ITDP India

Promoting sustainable and equitable transportation worldwide

Pimpri Chinchwad’s Low Emission Zone Strategy Explained

by

For centuries, the idea of running a mile (approximately 1.6km) in under four minutes seemed impossible. This milestone mocked human limits—until 1954, when Roger Bannister, an English athlete, redefined what’s possible. He cleverly broke down the mile into smaller segments, put in rigorous training, aced each sprint, and combined with an unshakable belief in his goal, eventually shattered the record with a three-minute, 59-second mile! Bannister’s feat didn’t just break records; it sparked a revolution, inspiring countless others to follow. Today, breaking the four-minute mile has become routine for elite runners.  

All it took was for someone to believe and champion the process. 

Now, let’s fast forward to the present. Can such an impossible belief — of restricting polluting vehicles across a city by creating Low Emission Zones (LEZs) – help change the way we work towards achieving cleaner air?  

You’ve likely heard the doubts: “How would we even start?” “Which vehicles should we restrict and where?” Yet, just like Bannister proved sceptics wrong, Pimpri Chinchwad is showing us that this too can be achieved by trusting the process. The city, since 2023, has been breaking down the challenge, taking it sprint by sprint, and proving that even ambitious goals for clean air are within reach through LEZs. In PCMC’s case, it is being done through the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP).  

Welcome to Pimpri Chinchwad’s inspiring LEZ journey, one step at a time, supported by ITDP India and International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). These steps were developed collaboratively by both the teams in discussion with city officials, and we strive to learn and refine the process as we move forward. While there’s still a long way to go, the city’s commitment to walking this path shows that meaningful progress is possible with sustained effort.  

Step 1: Assessing Vehicle Inventory to Identify High-Polluting Vehicles 

Every city has vehicles plying on its streets but not many cities are aware of the characteristic of vehicle fleet that is in use, such as their age, engine types as per Bharat Stage (BS) standards, fuel type, number of kilometre they travel within the city, and other information.  The first step towards implementing LEZs is to know the above information through a primary survey or referring the recent vehicle emissions inventory reports.  

Action: Pimpri Chinchwad began its journey surveying about 4000 vehicles across all vehicle types at six petrol pumps and two parking lots, from September to October 2023.  

Image 1: Snapshots from the vehicle inventory survey

Outcome: The study revealed that about 70% are equipped with pre-BS, BS 1, BS 2, BS 3 & BS 4 engines, which are considerably more polluting than the Bharat Stage 6 standard – mandated in India since April 2020. Additionally, it highlighted that about 5% of heavy goods vehicles, light motor vehicles, heavy passenger vehicles and two wheelers are older than 15 years old—beyond the age deemed fit for use due to the release of excessive emissions. Upon further analysis, it was found that 85% of particulate matter (PM), nitrogen-di-oxide (NO2) emissions are coming from two wheelers, light motor vehicles, and goods vehicles. Such findings eventually informed the vehicle restriction strategy for the city’s LEZ. 

Image 2: Findings of the Vehicle- inventory survey. Nearly 70% of the vehicles were pre- BS 6

Image 3: Pollution load of different kinds of vehicles

Step 2: Identifying the Priority LEZ Areas to Restrict Vehicles  

Once the vehicle inventory is computed, the next step is to identify priority areas where vehicles can be restricted. These areas can gradually be expanded to form larger LEZs, with the potential for citywide implementation in the long term. 

Action: Pimpri Chinchwad, with support from ITDP India and ICCT, divided the city into a grid of two-km by two-km. Each of the four-km square areas were then evaluated through GIS mapping, against several criteria including existing pollution levels, population density, and street network density. Further, the presence of alternate modes of commuting such as public transport and improved walking and cycling infrastructure also made certain areas more suitable to initiate the implementation of LEZs. Grids with more schools and hospitals were prioritised to ensure that cleaner air was available for the vulnerable populations first. 

Outcome: After a detailed, data-driven GIS analysis, 15 grids were identified as potential LEZ areas in Pimpri Chinchwad. The shortlisted grids were further delineated into a boundary, based on the road network and other physical geographical factors. However, the city has now announced a city-wide LEZ, where highly polluting vehicles will be restricted across the city for greater impact. 

Image 4: Map of Pimpri Chinchwad with 15 potential grids where LEZs can be implemented.

Step 3: Defining the LEZ Goal and Estimating the Potential Impact on Air Quality 

The next step is to analyse the vehicle inventory data and assess the potential improvements in the city’s air quality from implementing the proposed LEZ in the prioritised area. 

Action: Pimpri Chinchwad conducted an in-depth analysis of the vehicle inventory survey data. Initially considering the scenario of restricting all pre-Bharat Stage 6 vehicles in priority area by 2026 with certain exceptions, the team developed forward-looking LEZ scenarios to evaluate the potential improvements in the city’s air quality if these restrictions are implemented. The analysis revealed that by 2026, if the city restricted vehicles which were pre-Bharat Stage 6 standards within the identified LEZ areas it could lead to a dramatic 80% – 90% reduction in PM2.5 emissions from vehicles. 

Image 5: Comparative analysis of how the city’s pollution levels will fare in different scenarios

Outcome: After carefully assessing the potential and impact of vehicle restrictions, the city is now setting its sights on introducing Environmental Protection Fees for highly polluting vehicles if they wish to enter or move in the city, instead of an outright ban. This game-changing move would ensure that fees are proportionate to the pollution each vehicle type generates, creating a powerful incentive for citizens to start making greener choices at the same time, boosting alternate modes of transport such as walking, cycling and public transport within Pimpri Chinchwad.  

Image 6: Various measures to be taken now and in the future by the city

Step 4: Conducting Stakeholder Discussions and Identifying Legal Pathways 

Large-scale initiatives like this require collaboration across stakeholders and the identification of legal pathways for successful implementation. It is pertinent to bring together all the relevant stakeholders and collate their input and ideas. 

Action: Pimpri Chinchwad began this process by engaging stakeholders from various departments of the Municipal Corporation, the RTO, and the Traffic Police. These discussions aimed to gather their insights, identify gaps, and explore tools and strategies for effective LEZ implementation.  

Outcome: This stakeholder engagement led to a pivotal breakthrough: the idea of integrating LEZs into the city’s existing institutional framework for combating air pollution – Pimpri Chinchwad’s Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP). This has provided the city with a legal instrument to swiftly activate Low Emission Zones when the air quality surpasses ‘moderate AQI’ (101-300). As per Pimpri Chinchwad’s GRAP, a highly polluting vehicle entering the LEZ area can only do so upon payment of an environment protection fee (EPF) ranging between Rs 100-750 depending on the category/type of vehicle. This applies to pre-BS-4 of goods vehicles, 2-wheelers, and personal cars. The Standing Committee approval was received in in September 2024. 

Step 5: Creating Enforcement Strategies for On-Ground Implementation 

Successful LEZ implementation requires a deep understanding of suitable enforcement technologies (including systems for collecting payments/fines) to identify violators and collection of EPF and establishing robust monitoring systems to measure vehicle tail-pipe emissions. The next step is to identify context-appropriate technologies and ensure their effective deployment. 

Action: Pimpri Chinchwad has been conducting expert roundtables and in-depth discussions to develop practical enforcement strategies and select suitable technologies for monitoring vehicle tail-pipe emissions.  

Outcome: After thorough deliberation and a detailed assessment of various enforcement and monitoring technologies, the city has decided to adopt Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) for enforcement, complemented by on-ground personnel. Efforts are now underway to procure and implement this advanced system, ensuring efficient and reliable monitoring on city streets. 

What’s next? 

As Pimpri Chinchwad progresses toward on-ground implementation of LEZs, with support from ITDP India and ICCT, the city will focus on key steps to implement the LEZ, including engaging with state government officials, traffic police, and technocrats to strengthen enforcement systems and policy reforms. The city will also identify complementary interventions, conduct stakeholder workshops and public consultations to gather feedback, and work towards officially notifying the LEZ. A communication plan and media engagement will ensure citizens understand the measures and support the transition towards clean air. 

Conclusion

The journey to establish LEZs in Pimpri Chinchwad is much like Roger Bannister’s historic four-minute mile—breaking down a seemingly impossible goal into achievable steps. Through meticulous data collection, strategic planning, and collaborative efforts, the city is in the process of paving the way toward cleaner, healthier air for its residents. While the road ahead is long, Pimpri Chinchwad is demonstrating that persistence and belief can turn ambitious goals into tangible realities. 

What’s even more inspiring is that, just as Bannister’s feat motivated countless others to push the boundaries of human endurance, Pimpri Chinchwad’s LEZ journey has the potential to ignite a movement across Indian cities. By encouraging cleaner vehicle technology, investing in walking, cycling, and public transport initiatives, and restricting polluting vehicles, Pimpri Chinchwad is setting an example of how ambitious steps can lead to cleaner air and healthier, more liveable cities. This journey could redefine what’s possible for cities across India, paving the way for a more sustainable future. Here’s a starting guide to all things LEZs.

Written by Aangi Shah, Senior Associate, ITDP India
With technical inputs from Siddhartha Godbole, Senior Associate, ITDP India
Edited by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communications, ITDP India

PMPML’s Journey Through Time: How Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad Got Better Public Transport

by

Every single day, nearly 11 lakh citizens rely on Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Limited (PMPML) buses to move across Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad. For a service that’s just under 20 years old, this is no small feat. Despite fierce competition from private vehicles, the occasional pushback against dedicated bus lanes, PMPML has managed to carve out its space as a reliable, sustainable transport option. 

Picture this: today, a Pune resident can board a PMPML bus, ride an electric bus on a dedicated BRTS lane, and pay a fraction of what other modes would cost. Few Indian cities can claim such progress. But this hasn’t happened overnight—over the last two decades, a series of strategic moves have strengthened PMPML’s presence, shaping Pune’s public transport network into what it is today. 

However, the very gains that took years to build now face the risk of being undone. The city’s rapid growth demands more buses, better services, and continued investment—without which, PMPML’s ability to serve Pune’s people will weaken. 

So, what were the key milestones in PMPML’s journey? Let’s dive in. 

