Road in Pune; which has been lauded across the country, even winning the Housing and Urban Development Corporation Award and the Volvo Mobility Award 2017.

Further on, the basic components of Complete Streets were broken down and each element was interactively explained to officials.

To further enable their understanding of the concept, ITDP’s resources—such as Footpath Fix and Footpath Design for designing and constructing standardised footpaths and Parking Basics and Park it Right for creating means for a parking management system—were discussed and later shared with the participants for further reference.  

At the pace towns are developing in Tamil Nadu, 2030 does not seem like a distant future. Therefore, such capacity development sessions go a long way to instil concepts of sustainable and equitable mobility culture right at the grassroot levels. In essence, preparing these townships to meet their aspirations and ensure it is done for the people and not vehicles.

Written by Rohit James

Edited by Kashmira Medhora Dubash

Free parking is not a right, but a blight!

by

In the 1970s when Joni Mitchell crooned “Big Yellow Taxi”, not many realised the clairvoyance and the forewarning that the song’s lyrics expressed. Though every bit of the lyric has its own essence and social messaging, the starting couplet is resounding. The verse—“They paved paradise, And put up a parking lot”—held a mirror up to society, and here we are four decades later, perplexed and baffled as to how we got here.

Automobiles are the scourge that drive up emission levels and other environmental issues, yet their numbers continue to rise unabashed. As per a report by the Centre for Science and Environment (Delhi), it took India 60 years (1951-2008) to cross the mark of 105 million registered vehicles. The same number of vehicles were added in a mere six years (2009 – 2015) thereafter!

But when you throw ill-conceived parking systems into this mix, it is like taking gasoline to a firefight. The backlash of this self-inflicted problem is found in every nook and corner of our cities, in all sorts of positions (angular, parallel, perpendicular) and scales (on-street, multi-level, automated).

In India, the conversation surrounding parking management is kindled every now and then, only to be impounded with plans of creating more parking spaces. Or even worse, buried six-foot deep with a parking lot as a symbolical headstone. Irony at its best.

So, why is it that dialogues on parking and its management generate public ire, whereas implausible measures—such as unchecked on-street free parking and multi-level parking—venerated. The answer lies in the psyche of vehicle owners and commuters in general, who lay fodder to a whole bunch of myths regarding parking management.

Now, what are these myths and how do the arguments hold; well, not as solid as the ground their vehicles are parked on.  

Let’s deduce this argument with the adage, “Your liberty to swing your fist ends just where my nose begins”. A citizen has the liberty to own a vehicle, but it doesn’t entitle them to occupy a public space of their fancy. Furthermore, no text, context, and subtext of a right allows for the infringement of someone else’s right. Whereas, parking poses as an obstruction for someone to use that common public space from walking or cycling.

Clearly, parking is not a right or an entitlement, but a privilege which needs to be charged and heavily at that.  A parking fee must be charged proportional to demand, factoring in criteria such as location, time of day, duration of parking, and category of vehicle (defined by size and type).

Take the case of Ranchi, where a pilot parking management project on the arterial MG Road stretch led to a 12-fold increase in parking revenue. Even the state of Jharkhand, spurred by the revenue spike at Ranchi’s pilot parking management project, invested efforts to regulate parking as a statewide policy. According to reports, Greater Chennai Corporation stands to gain Rs 55 crore per year in revenue from the pricing of about 12,000 ECS (equivalent car spaces) of parking in Chennai: a whopping 110 times increase in revenue from what it presently earns. 

Cities can innovatively use parking revenue to encourage sustainable modes of transport. For example, Bicing—the public cycle-sharing program in Barcelona—is financed by its parking revenue. London’s Freedom Pass, which allows elderly (60+) and disabled residents to use public transport for free, is funded by the parking fees collected in many boroughs. You can find more about these cases and other best practices in ITDP’s publication, Europe’s Parking U-Turn: From Accommodation to Regulation.

