ITDP India

Promoting sustainable and equitable transportation worldwide

What Indian Cities can Learn From Chennai’s New Mobility Playbook

by

As published in The Times of India

Indian cities do not suffer from a lack of transport plans; they struggle to turn those plans into coordinated action on the ground. Over the past two decades, most large cities have articulated similar ambitions—prioritising public transport, integrating land use and mobility, improving safety, and reducing dependence on private vehicles. Yet congestion has worsened, road fatalities remain high, and private vehicle ownership continues to rise across urban India. The problem has not been a lack of vision, but the difficulty of translating that vision into aligned implementation across agencies. 

Chennai reflects this broader national challenge. The city has planned for mobility before: a Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study in 2010 and a Comprehensive Mobility Plan in 2019, both aligned with national policy priorities around public transport, non-motorised travel, and land-use integration. Yet the outcomes fell short. This pattern is familiar across urban India: mobility plans do not fail because their goals are wrong, but because the institutional conditions required to implement them are weak. 

What’s Changed This Time 

For context, Chennai’s latest Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP) for 2023–2048 must be understood in this context. It is not the city’s first attempt at mobility planning, nor does it radically depart from earlier goals. 

But the key shift is institutional. With the operationalisation of the Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA) in 2022, Chennai now has a coordinating body for transport decisions across agencies and jurisdictions—something most Indian cities still lack in practice. Mandated under the CUMTA Act, the preparation of the Comprehensive Mobility Plan is a statutory requirement, marking a move away from ad-hoc planning towards a formally instituted process. This matters because fragmented decision-making, rather than a lack of projects, has fundamentally shaped poor mobility outcomes in Indian cities. 

Planning at the Right Scale, with the Right Evidence 

The CMP reflects the scale at which Chennai’s mobility challenges now operate. While earlier plans were anchored to a smaller planning area—1,189 square kilometres, the current CMP adopts a much broader metropolitan lens, covering 5,904 square kilometres. This expanded boundary brought rapidly urbanising suburban regions into the mobility planning framework, recognising that travel patterns, commuting pressures, and infrastructure demand today extend well beyond the city core and municipal limits. 

Planning at this scale required being backed by a stronger evidence base. The CMP draws on large-scale household surveys covering over 50,000 households and approximately two lakh citizens, complemented by fifteen primary surveys on traffic, parking, road conditions, freight movement, and travel behaviour. This shifts planning away from assumptions and corridor-level fixes towards a clearer understanding of how people travel across the region. 

Additionally, the planning process was participatory from the outset. Multiple government departments responsible for roads, public transport, planning, utilities, and finance, and public stakeholders, were engaged throughout, contributing to problem framing as well as solution design. By involving these agencies and the public from the outset, the CMP seeks to build shared ownership, an essential condition for implementation that earlier mobility plans often lacked. 

Where the Real Test Lies: Governance 

If evidence and participation explain why this CMP is different in its preparation, governance will determine whether it changes outcomes. Across Indian cities, mobility failures arise from projects implemented without alignment—often cancelling out each other’s benefits. Roads are widened while bus fleets stagnate for decades; metro and rail systems are built without reliable last-mile access; and parking supply continues to expand even as public transport struggles for priority. Each decision may appear defensible in isolation, but together they undermine the city’s mobility goals. 

Chennai’s CMP is explicit about this failure—and about what must change. At the centre of this shift is the role envisaged for the CUMTA. Unlike earlier arrangements that relied on goodwill or ad-hoc coordination, CUMTA is positioned as a reviewing authority for transport and mobility proposals initiated by different departments. The intent is straightforward: major transport interventions should proceed only if they align with the metropolitan mobility vision set out in the CMP. 

This is more than a procedural adjustment. It signals a shift in how transport decisions are expected to be made. Cities that have built high-performing urban mobility systems such as London and Singapore—have done so by consolidating authority, standardising dataand design systems, and enforcing alignment across agencies through institutions like Transport for London and the Land Transport Authority. Chennai’s CMP moves in this direction through proposals for standardised right-of-way design, region-wide data systems, parking management as a demand-management tool, and the exploration of a dedicated urban transport fund. 