Here’s a look at this journey: 

2007: PMPML Formed with BRTS 

PMPML was formed in 2007 through the amalgamation of Pune Municipal Transport (PMT) and Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Transport (PCMT), which previously operated as separate public transportation entities for Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad, respectively. Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad are sister cities with growing urban populations and expanding boundaries. This geographical proximity led to a significant overlap in bus routes and services offered by PMT and PCMT, often causing operational inefficiencies and commuter inconvenience. To address these challenges, PMPML was established as a unified public transport body to serve both cities as well as nearby towns and villages. 

The formation of PMPML was further strengthened with streamlining the BRTS operations. Implementation of the Pune BRTS began in 2006, with Pune being the first city in the nation to adopt BRTS. The project was implemented on pilot stretches from Katraj to Swargate and Swargate to Hadapsar. The project was partially funded under JnNURM, which also led to development of footpaths and cycle tracks as part of the mandates for the funding. ITDP supported Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) and Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) with the design of the BRTS corridors, as well as by creating awareness about the advantages of BRTS. 

2015: Rainbow BRTS expands to more routes

After the success of BRTS in initial pilot routes, additional corridors were inaugurated in 2015. These were the Yerwada-Wagholi and Sangamwadi-Vishrantwadi in Pune, and Sanvi Phata-Kiwale and Nashik Phata-Wakad for Pimpri Chinchwad inaugurated in 2015.

ITDP was involved as a technical partner, guiding PMC and PCMC with refinements in the overall system, leading to consolidation of these corridors under the ‘Rainbow BRTS’ brand. This strategic branding created a unified identity for BRT services across the metropolitan region. 

Rainbow BRTS since has been ahead of the curve as it introduced advanced features, including dedicated BRTS stations with automatic gates, GPS-enabled bus tracking (AVLS), level boarding, passenger information systems, off-board ticketing, and speed tables for pedestrian crossings. PMPML also established a state-of-the-art Transport Command and Control Centre to monitor performance and service levels. Today, the Rainbow BRTS network spans slightly over 60 kms. Its hybrid operational model enabled buses to bypass traffic congestion along dedicated trunk routes while maintaining route flexibility across non-BRTS corridors.

Aerial view of the Phule Nagar Station and Rainbow Bus on the Sangamwadi-Vishrantwadi Corridor (Source: Rainbow Bus, PMPML)

2018

Pioneer in Electric Buses

The next big milestone for PMPML was scripted in the year 2018 when PMPML further enhanced its service with the introduction of electric buses, setting a benchmark for sustainable urban mobility in India.  
They were able to do this with financial support from the Pune Smart City Development Corporation who enabled the procurement of 150 e-buses, making Pune the city with one of highest number of e-buses in India back in 2018. This achievement was particularly noteworthy, as PMPML was not among the various transport undertakings selected under the FAME-I scheme. However, the experience gained paved the way for PMPML to secure financial support for 450 additional electric buses under the FAME-II scheme in 2019. ITDP has been actively assisting PMPML by providing technical support as required for the procurement of electric buses. 

As it is well established now, e-buses are significantly more energy-efficient than Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) buses, with a 12-meter e-bus consuming just 1.3 kWh per km, compared to 2.82 kWh/km for diesel buses and 2.89 kWh/km for CNG buses. This makes electric buses nearly twice as fuel-efficient as their diesel and CNG counterparts. 

In addition to efficiency, e-buses have matched the performance of CNG buses while recording fewer canceled kilometers. A passenger survey revealed that 75% preferred commuting on e-buses due to their superior ride quality, air conditioning, and reduced noise levels. Owing to these factors, PMPML is the only State Transport Undertaking (STU) offering air-conditioned services at standard fares. Since the operating cost of AC e-buses is lower than that of AC CNG buses, PMPML has been able to pass these cost savings on to its passengers. PMPML charges a fare of Rs 5 per km for both non-AC and AC buses. In comparison BEST which provides city buses services in Mumbai has a 20% higher fare for AC buses. (Rs 5 per km for non-AC Buses and Rs 6 per km for AC Buses. The daily passes also vary in fares, with Rs 50 and Rs 60 for non-AC and AC Buses, respectively.

Comparison of Energy Consumption between Electric, CNG, and Diesel Buses

One of the First STU to embrace Gross Cost Contract as way forward 

Speeding up the electrification of fleet was adoption of Gross Cost Contract model by PMPML. The STU did so as a key component of its electric bus procurement strategy. Under this model, PMPML pays operators on a per-kilometer basis, while the operators provide buses, drivers, charging infrastructure, and maintenance. This arrangement shifts financial and operational risks away from PMPML, facilitating the rapid adoption of electric buses without significant capital expenditure. Pune’s pioneering implementation of the GCC model accelerated its transition to electric mobility and served as a reference for other Indian cities.  Furthermore, PMPML continues refining its GCC framework, integrating lessons from past experiences.

2022: Integration with Metro 

PMPML hosted a Foundation Week from 18th to 23rd April 2022, celebrating 15 years of its service. In the months following the Foundation Week, both Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad saw the introduction of Metro services. PMPML has since been actively collaborating with Maha Metro to integrate their services and enhance accessibility for citizens. BRTS stops along the Metro corridor were relocated near Metro stations, aligning with the exit points to facilitate seamless transfers for passengers between the two services. Additionally, PMPML introduced feeder routes to Metro stations to expand the Metro catchment area, further improving access. Information panels were installed at Metro stations to help passengers easily identify and use the feeder services.  In fact it continues to support the citizens of Pune region as an analysis by ITDP India on how the Nigdi-Dapodi BRTS corridor and Pune Metro services, compliment each other’s service found that, despite presence of Metro, the Nigdi-Dapodi BRTS corridor serves 1.5 lakh passengers daily, with 37 buses per hour during peak times, one bus every 1.6 minutes. About 47% of users were students (18-25 years).

Vallabh Nagar BRT Station relocated closer to the Sant Tukaram Nagar Metro Station exit for easier access to passengers.

2024: All-in-One Transit App for Commuting and Seamless Ticketing Across any Public Transport mode 

PMPML has consistently demonstrated a proactive approach to improving its services by collaborating with various agencies and stakeholders. One such collaboration which reaped productive results was through the Transport4All (T4A) challenge. As part of this, PMPML supported startups in developing innovative solutions for modern day challenges which state transport undertakings face. Pune nurtured and piloted three successful solutions, one of which led to the creation of the Apli PMPML app. Building on the multi-modal integration, this app offers digital services to PMPML users, including live tracking, ticket booking, route planning, and more. It also integrates with Maha Metro’s online booking portal, advancing the digital integration of Pune’s public transport system. The Apli PMPML App marks a significant achievement for PMPML considering the popularity and positive reviews of the app, hinting its successful implementation. The same is backed by the staggering 10 Lakh+ downloads of the app in a span of only 6-7 months. 

The Apli PMPML app includes live tracking, ticket booking, bus schedules, and more features

Way forward

Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad have consistently proven themselves as leaders in public and sustainable transportation, setting a benchmark for cities across India. But as these cities grow, so too must their public transport systems. Maintaining ridership alone is no longer sufficient—the goal must be to significantly grow ridership. This calls for scaling up the fleet, upgrading service quality, and ensuring that capacity matches the region’s growing demand. 

To truly meet the mobility needs of the future, operational efficiency must improve, and the passenger experience must be reimagined—with greater comfort, convenience, and safety at its core. Public transport must evolve from being merely a mode of mobility to becoming a seamless, enjoyable part of daily life for all residents. 

As of 2025, in an industry-first, PMPML is set to incorporate qualitative benchmarks into its tendering process—prioritising service quality, operational efficiency, and commuter satisfaction. This strategic shift aims to elevate the passenger experience and reflects PMPML’s growing commitment to excellence. ITDP’s collaborative support has contributed to this evolution, providing technical insights and guidance throughout the journey. 

Having supported PMPML since its early stages, ITDP remains a committed partner in this transformation—working together to deliver innovations and strategies that will help Pune Metropolitan Region emerge as one of the world’s most efficient, accessible, and environmentally responsible public transport systems. 
As PMPML enters its third decade, can it keep up with Pune’s and Pimpri Chinchwad’s growing demands—and bring more people back to public transport? Stay tuned for the next part. 

Written by Jagdish Temkar, Associate, Transport Systems, ITDP India
With Technical Inputs from Aditya Rane, Senior Associate – Transport Systems and Electric Mobility, ITDP India
Edited by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communication and Development, ITDP India

Parking Reimagined: Chennai’s Parking Policy is Paving the Way for Better Streets

by

Commuting in Chennai’s streets often feels like a game of Would You Rather?—except that the choices aren’t fun. 

Would you rather drive in circles for 20 minutes looking for a parking spot, only to settle for an informal parking space with an arbitrary fee? Or walk on the roadside, dodging parked bikes and cars, weaving through traffic, and hoping for a safe path? 

In Chennai, these aren’t just hypothetical scenarios, with a population of 15.37 million and 9.2 million registered vehicles, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) faces a severe parking crunch as there’s nearly two vehicles for every three people in the city. A driver struggling to park in a narrow lane, while a pedestrian—with an elderly companion or child—undertaking challenging obstacles on a short 500-meter walk, dodging haphazard parking one side and speeding vehicles on another- are common scenes we all encounter. 

Sadly, neither choice makes the city easy to move around and aren’t working for anyone, just like how a would-you-rather game has no correct response. 

But can the new parking policy and on-ground parking management be the answer, that can lead to a win-win situation for everyone using the street?  
 
That’s exactly what Chennai has set course for. This year, the city took a historic step toward better parking management by launching a progressive Parking Policy for the entire 5,904 sq. km of the Chennai Metropolitan Area, which includes four corporations – Chennai, Tambaram, Avadi, Kancheepuram, 12 municipalities, 13 town panchayats, 22 panchayat unions and one special grade town panchayat. The policy was developed by the Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA), which will not only plan, design and strategise, but also oversee its implementation and monitoring. 

Since April 2022, ITDP India has been a key technical partner, supporting CUMTA in shaping this landmark policy.  

Stakeholder Meeting with GCC and GCTP in September 2022

This policy not only addresses the city’s growing parking challenges through area-level parking plans, Travel Demand Management measures, but also brought together key stakeholders—including Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC), Avadi and Tambaram Corporations, Traffic Police, Highways, and Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA)—through extensive consultations. 