As per Dalia Research, the average global commute time per workday is 1 hour 9 minutes, India’s commute estimate hovers around 1 hour 31 minutes. That figure helps us to the third spot in the global list, behind only Israel and the UAE. So does the solution of offering more parking space offer a concession on congestion, the answer is and has always been in the negative.

An analogy often used while talking about urban commute is “Travel time was so much lesser when there were lesser vehicle!”. Hence, parking is to private vehicles, what flame is to moths. More parking only begets more private vehicles to hit the road.

An excessive supply of parking will only encourage people to use personal motor vehicles—even when good public transport is available. Cities, therefore, need to limit total parking supply, including off-street and on-street parking. Based on the capacity of the road network, cities must set caps on the total quantum of parking available in each zone.

Most cities invest in developing multi-level car parks to resolve parking woes. But examples, from across the world and India, clearly indicate that it is a myopic attempt. Over time such infrastructures only turn into ‘big white elephants’.

Take the example of Bengaluru’s 11 multi-storeyed parking complexes—Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Company (BMTC) owns nine and the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) owns two. According to a Bangalore Mirror report, these “ghost storey” parking lots barely have 20-30% occupancy, reason being parking on roads or pavements is easier, since it is free and the safer.

“Multi-level car parking doesn’t solve parking woes, better on-street management does. Multi-level parking structures remain empty while people continue to park on the streets as long as it remains free and unenforced,” said Shreya Gadepalli, ITDP India Programme Lead. Thus, cities must manage and enforce on-street parking effectively before building any off-street parking facilities, public, or private.

In 2009, Janette Sadik-Khan, the then transportation commissioner of New York City, envisioned Times Square to be a car-free zone. That is, the hub would be less of a conduit for vehicles and an urban space where people could freely walk, sightsee, dine, and take in the magnanimity that is New York. Though there were initial reservations, the results were quite remarkable and by 2010 the changes were made permanent. Citylab reported that “business for merchants in the area was booming, and travel times for cars actually went down”.

There are plenty of such examples be it Hong Kong—where demand for commercial establishments rose post pedestrianisation, Copenhagen—a pilot pedestrian project from 1962 has since reclaimed 100,000 sq.m of motorised transit. Here in India, the Mall Road in Shimla, Temple Street in Madurai, and Heritage Street in Amritsar are examples of how reinventing urban design to focus on pedestrianisation does not affect commercial establishment as feared.

People over parking: regulations allows better streets, better cities, better lives

In conclusion, the need of the hour is to regulate parking, not to take it off the table. Policies which focus on parking management not only help in easing congestion, emissions, and travel time, but also are a feasible revenue generation model for a city. A robust management system clearly defines parking zones, pegs user fee to demand, and uses an IT-based mechanism for information, payment, and enforcement—discussed at length in ITDP’s Parking Basics.  

The conversation revolving around parking management has been catching up, with ITDP India Programme offering plausible solutions to cities. Leading the conversation is Pune, which is on the verge of implementing a parking management policy—a demand-based parking system that smoothens traffic movement.

Multiple studies allude that personal cars and two-wheelers occupy most of our street space, yet serve less than a fourth of all trips. They also sit idle for 95 per cent of the time—consuming over a third of street space that could be used more effectively as footpaths, cycle tracks, and bus rapid transit (BRT). The discourse over urban mobility shouldn’t revolve around parking, rather the onus must be on transit-oriented development. Wherein, last-mile connectivity and rapid system of transit ensure movement of people and not just vehicles. As cities evolve, there is an urgent need to step away from an oblivious “man proposes and parking disposes” mentality.

More resources from ITDP on parking management and reforms:

Parking Basics

Park it right

InFocus: Revolutionary Parking Reforms

Parking: Searching for the good life

Sizing Up Parking Space

U.S. Parking Policies: An Overview of Management Strategies

[Webinar] How can Indian cities construct a future for walking

by

Join our webinar to hear how Indian cities can construct safe and attractive footpaths that are accessible by all.  The webinar will introduce our publication – Footpath Fix – that provides guidance on footpath construction details, especially that of different utilities.