Early Gains and the Test Ahead

This institutional experiment is already showing signs of traction. As the CMP is being integrated with the city’s Third Master Plan, its priorities are beginning to acquire statutory force through land-use planning. This alignment has the potential to significantly strengthen implementation—anchoring mobility decisions within the city’s formal planning framework and reducing the risk of fragmented or competing interventions. 

That said, it would be premature to treat this as a settled outcome. The durability of this shift will depend on consistent enforcement of alignment, the ability to resolve inter-agency conflicts, and the extent to which the coordinating institution’s role is sustained through administrative practice over time. 

What Could Change on the Ground 

If the CMP holds through implementation, its most visible impact will be a different everyday experience for commuters. Commutes become more predictable. Public transport becomes a reliable first choice rather than a reluctant compromise. Streets acquire clearer priorities, reducing conflict between buses, pedestrians, cyclists, and private vehicles. 

For residents in the metropolitan periphery—where growth has outpaced services—the plan’s metropolitan lens is especially significant. Better alignment of suburban rail, bus services, and regional connectivity with where people live and work can reduce dependence on two-wheelers and long, expensive commutes. Safer, more legible transport systems expand access for women, older adults, and children. Businesses benefit from more reliable labour access and logistics. 

A Test Case for Indian Cities 

Chennai’s CMP does not offer a shortcut, nor does it guarantee success. What it offers is a clearer diagnosis of why mobility planning has struggled in Indian cities—and a credible attempt to address those weaknesses through governance, coordination, and evidence-led decision-making. 

The lesson here is not that cities need better plans. Most cities already have them. The lesson is that without empowered institutions, shared ownership across departments, and mechanisms to enforce alignment, even the most technically sound plans will struggle to change outcomes. Chennai has begun to test that proposition. Other Indian cities would do well to pay attention. 

About the Authors 

I. Jeyakumar, is an retired officer of the Indian Railway Traffic Service (IRTS) from the 1997 batch, has been serving on deputation to the Government of Tamil Nadu as Member Secretary, Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA) since August 2022. He has been instrumental in building the organization and driving transformative initiatives such as the Comprehensive Mobility Plan, City Logistics Plan, Journey Planner cum QR-based Integrated Ticketing System, Parking Policy and Management for Chennai, Street Design for Safe Commute to School, and several other Multimodal Integration projects.  

Aswathy Dilip is the Managing Director of ITDP India. She is a sought-after expert in raising support for sustainable mobility from key decision-makers, governments, and stakeholders. With support from her team, she works with the National, State, and City governments; providing them with technical assistance on sustainable, inclusive, and equitable urban mobility. Her work has contributed to creating streets safe for walking and cycling, implementing parking reforms, accelerating transition and building support for high-quality, sustainable mass transit. She has a degree as an urban designer from Cardiff University, UK, with a bachelor’s in architecture. 

Making Tamil Nadu’s Cities Future-Ready:  Mobility Priorities By 2031

by

Everyone talks about the future like it is all about gadgets and AI, with Robo dogs manning our cities, flying cars helping us cut the traffic at grade, and everything becoming ‘smart’ to save time.  

And while having some of these would actually make the future of cities more exciting and optimised, there is one uncomfortable truth that we can’t ignore: 
If we can’t fix the city’s mobility, by fixing the buses networks and fleet, footpaths, and the city’s air pollution — 2031 won’tfeel futuristic at all! 

And this degenerated version of future is already in play in many of our cities, where while we have summits on AI, the basic transport facilities are still tied to private vehicles and unsafe roads, forcing even the smartest minds feel humbled in front of the infrastructure. 

So, we asked a simple question: 
What does a realistic future-ready Tamil Nadu really look like? 

To answer this, it is crucial to acknowledge that transport is no longer a basic service issue for Tamil Nadu’s (TN) citizensthat simply moves people from point A to point B. It has become an issue of safety, women’s rights, and family livelihood. Increasingly, it has gone even beyond these fundamentals and become a climate issue as well, with the state’s GHG emissions growing by between 2005–2019. In major cities of TN, transport contributes up to one-third of total emissions. 

In this context, the Sustainable Mobility Network (SMN) has developed the Tamil Nadu (TN) Urban Mobility Priorities, 2031, which lists out four priority areas we wish to see addressed. These are built on the principle that safe transport and healthy cities are fundamental rights.  
 