CUMTA’s Parking Policy: Transforming Urban Mobility  

CUMTA’s newly adopted Parking Policy 2025 is more than just a set of regulations—it’s a transformative approach to managing limited parking space efficiently, reducing congestion, and improving mobility. Here’s a look at its key highlights of the policy: 

1. Managing parking at the area level and creating neighbourhood wide solutions, to prevent spillovers  

What does the policy say?
With the new policy, Chennai is shifting from scattered parking management in isolated streets, to a structured, Area-Level Parking (ALP) Management plan with demand-based pricing, clear regulations, and smart enforcement. The plan allocates parking spots in every street, based on the demand, and uses both ground teams and technology to manage parking efficiently across the neighbourhood. 

Why is it important? 
Managing parking in a few streets isn’t effective and can make the problem worse by causing spillover and more traffic in the adjoining streets. But when we look at a whole area and its network of streets together, we can address the neighbourhood’s need for parking more effectively. This also ensures that street space is used efficiently and is accessible to all street users. By using a demand-based pricing system, we can discourage unnecessary car/bike use and encourage people to choose more sustainable options, like public transport or cycling. 

Site Visit in Anna Nagar Chennai towards preparation of ALP (CUMTA x ITDP India x Street Matrix)

2. Prioritising Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Public Transport users, Before Parking

What the policy says? 
The policy ensures that the city agencies build safe, continuous footpaths and well-integrated NMT infrastructure. The policy gives precedence to footpath allocation over parking.  The policy ensures that parking space is allocated to a street, only after sufficient footpaths and carriageway space is available.    

Why is it important?
More than 60% of trips starts and ends on foot. Poor footpaths/no footpaths push pedestrians onto carriageways, increasing their exposure to moving vehicles and reducing safety. Presence of NMT infrastructure reduces vehicle dependence, easing parking demand, and optimising street space, ensuring safer, more inclusive streets. This way parking plans will also nudge the city agencies to ensure walkable footpath are available, leading to wider footpath coverage. 

Pedestrian Plaza at T.Nagar with On-Street Parking Management.

3. Demand-Based Dynamic Pricing and Smart Enforcement to Shape People’s Parking Behaviour 

What does the policy say?
Parking rates under the new policy will be dynamic based on the area. It will vary, by vehicle size, location of the parking spot, time of day, and demand. On-street parking will be priced higher than off-street options (government or private MLCPs, parking lots, etc.). This will nudge those wanting to park their vehicles for long term (more than 2 hours) to look for off-street options and allowing the on-street parking lots to be open for short terms users. Prepaid parking will replace postpaid models to encourage planned usage.  
As per the parking policy, enforcement measures will be taken up for the following kind of violations: double parking, parking in no-parking zone, parking on footpath, non-payment of parking fees etc. These violations will be discouraged with the use of technological interventions through sensors, cameras, etc. and on-ground parking teams. 

Why is it important?  
Pricing strategies help manage demand for parking, reduce congestion, and discourage personal vehicle user. Only those willing to pay end up coming in cars and bikes, while the rest may turn to other sustainable options.  
For example, T. Nagar, a bustling commercial area, has a higher parking charge of Rs. 60 per hour for cars, while in other areas, the charge is Rs. 20 per hour.  
In contrast, the proposed parking charges for Anna Nagar are Rs. 40 per hour. These rates have been set based on factors such as, how majority of the people commute while visiting the area, availability of public transport, land use, and considerations for traffic management. 
Enforcement strategies are an important tool for behaviour change. The focus of the policy is to not penalise the violator but discourage the violations. By adding penalties and punitive actions to the violations, people’s parking habits can be modified for the better. 

Comprehensive on-street and off-street parking fee strategy at Pedestrian Plaza at T.Nagar

4. Chennai to take a centralised approach to parking management with a Parking Management Unit (PMU) 

What does the policy say?  
The policy establishes the need for a single authority to manage parking holistically. The Parking Management Unit (PMU) will be this single authority and will function under CUMTA. It will be responsible for planning, pricing, enforcement, and implementation across agencies. 

Why is it important?  
A single authority streamlines decision-making, prevents fragmented implementation across agencies, and ensures consistency in pricing, enforcement, and monitoring. In many other cities, this was a critical reason why parking policies failed to bring the results as expected, as the implementation and enforcement were split among multiple agencies. 

5. Policy allows for Legal & Policy Amendments to other key legislations 

What does the policy say?  
For on-street parking spaces: As per the policy, Traffic Police, Urban Local Body, and Road Owning Agency can pass an official order to delegate parking responsibility and enforcement to CUMTA’s PMU. This will ensure seamless management across agencies.  
For off-street parking spaces: The policy recommends amendments to TNCDBR (Development Control Regulations of TN). This will help redefine how much off-street parking must be made provided in any property development. For example, in areas with high coverage of public transport, the overall number of permissible parking lots is reduced. This follows the concept of parking maximums, to ensure people use the public transport that is easily available and are not dependent on personal vehicles. 

Meeting at CUMTA with CEPT-CRDF (TNCDBR Consultant) in August 2023

Why is it important?
Contextualising the existing legal framework is critical for effective enforcement, regulatory clarity, and integrating parking seamlessly into urban planning frameworks.  As per the current legal framework, the parking management roles are fragmented with Traffic Police and Urban Local Bodies on planning, pricing, implementation and enforcement. The new policy allows CUMTA to take up the responsibility from different agencies and be the sole management unit- through the PMU. 

6. Parking Fee collected from the area to be re-invested back in the area 

What does the policy say?
Surplus parking revenue will be ring-fenced for local improvements, including better footpaths, cycling infrastructure, and public spaces. This approach ensures that the benefits of effective parking management are directly felt by the community, enhancing the quality of life and encouraging more sustainable modes of transport. 

Why is it important?
Unlike traditional models where parking fees is looked at as a general pool of revenue, not linked to any one location, Chennai’s Parking Policy ensures that the revenue collected is re-directed to prioritise improvements in that specific location. 
Currently, the annual parking revenue in Anna Nagar is approximately Rs. 35 lakhs. However, with effective parking management, it is estimated that this could increase to Rs. 3.3 crore per year. This is because, the current practice in Anna Nagar involves pricing per parking slot, rather than, an hourly basis, and not all streets have designated parking slots, resulting in an isolated approach. In contrast, the proposed plan adopts a cluster approach with hourly pricing, ensuring a more organised and efficient system. This revenue will be reinvested into improving Anna Nagar’s mobility, streets, green spaces, etc. 

Future-Proofing Chennai’s Streets

The policy also allows for some future-proof strategies like Urban Freight Management, EV charging integration, Travel Demand Management.

  1.   Urban Freight Management: This is a structured city-level and area-level approach to regulate the  movement of goods. This ensures dedicated loading/unloading zones are allocated on the streets  to reduce congestion and improve last-mile logistics. 
  2.  EV Charging Integration: To ensure that streets can accommodate the growing number of electric vehicles (EVs), the parking policy emphasises the need to integrate both on-street and off-street e-charging infrastructure. By planning for EV charging within parking spaces, the policy supports the shift to cleaner mobility. 
  3. Travel Demand Management (TDM): The policy also allows to create customised strategies for schools, workplaces, and commercial hubs by promoting sustainable commuting options, staggered work hours, and shared mobility to reduce peak-hour congestion.  

How will CUMTA ensure this policy is implemented well and monitored? 

Currently CUMTA has kickstarted the implementation of the policy through Area Level Plan in Anna Nagar. They will roll it out by hiring parking service providers who will manage collection of fees, enforcement etc. This will be a pilot intervention, learnings from which will inform future implementation. Since this is a technology driven parking management plan, CUMTA has also initiated the development of a parking app and a centralised command center for monitoring. The implementation of this pilot will be monitored through 14 robust Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).  

Conclusion 

Chennai’s streets, once vibrant corridors of life, now prioritise metal over people. And for years, moving through the city has felt like a never-ending game of Would You Rather?—drive in circles hunting for parking or weave through a maze of parked vehicles on foot. 

The Parking Policy changes that. It doesn’t force citizens to choose between driving and walking or taking public transport. Instead, it ensures that everyone gets their fair share of space on the road. 

This policy isn’t just a document—it’s the end of a bad game and the beginning of a better city. And that’s a milestone worth celebrating. 

By Sangami Nagarajan, Associate Urban Planning,
With Inputs from Venugopal AV, Programme Manager

Edited by Donita Jose

Low emission zones: A roadmap to cleaner air in India

by

As published in IDR Online

Air pollution has escalated from an environmental issue into a full-blown health crisis, impacting people of all ages. Its far-reaching effects are evident in the rising cases of respiratory disorders, chronic illnesses, and even increased mortality.  

In North India, stubble burning, especially during the cooler months, is often considered to be the leading cause of air pollution. However, data indicates that year-round vehicular emissions are a more significant contributor to air pollution than stubble burning, construction, or firecrackers. According to the Emissions Inventory (2020), vehicles accounted for 46 percent of total PM2.5 emissions—harmful to human health—in Pune as well. Vehicles were also the largest source of harmful gaseous pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (73 percent) and carbon monoxide (66 percent). Between 2012 and 2019, PM2.5 emissions from transport in Pune surged by 91 percent, driven by rapid vehicle growth and the widespread use of highly polluting vehicle models.

Cleaner vehicle technology is not enough

To reduce emissions from vehicle tailpipes, the central government introduced Bharat Stage (BS)-VI standards in 2020 for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, which run on fuels such as petrol, diesel, and CNG. These standards set limits on pollutants that vehicles are allowed to emit per kilometre. At the same time, schemes such as FAME India, along with various state and city initiatives, actively promote the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs).

However, ICE vehicles currently outnumber EVs on the road, nullifying any gains in emissions reductions from the latter. What’s more, there continue to be far too many pre BS–VI vehicles in circulation to make any real dent in vehicular pollution. A case in point is a 2023 study conducted by Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) India and International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). The study found that approximately 70 percent of the vehicles plying in Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad are pre-BS or BS-I to -IV, all of which are more polluting than BS-VI vehicles. Estimates show that one pre-BS car pollutes as much as 11 BS-VI cars, while one pre-BS truck pollutes as much as 14 BS-VI trucks.