Many Indian cities have begun to acknowledge the fundamental role of walking in everyday life but are stuck at getting the details right. This short guide is more of a cheat-sheet for urban designers, municipal engineers, and contractors on how to implement footpaths in complex urban environments. Everyone who has seen it is raving about it.

Download your own FREE copy!

Register to RSVP 

Date and time: Thursday 16 August, at 6pm IST
Speaker: Nashwa Naushad,  Research Associate – Urban Development, ITDP India
Pranjal Kulkarni, Research Associate – Urban Development, ITDP India

Maharashtra Urban Mobility Policy

by

If life is a theatre, then commuting on Indian urban roads is a Greek tragedy that unfolds daily. Jostling for space, dashing to beat a signal or tip-toeing around oncoming traffic, all these are daily reminders of how desperately the Indian transport system needs an overhaul. According to a Boston Consulting Group survey, a commuter in Mumbai spends 135% more time in road travel than any other Asian city.

Yet, our current vehicle-centric transportation planning only adds more vehicles on roads. And beating congestion by adding more roads is a battle that no city has won. It isn’t just the rapid increase in congestion, traffic snarls or travel time, but also the subsequent rise of pollution and road accidents that hamper quality of life in our cities.

“Every rupee spent by a city on public transport boosts its economy by four rupees!” said Mr Khatua, Director of Mumbai Technical Support Unit, at a workshop on the Maharashtra State Urban Transport Policy. Succinctly put, the senior officer magnifies the need of the hour: sustainable public transport systems.

Closely looking at Maharashtra’s urban population, it is expected to increase by a whopping 30% in the next decade and by another 50% in the years to follow. Going by the present-day scenario of urban commute in the state, the future seems too hazy. To counter these issues, the Urban Development Department of the state has drafted and published the Maharashtra Urban Mobility Policy.

With sustainability at its core, the policy looks to develop transport systems in accordance. So efforts will be concentrated on urban transit systems which reduces burden on resources and most importantly, offers an equal space to every commuter. Hence, facilitating walking, cycling and usage of public transport.

How the policy came about

In 2006, the National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP) was laid out as a guidance for transportation planning in Indian cities. It prioritized the movement of people and not vehicles in cities, emphasizing on adequate road space for sustainable transport modes, such as walking, cycling and public transport. However, the NUTP mostly existed as a term of reference on papers.

You may ask, so why bring it up now? Well, Maharashtra is taking strides to plug this gap, making it the first state to define its own transportation policy. This further ensures that its urban transportation projects are consistent with NUTP. In June 2017, the Urban Development Department released a draft of the policy. To ensure transparency and insight on feasibility the process was participatory, taking into consideration comments and suggestions of citizens and officials from various cities.

Consultation with Pune Municipal Corporation

Consultation with Nashik Municipal Corporation

In all of this the ITDP India Programme provided technical guidance to the Urban Development Department, and the department is now in the last stages of finalizing the draft.

What it offers

Applicable to all urban areas of the state, the policy envisions transport modes which are safe, reliable, sustainable and accessible for citizen from all walks of life. Additionally, focusing on women’s safety.

The key objectives that the policy will enforce upon cities are:
· Safety and convenience offered to pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users.
· Reducing usage of personal vehicles
· Our transportation infrastructure must be is universally accessible
· Road fatalities should be drastically reduced
· Ambient air quality should meet or exceed Central Pollution Control Board norms

All this is easier said than done, of course. Hence, the policy offers tangible metrics for infrastructure implementation, followed up with support and training provided by the state government.

The policy also helps to detangle the bureaucratic red-tape and ensures a coherent approach is in store. Cities with a population of 10 lakh or more are expected to establish a Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority and an Urban Transport Fund to manage financial resources for all transportation projects. This will ensure that each agency works in coordination and follows an identical vision.

In conclusion, the policy offers a glimmer of hope; and we say glimmer because there are still many a miles to go and stretches to be reclaimed for equal distribution. But this clearly is a step in the right direction which will impact and influence other states to follow suit. In essence, Maharashtra has shown its wherewithal to get with the times and be the trailblazer that leads by example.