To further complicate matters, a real-world vehicular emission study in Delhi and Gurugram revealed that BS-VI vehicles also exceed approved laboratory limits. Additionally, emission levels varied by vehicle type. For instance, BS-VI taxis and light goods vehicle fleets emitted 2.4 and 5 times more nitrogen oxides, respectively, compared to BS-VI cars used for personal purposes.

The long-standing mandate for Pollution Under Control (PUC) certification also falls short. The test is ineffective because it does not measure PM and nitrogen oxide emissions, testing only for carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and smoke. Furthermore, PUC assesses pollutants when the vehicle is stationary, not when it is in actual use. Hence, PUC certificates are not reliable indicators of a vehicle’s fitness with regard to its real-time driving emissions.

Low emission zones could be the answer

While encouraging cleaner vehicle technology is one part of the solution, there is also a need to simultaneously restrict the use of highly polluting vehicles.

Low emission zones (LEZs) are designated zones in a city where the use of polluting vehicles is restricted or discouraged. Such zoning aims to improve local air quality and health by reducing vehicle tailpipe emissions. Many cities—including London, Seoul, Paris, Lima, Brussels, and Beijing—have implemented LEZs. 

Cities typically make policies regarding which categories of polluting vehicles to restrict and where to impose these restrictions. Once an area is identified, signages and road markings are mounted to let drivers know that they are entering an LEZ. The rules are enforced by automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras that read a vehicle’s number plate and identify whether it’s compliant or not. Cities like Paris mandate that every vehicle should have a sticker indicating their emission standard (Crit’Air sticker). In addition to these technologies, traditional traffic wardens visually identify violators as well.

But can LEZs be a silver bullet for vehicular pollution? Data from their implementation in London suggests they can in fact provide relief.

London’s LEZ—launched in 2008—now spans the Greater London Area, with approximately 1500 sq km demarcated as an Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ). Its emissions standards are stringent and discourage the use of highly polluting or non-compliant vehicles by charging a heavy daily LEZ fee.

According to Transport for London’s six-month report published in July 2024, the ULEZ has helped reduce harmful roadside nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations across the city. Over the years, the number of non-compliant vehicles driving within the LEZ has gone down as well. Now, a larger proportion of vehicles recorded in the LEZ are cleaner—96.2 percent, up from 39 percent in 2017. Further, a 2023 study by the University of Bath found that pollution reductions from the LEZ led to a 4.5 percent drop in long-term health problems and an 8 percent decline in respiratory issues.

At ITDP, we conducted a similar study in Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) to determine the reduction in vehicular pollution as a result of restricting highly polluting vehicles in an LEZ and shifting users to the least polluting vehicles. Our study estimates that if the city government restricted pre-BS and BS-I to -IV vehicles in a designated LEZ and if vehicle users shifted to BS-VI vehicles instead, PM 2.5 emissions from vehicles could decrease by 80 percent by 2030.

Planning and implementing LEZs in India

LEZs are not new to India. Matheran, a holiday town in Maharashtra, restricts motor vehicle use to preserve clean air. Farther north, highly polluting vehicles are restricted around Taj Mahal to protect the monument from the corrosive effects of greenhouse gases. Delhi imposes an environment compensation (EC) charge on polluting trucks to discourage them from entering the city en route to neighbouring states, compelling them to take bypasses instead.

Over the last year and a half, ITDP India and ICCT have been supporting three cities in Maharashtra—Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune, and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar—in planning and implementing LEZs. The plan includes identifying highly polluting vehicle categories, defining LEZs, estimating benefits, and recommending complementary measures such as improving public transport connectivity and establishing enforcement systems.

In August 2024, the PCMC included LEZ in its Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP), a comprehensive strategy to reduce pollution across different sectors, including but not limited to vehicles. As per GRAP, the city will discourage the use of pre-BS and BS-I to -III private cars, two-wheelers, and light- and heavy-goods vehicles—which contribute approximately 90 percent of the total annual vehicular emissions—when the air quality falls to the moderate to poor category. The city will not ban such vehicles but will impose an Environment Protection Fee ranging from INR 100 to INR 750 daily for entry and movement inside the city.

LEZs must be accompanied with complementary measures like parking management, footpath, cycle tracks and public transport

However, translating policy into practice will require several key actions. Here are some of them:

1. Coordination between government departments

Implementation of LEZ measures will require the city government to set up robust enforcement mechanisms. For one, they will need to engage a variety of stakeholders, including the traffic police, Regional Transport Office (RTO) authorities, environmental agencies, and road departments, and establish seamless systems for coordination and communication. Additionally, the municipal corporation will need to deploy cost-effective and scalable IT-based solutions, such as ANPR cameras, to monitor and enforce rules, for which it will require dedicated funds.

But while city governments are responsible for designing and implementing LEZ frameworks, they often lack the legal authority, resources, or enforcement capacity needed for large-scale changes. State governments can provide the necessary legal frameworks, policy support, and regulatory backing to enable cities to effectively enforce these zones. It is equally important for the central government to be involved in drafting overarching policies, establishing national standards, and providing financial support to ensure that cities have the resources to implement the required infrastructure. The push towards transport electrification offers an example of such multi-tiered governance. The FAME-II policy, for instance, incentivises electric two- and three-wheelers (including e-rickshaws), commercial electric four-wheelers, and electric buses nationwide. At the state level, 21 Indian states have notified EV policies, with 15 offering direct incentives to EV buyers. These policies promote adoption through various consumer-facing incentives, such as purchase subsidies, exemptions from road tax and registration fees, reimbursements, and scrapping incentives.

2. Designing complementary infrastructure

Complementary infrastructure must be designed and funded to provide residents with viable, non-polluting alternatives to private vehicles. These include expanding public transport networks, widening or repaving footpaths, and installing charging stations for compliant vehicles. Barcelona’s Superblocks initiative is an example of an urban planning approach designed to reallocate public space from vehicular use. It reorganises traffic flow within a 3×3 grid of city blocks, prioritising pedestrians and community activities over vehicles. Within each superblock, traffic and non-residential parking are redirected to perimeter roads, significantly reducing vehicle movement inside. Streets within the superblocks are repurposed into pedestrian-centric spaces, with strict speed limits and an emphasis on accessibility. The reclaimed areas are enhanced with green spaces, bike lanes, playgrounds, and public seating, fostering a more vibrant and communal urban environment.

3. Garnering citizen support

Apprehensions about transitioning to cleaner vehicles are common in cities worldwide. For private EVs, the primary concern is the higher upfront cost, while for EV buses, resistance often stems from long procurement and waiting periods. Low-income groups and businesses are particularly impacted by the costs associated with this shift, which may lead to resistance against the policy. Delayed communication about the transition can exacerbate this issue. For instance, if potential buyers are unaware of upcoming restrictions on ICE vehicles, they might unknowingly invest a significant portion of their income in them, only to face policy changes later. This can create frustration and opposition to the transition.

Recognising this, many cities around the world announce such plans at least a year in advance, allowing residents and businesses to make informed choices. Paris, for example, supports small businesses in making the switch by offering financial incentives for cleaner alternatives. Brussels offers information on cleaner vehicle alternatives and financial assistance through its dedicated LEZ website. This website also features a mobility coach, a service that provides personalised advice on mobility options in the city.   

As India advances its efforts to combat air pollution and environmental degradation, LEZs can be a viable solution. By curbing vehicular emissions, these zones can play a crucial role in improving air quality, easing congestion, and reclaiming urban spaces for healthier, more liveable cities. However, their success depends on integrating them within a multi-pronged strategy that includes strengthening public transport, enhancing pedestrian infrastructure, and supporting a just transition for affected communities. LEZs can serve as a starting point for reimagining India’s cities—where clean air is a right and sustainable mobility the norm, with urban spaces that prioritise people over pollution.

Written by Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India

Tamil Nadu Budget 2025: Public Transport Gains, but Walking and Cycling Need More Attention

by

On March 14, the Tamil Nadu (TN) government announced the much-awaited budget outlay for the financial year 2025-26. At the state assembly the Honourable Finance Minister Thangam Thennarasu announced the state budget to have an outlay of Rs.57,231 crore. This is nearly 20% more than the 2024-25 budget when Rs.47,681 crore was the total capital expenditure outlay.  

We at ITDP India analysed the budget outlay across sectors to understand how much allocations was given for sustainable urban transport and urban development this year. This is a critical exercise to see whether the budgets are in line with the state’s overall commitment to Sustainable Development Goals and its other forward-looking policies like Tamil Nadu EV Policy, city level Non-Motorised Transport Policy and Comprehensive Mobility Plans  

Here are some of the key highlights of the allocations, along with our insights and recommendations: 

1. Improving Public Transport- Rs.170 crores

The 2025-26 budget provides dedicated allocation for the enhancement of public transport service, operations, and ridership. 

  1. The budget features two Multimodal Transport Terminals to integrate rail, metro and bus transport, at Guindy and Washermanpet , at a cost of Rs.100 crore, featuring “state of the art” passenger amenities. This project shows its commitment to ensuring seamless connectivity across transit modes.  
  2. There is a focus on creating clean and green buses, where the State Transport Corporations will be converting 700 diesel buses to CNG buses at Rs.70 crore and 1125 e-buses will be deployed across Chennai (950), Coimbatore (75), and Madurai (100) for public use starting in 2025-26.  
  3. The Mini-bus scheme is being expanded with revised rules and regulations in around 2,000 routes. 

Why we are glad!
With 28.2% of Chennai’s citizens relying on buses, metro, and rail— covering first- and last-mile distances on foot—the investment in two multimodal hubs is a timely and welcome move. These hubs will expand public transport coverage, improve accessibility, reduce travel distances, and times. They will also ensure seamless transfers, integrate information across modes, and provide standardised wayfinding facilities.

Tamil Nadu converting 700 diesel buses to CNG, is a good move as compared to diesel, CNG reduces particulate emissions by up to 70%, improving public health in areas where air quality often exceeds safe limits. Additionally, it aligns with the state’s climate goals, cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 20-25% per bus. This initiative lays the groundwork for scaling up cleaner public transport.

Electric buses further support sustainability efforts. The addition of 1,125 electric buses will save diesel fuel costs and cut down carbon emissions.

However, Tamil Nadu still faces a significant shortfall. Based on MoHUA’s benchmark of 60 buses per lakh population, the state’s eight major cities require 12,900 more buses. Despite this gap, Tamil Nadu is leading the way in electric bus adoption, demonstrating how strategic infrastructure planning can support sustainable transit.

The Mini-bus scheme expansion addresses last-mile connectivity issues in suburban and rural areas, where residents often depend on private vehicles or informal transport. By extending the scheme to 2,000 routes with updated regulations, Tamil Nadu aims to improve service quality and coverage. These regulatory changes are expected to resolve operational challenges, enhancing feeder bus services and creating a more efficient system.

2. Providing Assistance to Transport Undertakings – Rs9,682 crore

The Tamil Nadu State Transport corporations are allocated budget for various kinds of subsidies and funds this year. 

  1. Rs.3,600 crore for Magalir Vidiyal Payanam, for free bus rides for women. 
  2. Rs.1,782 crore for free student bus pass scheme. 
  3. Rs.1,157 crore for diesel subsidy. 
  4. Rs.2,000 crore performance-based incentive fund will also be provided to Transport Corporations in Tami Nadu. 
  5. Over and above these subsidies, Rs.646 crore has also been allocated for MTC Chennai as a viability gap fund. 

Why we are glad 
This comprehensive allocation addresses multiple challenges facing Tamil Nadu’s public transport system. The free bus passes for women have already shown remarkable success, with women ridership increasing from 40% to 61% since implementation. The economic impact is substantial, with women saving roughly Rs800 monthly through this scheme. The diesel subsidy component helps mitigate fuel price volatility, ensuring transport corporations can maintain service levels. 
Viability Gap Funding is crucial for developing new infrastructure projects that might otherwise lack financial sustainability. This holistic approach to transport financing , sets a national precedent for how states can support public transportation through multiple financial mechanisms while addressing social equity and operational sustainability. 

Pic: Students await their bus in Chennai

3.Pushing for Electrification – Rs.4 crores

The TN state budget also includes allocation to nudge the adoption of EV by the private sector. 

  1. The Tamil Nadu Platform-Based Gig Workers Welfare Board has been established to promote the welfare of workers. A new scheme has been initiated to support the livelihood of workers registered with the welfare board by providing a subsidy of Rs.20,000 each to 2,000 internet-based service workers for purchasing a new electric vehicle (e-scooter). 
  2. Roadside facilities at 10 selected locations on state highways, including power supply facilities for Electric Vehicles, food stalls, accommodation, rest rooms, first-aid and basic medical facilities, along with shopping malls have been proposed.   

Why we are glad:
Tamil Nadu government supports the growing gig economy by addressing transportation challenges for platform-based workers. High upfront costs have been a barrier to e-scooter adoption, but this subsidy shortens the payback period, making EVs more viable. Research indicates that a 1% increase in purchase subsidies can boost EV sales by 1.36%. While this allocation covers 2,000 workers, it lays the groundwork for scaling incentives, reducing the carbon footprint of last-mile deliveries and personal transport.
Additionally, new roadside facilities fill critical infrastructure gaps for long-distance travelers and commercial drivers. By integrating EV charging stations, Tamil Nadu is tackling range anxiety, a key barrier to EV adoption. This initiative aligns with the state’s EV goals, combining amenities with economic opportunities to create a sustainable highway service model. As Tamil Nadu expands its EV network, these facilities set a precedent for boosting electric mobility while enhancing highway infrastructure.

4. Allocating for Climate Resilient and Healthier Public Spaces – Rs.582 crores

The Tamil Nadu government has shown commitment to invest on climate resilient spaces by announcing multiple projects. These include: 

  1. Creation of Climate Resilient Sponge Parks in seven places in Chennai Metropolitan area with allocation of Rs.88 crore. 
  2. A Riverside Development Works project which includes creation of sewage treatment plants, footpaths, streetlights etc. has been announced for Trichy, Madurai, Erode, Coimbatore, and Tirunelveli Corporations. An allocation of Rs.400 crore has been made for the same.  
  3. Blue Flag Certification for six beaches has been announced with allocation of Rs.24 crore. 
  4. Eco Park to be created in the heart Udhagamandalam in Nilgiris district. It will cover an extent of 52 acres and will be established in the Racecourse area. Allocation of Rs.70 crore has been made for the project. 

        Why we are glad: 
        Tamil Nadu’s continued focus on flood resilience, climate adaptation, and public health is a step in the right direction! Investments like these also create opportunities to transform public spaces, boost local economies, and create safer, healthier, and more vibrant neighborhoods. When designed well, these spaces can encourage walking, cycling, and community engagement, making cities more livable and sustainable. 
        Additionally, integrating walking and cycling infrastructure, universal street design, and traffic calming measures as a standard in road improvement projects as per our earlier recommendation, will ensure equitable accessibility for such public spaces, promote modal shift to sustainable transport and help minimise carbon emissions. 

        5. Investing more in Urban Highways – Rs.4193 crore

        The TN State Budget continues to support the expansion of its highway network and industrial corridors. Notably among them are,  

        1. The Tamil Nadu State Highways Authority (TANSHA) has been allocated Rs.2,100 crore for a 14.2 km long four-lane elevated road from Thiruvanmiyur to Uthandi along the East Coast Road.  
        2. Rs.380 crore have been allocated for flyovers in Chennai under the Kalaignar Nagarpura Membattu Thittam. 
        3. Rs.1713 crore of allocation for the construction of 14 bypasses across cities in Tamil Nadu including Coimbatore and Tirunelveli. 

        What we recommend: 
        Data shows that widening of roads does not reduce traffic congestion, rather increases it. Wide roads attract more vehicles and high speeds-the biggest reason for road crash deaths in Tamil Nadu. Beyond road engineering solutions, this is an opportunity to prioritise road equity by ensuring a balanced Right of Way for all users—pedestrians, cyclists, and public transport commuters alike.  
        The funding should therefore support the implementation of traffic calming elements in these corridors with well-designed footpaths and cycle lanes, safer crossings with refuge islands and other facilities for universal access. This is necessary to ensure that the urban highways, flyovers and bypasses are safe and comfortable for everyone to use. 
        As the State continues to expand its road infrastructure, the focus should shift from merely adding more lanes for private vehicles to building an efficient and reliable public transport system. Dedicated bus lanes have been proven to significantly cut travel times by 20-30% during peak hours, ensuring that buses can move efficiently even in high-traffic corridors. This not only makes public transport more attractive, also boosts ridership and revenue. A great example is Bengaluru’s NIMBUS project, where the introduction of dedicated bus lanes led to a 64% increase in ticketing revenue—a clear indicator of how prioritising buses can transform urban mobility.  

        6. Making Investments for Road Infrastructure Upgrades – Rs.13,952 crore

        In 2025-26 budget as well, TN government continued to invest in multiple road development and road expansion projects. Notably among them were:

        1. Under the Kalaignar Nagarpura Membattu Thittam scheme a total outlay of Rs2000 crore was seen for various development work. Of this, road works worth Rs.816 crore have been allocated for infrastructure upgrades. These will be taken up across Chennai, Coimbatore and Madurai. 
        2. Road upgradation work got a focus, additionally, under the Nagarpura Salai Membattu Thittam, at a cost of Rs.550 crore.
        3. The budget also provides a substantial allocation of Rs.9,476 crore under the Comprehensive Road Infrastructure Development Programme to improve roads and bridges, state-wide.
        4. The city of Chennai is set to receive another allocation of Rs.2,910 crore towards the development of the Peripheral Ring Road Project, a stretch of 132.87km connecting Ennore Port in the north to Poonjeri in the south.
        5. The budget also provides allocations to the tune of Rs.200 crore for Urban Highways, to implement suitable improvements in high-risk and accident-prone areas, including narrow curves and road junctions.

        What we recommend: 
        Continued investment in road infrastructure upgrades is a positive step towards improving urban mobility.  
        To make our streets truly inclusive and efficient, it is essential that the government invests not just in carriageway improvements, but beyond. As mentioned above, integrating walking and cycling infrastructure and following universal design practices should be non-negotiable in all road development work initiated by the state. 
        Including features such as raised crossings, refuge islands, and designated parking can help ensure safer access for all users. We recommend that these critical design elements are integrated into all new road projects. 

        Other Highlights

         

        It is worth mentioning that there are recurring investments in key areas of urban mobility as well as creation of new projects to enhance urban sustainability and safety:. 

        1. Chennai Metro Rail Project – Phase II gets continued allocation of Rs.4,807 crore.
        2.  Singara Chennai 2.0 – Continued allocation for urban development projects for Chennai city under this scheme with an outlay of Rs.850 crore.
        3. Global City in Chennai- A new city will be developed near Chennai spread over an extent of 2,000 acres. TIDCO will soon commence the works for the first phase of the ‘Global City’ project, which will offer world-class facilities.
        4. Safety for Women- The budget has shown a continued commitment towards women safety with this year’s budget earmarking Rs.75 crore for the same in Chennai and four other cities across Tamil Nadu.

        By Varsha Vasuhe (Associate Urban Development), Sanchana Sathyanarayan (Associate Healthy Street)
        With Inputs from Sooraj EM, Deputy Manager & Venugopal AV, Programme Manager

        Edited by Donita Jose and Aangi Shah (Communications)

        Are Indian Cities Budgeting Enough for Sustainable Transport? The Tale of Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad

        by

        (Part 2 of Municipal Budget Analysis Series)

        As cities across India gear up to draft their 2025-26 municipal budgets, the question looms: How well are they prioritising sustainable transport this time around? A good way to determine this is by analysing the municipal budget documents published yearly. This is an important exercise, after all, budgets don’t just outline the finances of the city but also reflect their vision. 

        In this context, we delve into the findings from a municipal budget analysis of Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) and Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC). While our previous blog focused on PCMC, this one also highlights Pune, posing a key question: How do these twin conjoined cities which share mobility services like the metro, Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd (PMPML) bus system, and interconnect streets, allocate municipal budget to sustainable transport initiatives? 

        Budgetary Overview of Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad: Neighbouring Cities with Divergent Approaches 

        To understand how Pune and PCMC prioritise sustainable transport, it is essential to consider their population, size, and 2024-25 budget allocations. 

        Pune, a tier-1 city with 44 lakh Population (Projected for 2024) and 518 sq. km of area, contrasts with Pimpri Chinchwad, a tier-2 city with a population of 25 lakh (Projected for 2024) and one-third the size of Pune. The table below highlights their budget allocations. 

        Key Highlights from Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad’s Budgets (2024-25) 

        The team meticulously examined the city’s annual budgets for the past three years, scrutinising each line item related to transport and categorising them into ‘sustainable and non-sustainable modes’ of transport. Sustainable modes include projects that encourage walk, cycle, and use of public transport. Non-sustainable modes include items which encourage use of private motor vehicles and prioritise private vehicle movement over other sustainable modes. 

        IndicesPunePimpri Chinchwad
        Total Budget₹11,601 crore ₹8,676 crore 
        Total Transport budget allocation₹2,320 crores (20% of total budget) ₹1,475 crore (17% of total budget) 
        Total Sustainable transport budget:  ₹918 crores (~40% of the transport allocations)  ₹818 crores (~55% of the transport allocations) 
        Allocations for non-motorised transport ₹351 crores (15% of the transport allocations) ₹459 crores (31% of the transport allocations) 
        Allocations for Public transport (Buses and infra) ₹567 crore (24% of the transport allocations) ₹359 crore (24% of the transport allocations) 
        2024-25 Budget Highlights

        What were the key observations?

        The analysis of budgetary allocations reveals contrasting approaches toward urban transport priorities, offering valuable lessons for other cities. 

        1. Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad’s allocation for sustainable transport see slight differences  

        In 2024-25, PMC and PCMC allocated significant portions of their municipal budgets to transport—₹2,320 crore (20% of total budget) for PMC and ₹1,475 crore (17% of total budget) for PCMC.  

        Over the past three years, both cities have consistently spent about 16%-20% of their total budgets on transport initiatives. 

        While Pune’s transport budget grew by 40% compared to last year and Pimpri Chinchwad’s by 31%, how they allocated these budgets tells a different story. 

        Chart showing the annual trend of the percentage of transport budget allocated under the total municipal budget.

        While PMC allocated a higher absolute amount for sustainable transport (₹918 crore vs. ₹818 crore for PCMC), a closer look at the percentage reflects a different reality. Sustainable transport makes up only 40% of Pune’s transport budget, whereas Pimpri Chinchwad allocated 55.5% of its transport budget to sustainable initiatives. 

        Chart showing the annual trend of the percentage of transport budget allocated to ‘sustainable mobility’ initiatives by Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad

        2. The curious case of missing allocations for cycle tracks in Pune 

        The budgets for Non-Motorised Transport (NMT) infrastructure, which includes building footpaths and cycle tracks, were a mixed bag for Pune in 2024.  

        The city allocated ₹351 crore for NMT (15% of its overall transport budget). However, what is concerning is that there is no dedicated fund allocated for cycle tracks.  


        This is surprising, given that since 2018, Pune has had a dedicated budgetary allocation for building cycle tracks in alignment with the Pune Bicycle Plan (2017), which set an ambitious goal of increasing cycling’s modal share from 3% in 2017 to 25% by 2031. At one stage, PMC allocated ₹75 crore in 2018-19 to gradually declining it to ₹3.3 crore 2023-24. However, this year, there was no dedicated fund towards this. Pune has projects like ‘Pune Streets Program (PSP) which gets dedicated funding every year through which city can develop footpaths and cycle tracks.  

        Glimpses of Pune’s vibrant cycling culture. With no sustained and dedicated investment, this community is at risk

        In comparison, Pune’s transport budget in 2024 saw a sizeable amount to build more flyovers! ₹93.5 crore is allocated for grade separators, including flyovers, in Pune budget. This marks a concerning trend as flyover are known to only offer temporary relief from congestion. 

        On the other hand, Pimpri Chinchwad has adopted a more balanced approach, allocating 31% of its overall transport budget for NMT. They allocated ₹459.4 crore in 2024-25 for NMT. This accounts for 31.1% of Pimpri Chinchwad’s overall transport budget—double Pune’s share for NMT.  

        PCMC has projects like the ‘Urban Streetscapes’ and the ‘Harit Setu’ program which gets dedicated funding every year through which city develops footpaths and cycle tracks. 

        In terms of funds for flyover, PCMC has dedicated ₹27.7 crore to flyovers in 2024-25 budgets, which as mentioned above only offers temporary relief from congestion. 

        3. Both cities commit VGF for PMPML, but not so committed to allocating for new buses 

        In the 2024-25 municipal budget, Pune allocated ₹567 crore, (24% of the transport allocations) towards PMPML bus services while Pimpri Chinchwad allocated ₹358.6 crore (24.3% of transport allocations).  This is the overall allocations for public transport; however, a closer look shows that the majority of this went towards Viability Gap Funding (VGF). 

        VGF is a specific component given by both cities to PMPML to operate buses and cover PMPML’s operational costs. As agreed by the cities, this VGF is distributed in specific proportions, with PMC covering 60% of the amount sought by PMPML, and PCMC contributing the remaining 40%. 

        PMPMPL needs funds beyond VGF to procure new buses

        In this context, Pune allocated ₹536.43 crore of the ₹567 crore in 2024-25 as VGF for PMPML. Pimpri Chinchwad provided ₹290.4 crore out of the ₹358.6 crore in 2024-25 as VGF for PMPML. These budget allocations are to keep the service afloat for day-to-day operations.  

        However, the budget allocation for new buses and improvement of the Rainbow Bus Rapid Transport (BRT) infrastructure, while critical, is negligible.   

        PMC set aside just ₹58 lakh while PCMC allocated ₹4.27 crore towards the BRT service improvement and infrastructure.  

        4. Both cities dip into central funds  

        Beyond municipal budgets, central and state schemes significantly shape urban mobility. 

        Both cities maintain separate lists for central and state funds, such as NCAP, AMRUT, and JNNURM. Pune allocated ₹103 crore under NCAP for sustainable mobility, including ₹38 crore for NMT-friendly streets. Pimpri Chinchwad on the other hand, allocated ₹77 crore under NCAP for sustainable mobility, with ₹23 crore for NMT-friendly streets. 

        Under the 15th finance commission, both the cities have tapped into national funds. Through these funds, Pune allocated ₹25 crore for last-mile metro connectivity, ₹30 crore for e-bus procurement, and ₹10 crore for six e-bus depots. Pimpri Chinchwad, allocated ₹42 crore for last-mile metro connectivity and ₹12 crore for EV charging stations.  

        PCMC took a more integrated budgeting approach for transport related projects, allocating ₹262.5 crore through the Urban Transport Fund (UTF). Of this, 48% was dedicated for NMT and public transport, with the rest for carriageway, and bridges etc. 

        With its newly formed Urban Mobility Department, PCMC plans to increase UTF allocations for sustainable transport in 2025-26, reflecting a stronger on sustainable mobility and integration. PMC has had no such dedicated UTF budgets. 

         In a Nutshell

        Overall, it is evident that Pune, despite a larger allocation for transport than in the previous years in terms of absolute numbers, was not successful in improving their percentage share for sustainable transport.  

        PCMC is steadily increasing its investment in sustainable transport, a positive trend that must continue to meet its NMT and public transport goals. Meanwhile, Pune must significantly boost its allocations to reverse its declining trajectory and stay on track with its mobility vision. 

        Six key lessons for other cities when developing ‘Annual Municipal Transport Budget’ documents and strategies 

        The analysis of Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad’s transport budgets reveals critical best practices that other cities can adopt to create effective, transparent, and sustainable urban mobility strategies. Here are six actionable takeaways: 

        1. Uniform format and transparency:  Municipal budgets should follow a consistent, detailed format to track trends and enable comparative analysis. Both Pune and PCMC use uniform budget templates annually, making it easier to track allocations. They also stand out as cities that publish budget documents online each year in local/regional languages. 
        2. Follow a detailed template consistently: Cities should use detailed templates for project-wise budget allocations instead of lump sums. This improves transparency by listing total project costs, yearly allocations, and expenditures, ensuring accountability. Both Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad follow project-based budgeting. Pune traditionally allocates funds under initiatives like road safety, pedestrian policy, and bicycle tracks, while Pimpri Chinchwad focuses on programmes like Harit Setu, Urban Streetscapes, and the Parking Policy.  
        3. Align transport budgets with city goals: Municipal budgets allocations should reflect/align with the transport goals identified in the city’s plans and policies. Regular sustainable transport budget analysis help identify shortcomings, while providing opportunities for course corrections. 
        4. Ensure a diverse revenue streams: Cities should diversify revenue sources, including land value capture, revenue from parking management, international sources, and even municipal bonds, if possible, to reduce reliance on state or central allocations. This ensures consistent funding for transport projects boosting the municipal allocations. Both cities are looking at Municipal bonds for funding mobility projects. PCMC has also participated in national and international competitions for fetching additional funding.  
        5. Create dedicated budget heads for priority projects: Cities should establish dedicated budget heads for priority sustainable transport projects, like implementing footpaths, junction improvement, bus augmentation, bus infra upgradation, etc. Part of the allocation should be for implementation of policies and plans, research, capacity development of staff, road safety initiatives, etc. Each project should have a clear line item in the budget. This approach ensures targeted and continuous funding and ensures accountability. 

        The budget analysis of Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad tells a clear story that while these twin cities share mobility networks, their financial commitments to sustainable transport differ significantly. This will eventually reflect in the way they set out to achieve their sustainable transport goals. 
         
        As cities across India prepare their 2025-26 municipal budgets, ensuring a consistent and transparent approach to transport funding will be key to creating accessible, efficient, and sustainable urban mobility. After all, where cities put their money today will shape how people move tomorrow. 

        Written by Pranjal Kulkarni, Programme Manager- Healthy Streets and Compact Cities, Rutuja Nivate, Associate, Urban Development, and Siddhartha Godbole, Senior Associate- Urban Development

        Edited by Donita Jose, Senior Associate Communications

        Low Emission Zones: Breathing Life into Chennai’s Future

        by

        As appeared in the The New Indian Express

        Chennai – from the bustling markets of T Nagar to the IT parks in OMR, is a city constantly on the move. But with every step forward, we seem to drag the weight of traffic and pollution along with us. Every day, hundreds of thousands of vehicles clog its arteries, choking the city with pollution, noise and traffic. Chennai’s roads see an addition of nearly 1.5 lakh vehicles every year. The result? Some days, the air we breathe in Chennai feels like smoking almost nine cigarettes every day. But what if we could create spaces where the air feels lighter, the roads free of traffic, and the sky a little clearer? One piece to this puzzle might lie in the concept that cities around the world, including some in India, are experimenting with – Low Emission Zones (LEZ), also often known as Clean Air Zones.
        These zones typically limit highly polluting vehicles by either charging non-compliant ones or restricting the worst polluters, with penalties for violators. International cities like London, Milan, Seoul, Paris, Lima, and Beijing, have already embraced LEZs and Indian cities are not far behind

        India’s LEZ Experiment: Hope on the Horizon

        India is already exploring strategies to reduce urban pollution. Delhi’s Environment Compensation Charge (ECC) on commercial vehicles, Agra’s Zero Emission Zones (ZEZs) around the Taj Mahal, and Kevadiya’s restrictions on non-electric vehicles demonstrate proactive steps. Matheran banned all motor vehicles
        to protect its ecosystem, while pedestrian zones (not classified as LEZs) in Delhi’s Chandni Chowk and Bengaluru’s Church Street show air quality improvements. Further, cities like Pune, Pimpri Chinchwad, and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar are trialling LEZs, prioritising area-wide interventions.

        Why LEZs matter for Chennai

        Staggering numbers on the Air Quality Index from cities like Delhi often overshadow narratives and make headlines, creating an impression that cities like Chennai do not have pressing air quality concerns. According to the Urban Emissions Report 2021, Chennai ranked among the top 10 cities in India with the worst air quality. Our everyday commute, especially through heavy traffic hotspots like T Nagar, Anna Salai, Kathipara junction, or Poonamallee High Road is not just stressful—it’s hazardous to our health, with exposure to dangerous levels of particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Imagine the impact a LEZ could have in this situation. London’s ULEZ, launched in 2019, reduced nitrogen dioxide by 44% and traffic by 30%, with a 21% increase in cycling. Barcelona’s LEZ cut traffic by 30%, NO2 levels by 24%, and increased cycling by 15%. Santiago’s LEZ reduced central traffic by 20%, with particulate matter and NO2 levels dropping by 40% in some areas. What if Chennai could experience a similar transformation?

        Encouragingly, Tamil Nadu’s State Planning Commission, in collaboration with the British Deputy High Commission, Chennai, recently came out with a report on Low Emission Zoning – A Toolkit for Chennai. It integrates best practices from the UK with a customised roadmap for Chennai, balancing community engagement with the city’s unique priorities and the complexities of rapid urbanisation.

        This report further states that LEZs in Chennai could cut NO2 and PM2.5 levels by over 20%, significantly improving public health. LEZs go beyond cleaner air—they improve street efficiency by cutting congestion, especially during peak hours, making commutes more reliable and fast. Fewer vehicles also mean fewer accidents, a problem that Chennai’s packed roads know all too well. They also offer cities a chance to step-up and enhance streets for walking and cycling.

        For LEZs to truly succeed, the city will also need reliable and improved public transport services. Collaborations with the Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd (MTC) and the Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) are crucial to ensure that these zones are supported with high-quality and high-frequency services to encourage people to choose sustainable and affordable alternatives while reducing resistance to these zones. By using enforcement mechanisms, whether through priced or non-priced LEZs, implementing these zones in Chennai would support the state-wide goals to boost the adoption of electric vehicles as outlined in its EV Policy. The change doesn’t have to happen overnight, but with the right policies and action, it could be gradually phased in.

        A Roadmap for Chennai  

        Turning this vision into reality requires a clear roadmap.

        1. Designing the Zones with Data:  

        LEZs must be backed by data-driven insights. Use vehicle emission surveys across the city, air quality sensors and real-time traffic data to identify the most polluted and congested zones to deliver visible improvements. Clear policies and regulations: State and city level administrators should leverage the recent Low Emission Zoning Toolkit, to create clear policies that enable enforceable measures and plans.

        2. Engaging People:

        Involving communities and creating champions amongst health care professionals and local community leaders and others to support the cause is important.

        3. Political Will

        In addition to frameworks and policies, LEZs need elected officials to champion implementation. They must align stakeholders and ensure these ideas are prioritised in budgets and planning.

        4. Phased Rollout

        Begin by implementing Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) around areas like hospitals and schools.
        As the improvements register in public consciousness, gradually, these zones can be expanded over a period of time, while encouraging the use of non-motorised mobility and making public transport more efficient

        5. Measure Impact for Scale- Up

        Track key metrics like air quality improvements, traffic reduction, and public transport adoption to evaluate success and expand programme.

        LEZs offer a powerful, practical way to clear the air—figuratively and literally.
        Let’s give Chennai the fresh breath it deserves.

        Written by

        Aswathy Dilip, Managing Director ITDP India, South Asia Director, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy

        Sanjiv Gopal, Chief Strategy Officer, Asar

        Union Budget 2025: Encouraging Push for Public Transport and E-Mobility, But Is It Enough? 

        by

        The latest Union Budget 2025-26 announcement by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on February 01, 2025 has shown continued support for public transport and e-mobility. This reflects the government’s commitment to sustainability.  

        Here are the highlights in terms of allocations to promote more buses and electric mobility: 

        Key Budget Allocations

        1. PM e-Bus Sewa Scheme: This scheme received Rs 1,310 crore (up from Rs 500 crore in 2024). This scheme aims to improve urban bus transport in India by providing nearly 10,000 urban buses to cities.  
        2. PM e-Drive Scheme: This new flagship scheme received an increased allocation from Rs 1,870 crore in 2024 to Rs 4,000 crore this year. This is a two-fold increase! The scheme will support in procuring 14,000 new e-buses, 1,10,000 e-rickshaws, e-trucks, and e-ambulances.  
        3. Production Linked Incentive (PLI) for Battery Storage: Under the overall push for PLI scheme, the National Programme on Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) Battery Storage, received a small share with an allocation of Rs 155.76 crore. This helps reduce battery costs and promote EVs but could have been higher. 

        However, when we compare these allocations to actual needs, the gap remains significant. 

        A Huge Gap in Urban Buses

        India needs 2,00,000 urban buses, but only 35,000 are operational (inclusive of e-buses). To bridge this, the union government scheme provides just 24,000 buses (10,000 from PM e-Bus Sewa and 14,000 from PM e-Drive throughout the duration of the entire scheme over multiple years). This is far below than what is required.  

        Pic: A crowded bus in Bhubaneshwar. Owing to no major investments in public transport over the years, the passenger experience has been deteriorating

        Metro Rail Funding vs Bus Funding

        In the 2025 budget, one standout was how the metro rail funding increased significantly from Rs 24,000 crore to Rs 31,000 crore, with Rs 649 crore in grants. We at ITDP India wish a similar allocation was done for PM e-Bus Sewa to make a big impact on bus services in alignment with the actual need for buses.  

        The budget supports public transport and e-mobility, but to truly transform urban mobility, more investment and better execution of schemes are needed. Over and above this, sustainable mobility also requires investment in walking and cycling infrastructure as well and we hope this happens soon! 

        By Vaishali Singh, Programme Manager, ITDP India

        With inputs from Parin Visariya, Venugopal AV, Donita Jose

        10 Impactful Solutions to Improve India’s Air Quality

        by

        Air pollution in India has reached a tipping point, threatening the health and well-being of millions. Amid this growing crisis, one promising solution is the implementation of Low Emission Zones (LEZs)—designated areas where polluting vehicles are restricted to curb emissions and improve air quality. To help cities across India tackle this issue, ITDP India recently launched Low Emission Zone Basics, a comprehensive guide for creating cleaner, healthier urban environments. 

        At the launch, experts from global organisations shared crucial insights on how LEZs can play a pivotal role in addressing air pollution, while also offering policy recommendations to guide India’s path to cleaner air. From improving data collection to enhancing public transport and promoting localised climate action, these strategies provide a roadmap for urgent and effective change. Read on for key takeaways from the experts who are shaping the future of India’s air quality. 

        The experts include, Shashi Verma, Chief Technology Officer, Transport for London (TfL); Dr. Anju Goel, Associate Director at The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI); Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India; Dr. Sandra Wappelhorst, Senior Researcher at The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), Berlin;  Sree Kumar Kumaraswamy, Program Director at World Resources Institute (WRI); and Dr. Vivek Vaidyanathan, Program Manager at Artha Global. 

        1. Better research on sources of air pollution

        Central government must invest in better collection and dissemination of data and research on the sources of pollution. To date, the public debate around pollution in India is clouded in fog with some suggesting it is because of Diwali and some suggesting is because of crop burning, which is fundamentally not true. Air pollution in Gangetic plains is far more complex and getting better evidence is something central government can work on – Shashi Verma, Chief Technology Officer, Transport for London (TfL)    

        2. Need for multiple interventions

        London’s air quality success stems from a series of cumulative interventions since the 1950s, starting with banning coal burning, introducing clean diesel programmes, and expanding LEZs. A major contributor to improvement was increasing the mode share of sustainable transport, which reduced overall vehicle numbers. The broader lesson is to have a comprehensive approach in addressing multiple sources of pollution. – Shashi Verma, Chief Technology Officer, Transport for London (TfL) 

        3. State government must approve LEZs 

        Pimpri Chinchwad, in Maharashtra has decided to implement an Environmental Protection Charge ranging from ₹100-750, for polluting vehicles entering the LEZs. But the enforcement of this requires collaboration with the Road Transport Officials (RTOs) and traffic departments. Currently, there is no provision within the transport department to address such violations, making the need for an enforcement mechanism essential. State-level approvals and notifications are also necessary to formally designate the area as a LEZ. State governments must play a supportive role by bringing all stakeholders together to develop a clear, actionable plan. – Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India 

        4. Improve public transport

        Public transport connectivity in most cities remains inadequate and requires significant upgrades. State support is crucial to ensure there is an increase in the number of buses and improvement in the overall network. – Parin Visariya, Deputy Manager at ITDP India

        5. Package LEZs for health

        One way to get faster acceptance of concepts like LEZs is to make the stakeholders focus on how it will improve health. Talking about its benefits in sensitive areas in terms of schools, places of worship, hospitals, works well in convincing city authorities to take this up. – Dr. Vivek Vaidyanathan, Program Manager at Artha Global 

        6. Focus on funding clean air in rural areas

        Currently the National Clean Air Programme funds go only to urban local bodies, where the concerns are more about road dust, vehicular emissions etc. But when it comes to rural areas, these funds are not applicable. Here the sources of pollution are also different like biomass burning. This is when state governments need to pitch in. Having only NCAP as a funding source won’t solve the problem. We need various other state level schemes.  – Dr. Anju Goel, Associate Director at The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) 

        7. Budget for climate at municipality levels

        Cities must explore ways to tap into their existing municipal budget to start climate works. If all departments commit some amount to climate, it can be a starting point with no need to look outside for funds. For instance, in most municipalities, the roads budget is the highest- so it can be leveraged to implement action to create clean air. – Sree Kumar Kumaraswamy, Program Director at World Resources Institute (WRI) 

        8. Develop state-level schemes

        States must come up with innovative mechanisms like the Majhi Vasundhara initiative in Maharashtra where the state has decentralised climate action. Now be it a village or a city, through their own means, they can take up small ticket projects that work towards climate action. This kind of model of sourcing innovation from the ground up is an excellent example and state can play a facilitating role to enable thinking innovatively. – Sree Kumar Kumaraswamy, Program Director at World Resources Institute (WRI) 

        9. Focus on creating a good narrative

        Create a phased and gradual LEZ plan with clear timelines to allow citizens and businesses to have time to adapt. Offer financial assistance to low-income groups and small businesses to transition to compliant vehicles. Develop mobility programs like air bonuses to encourage alternatives to car ownership. Speak to all stakeholders and communicate the programme. – Dr. Sandra Wappelhorst, Senior Researcher at The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), Berlin 

        10. Start with CPCBs and non-attainment cities

        When working with state governments, the Central Pollution Control Board is a good entry point, wherein they can enact some of the state-wide regulations and laws that’s applicable to all non-attainment cities. – Dr. Vivek Vaidyanathan, Program Manager at Artha Global

        Low Emission Zone Basics

        Written by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communications and Development, ITDP India

        Are Indian Cities Budgeting Enough for Sustainable Transport? A Case from Pimpri Chinchwad

        by

        (Part 1 of Municipal Budget Analysis Series)

        Annual municipal budgets shape how the city’s resources- the taxpayers’ money- are allocated to shape the city and in turn serve its residents. However, the question arises: do the city’s annual budgets reflect investments in mobility for cleaner air and congestion-free streets, which have been challenging for most cities? Such budget allocations are even more critical for rapidly urbanising Indian cities. 

        Pimpri Chinchwad is one of India’s fastest-growing tier-2 cities. Through its ambitious policies, plans, and projects, Pimpri Chinchwad has been actively striving to build a robust sustainable urban mobility system in the city.  Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation’s (PCMC) bold policies, including the Non-Motorised Transport Policy (2021) and Pune Metropolitan Region’s Comprehensive Mobility Plan (2018), aim for 90% of trips to be made by walking, cycling, or public transport by 2036. PCMC also aims to reduce private vehicle trips by 18%, focusing on a fair distribution of road space between all users and a shift towards sustainable urban transport modes such as walking, cycling, and public transport. However, as per Parivahan data, with nearly 90 vehicles per 100 residents, congestion, road safety, and air quality remain major challenges.  

        PCMC is well aware of this alarming figure and is making every effort to address it. With the further expansions of the existing 54 km of Bus Rapid Transit and the 7 km of Metro, along with 16 km of suburban rail, and more than 100+ km of redesigned healthy streets, the city is reshaping how people move.  

        While in the last decade, the city has made strides with its sustainable transport initiatives, how can we ensure it remains committed to creating safer streets, reducing congestion and improving air quality? 

        One key indicator of the city’s commitment to its sustainable transport goals is how much allocation of the municipal funds goes to various transport modes, especially the sustainable ones – walking, cycling, and public transport.  

        PCMC collaborated with ITDP India to analyse the city’s annual budget allocations from 2022-23 to 2024-25 (across a period of three years) focusing on mobility projects in the city. In June 2024, ITDP launched the ‘PCMC Municipal Budget Analysis Report’ capturing the insights from this research project. 

        Why was the study conducted?

        The study was conducted to gain a nuanced understanding of historical budget allocation trends, assess current allocation patterns, and identify gaps and opportunities for future provisions towards urban mobility. It aimed to establish a detailed report of funding requirements through projections and provide informed recommendations to enhance the upcoming annual mobility budget allocations. Additionally, this study was undertaken in response to the lack of such detailed case studies in India, highlighting the need for more structured approaches to urban mobility budgeting and planning. 

        How did we do it?

        The team meticulously examined the city’s annual budgets for the past three years, scrutinising each line item related to transport and categorising them into ‘sustainable and non-sustainable modes’ of transport. Sustainable modes include projects that encourage walk, cycle, and use of public transport. Non-sustainable modes include items which encourage use of private motor vehicles and prioritise private vehicle movement over other sustainable modes. 

        What were the key observations?

        1. Transport allocations inching towards its sustainable transport goals 

        With a total municipal budget of ₹8,676 crore, PCMC has one of the highest per capita budgets allocated in the state. In 2024-25, 17% (₹1475.4 crore) of the annual budget was allocated to transport– an increase in proportion to the overall increase in municipal budget as compared to the previous year. Additionally, over half of the current transport budget is now allocated to sustainable transport infrastructure, up from 48% (₹540 crore) to 56% (₹818 crore) as compared to the previous year. 

        Graph showing an upward trend in PCMC’s annual transport allocations, along with the sustainable and non-sustainable allocation split 

        2. Significant increase in allocation towards walking-cycling infrastructure 

        The non-motorised transport (NMT) budget allocation of ₹439.7 crore accounts for more than half of the sustainable transport budget and one-third of the entire transport budget! As compared to the previous years, the city has more than doubled its allocation towards NMT from ₹217.9 crore in 2023-24 to ₹439.7 crore in 2024-25 which is a move in right direction. This shift is mainly due to the allocations for the ambitious ‘Harit Setu’ project that aims to make PCMC a 15-minute walking-cycling neighbourhood city and ‘Urban Streetscapes Programme’ (USP). In addition, this also includes allocations for initiatives like cycle sharing systems, parking management, and maintenance of infrastructure. 

        Sankey graph showing the detailed transport allocations for the year 2024-25

        However, PCMC needs to allocate a similar amount consistently every year towards creation of footpaths and cycle tracks to achieve the goal of 90% of all trips by sustainable modes by 2036. This budget will support the transformation of 25 km of major streets and 100 km of minor streets each year. Only by maintaining this aggressive pace, can PCMC systematically transform its streets over time and move closer to achieving the NMT Policy’s targets. 

        3. Need for more investment in public transport 

        While there have been significant efforts to improve walking and cycling, there is a gap in funding for more public buses. There is still a need to make buses more accessible to everyone. The city funds its public bus system by providing Viability Gap Funding (VGF) to the city’s transport undertaking – Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd (PMPML). However, the city’s budget allocation for buses has seen a slower increase, rising from ₹231 crore in 2022-23 to ₹359 crore in 2024-25 for buses over the four years. According to PMPML’s Vision 2027, the city currently has around 26 buses per lakh population, which is half of the national guideline of 60 buses per lakh population and an exponential increase is needed to meet these goals. In addition to the operational expenditures, PCMC needs to allocate an estimated ₹730 crore annually to achieve target bus fleet of 2850 size (as per the recommended MoHUA standards) by 2030. 

        Comparative chart showing the non-sustainable and public transport allocation trends 

        4. Car-centric investments still dominate the budget 

        As one of the fastest-growing cities, Pimpri Chinchwad has also prioritised the development of new streets to ensure connections to the new villages. As a result, the private motor-vehicle-centric road expenditure is reasonably high. It is critical for such cities to ensure this new development is equitable and caters to the needs of pedestrians, cyclists, and public transport. The allocation of budget for car-centric infrastructure, such as flyovers and multi-level car parks, is consistently high. At ₹657 crore, PCMC is allocating twice as much for non-sustainable transport than that for public transport. Surprisingly, some programs, like Sustainable Urban Transport Projects (SUTP) and Urban Transport Funds (UTF), earmarked for sustainable development have budgetary provisions for car-centric projects. A 100% of the ₹4.5 crore under SUTP and 51.6% of the ₹262.5 crore under UTF are allocated towards non-sustainable transport projects like carriageway and flyover development. 

        In a Nutshell

        The substantial doubling of funding for walking and cycling projects highlights PCMC’s commitment to its NMT Policy goals. However, public transport remains underfunded with a visible shortfall of buses and a dire need for improved quality of service in the city. On the contrary, car-centric projects continue to receive disproportionately high funding. To achieve its goals, PCMC should not only increase funding for sustainable transport initiatives but also simultaneously reduce the allocations for high-value car-centric infrastructure. This can be achieved through reallocation of existing budgets towards sustainable transport projects. 

        The study also provides recommendations for a sustainable transport-focused budget, exploring innovative revenue sources like parking management, municipal bonds, national and international grants. It also emphasises the need to consistently allocate budgets for walking, cycling, and public transport projects to help PCMC maintain its status as a leader in sustainable transport in India.  

        Since presenting the findings at the Smart Cities Mission’s National Conference in January 2024, the team has also been focusing on helping cities with securing additional funding through this data-driven approach. In the next blog in the series, we’ll take a deep dive into the process of the budget analysis including methodology, limitations, and the challenges faced while conducting the study. Stay tuned! 

        Written by Donita Jose, Senior Associate Communications

        Edited and technical inputs by Rutuja Nivate, Associate- Urban Development and Pranjal Kulkarni, Programme Manager – Healthy Streets and Compact Cities