While drafting the priority areas, the attempt was to ensure that these build on the existing schemes like TN road safety policy, TN EV Policy, Chennai parking policy, Chennai climate action plans, and CMPs, and doesn’t require for the state to reinvent the wheel. 

More and Convenient Public Transport for All!

Despite MoHUA’s recommendation of 60 buses per lakh urban population, major cities in TN operate with only 18 buses per lakh, totalling 7,909 buses across the state. To add to this, in Chennai, 50% residents lack access to a bus stop within walking distance inside the Chennai Metropolitan Area.  

Owing to this shortage of buses on the whole, even well-intended schemes like the Vidiyal Payanam scheme, which led to female ridership increasing from approximately 40%to 61.78%, has had a stunted impact. Inadequate fleet strength has led to overcrowding and long wait times for existing users, highlighting the need for more buses. 

What should be prioritised? 

First and foremost, to meet the current demand, at least 15,800 more buses are needed. This is to ensure that there is a ride for every 5-minutes by bus/ public transport in urban areas and a bus stop within 5-minute walking distance for all residents. While buses increase, it is crucial to ensure these new buses are low-floor, wheelchair friendly with ramps, automatic doors and emergency buttons. To further make it futuristic, enabling digital payments for all services, having real time passenger information and ensuring smooth transfer between various modes is crucial. 

Cleaning Up Urban Mobility

The average mode share of private vehicles is 35% in major TN cities; with Chennai Metropolitan Area alone reaching 63,413 private vehicles per lakh population! These are staggering numbers which not only leave the road networks choked with congestion, but also rapidly worsen air quality! Road transport is a major contributor to air pollution, with 4 million high-emissions vehicles in Chennai alone. This causes serious health concerns amongst citizens. 

What should be prioritised? 

When it comes to cleaning up air, every effort matters. 

Both pull and push measures. As pull measures, starting with 100% electrification of vehicles and buses in Chennai could be a start, with 50% target for other five largest cities. To further bolster cleaning up the air, ensuring smooth EV transition in private vehicles is key. For this, having one charger for every 20 EVs is crucial, along with incentivising scrapping vehicles older than 15 years.  

While EVs get promoted, disincentivising polluting vehicles is equally crucial. Here come the push factors. The state should also prioritise having a green tax on polluting vehicles along with implementation of Low Emission Zones in cities with population over 10 lakhs. 

A Pedestrian First Initiative! 

As per an analysis of Accident Data from Tamil Nadu State Transport Authority (TNSTA) and Traffic Police, 2022-2024 by ITDP IndiaIn Chennai and Coimbatore, pedestrians account for 30-50% of all road crash fatalities, highlighting the urgent need for safer streets. A school-going child in Chennai would encounter about 10 obstructions every 100 metres on a footpath, with parking being the leading contributor. The elderly and the differently-abled suffer the most. 

What should be prioritised? 

First and foremost, pedestrian- and cycle-friendly street design guidelines must be formally adopted and embedded into the Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Regulations (TNCDBR) and city masterplans. This can be the foundation of all future efforts. Next, all roads must be designed or redesigned in accordance with Indian Roads Congress codes, ensuring at least two-metre-wide, well-lit, continuous footpaths and accessible pedestrian crossings. 

Building on this foundation, speed-calmed zones should be implemented around hospitals, educational institutions, and markets to prioritise safety in high-footfall areas. There should also be a simultaneous focus on a Safe Routes to School programme, with a need to be rolled out in at least 50% of all government schools to protect children’s daily journeys. 

Finally, cities with populations above 10 lakhs must implement comprehensive parking policies and Area Level Parking Management plans to manage demand and reinforce safer, people-first streets. 

Urban Transport Planning to be Holistic and Coordinated!

Despite strong public demand for better buses and safer footpaths, nearly 70% of city budgets in Chennai, Coimbatore, and Erode are spent on flyovers and road development, which are vehicle-centric (as per a study on budgets of the three cities by ITDP India). This contradiction caters to only vehicle users, resulting in transport challenges. 

What should be prioritised? 
 
First, urban laws under the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicle Rules (TNMVR) must be strengthened to explicitly protect pedestrians, cyclists, and public transport users. 

Next, a state-level Unified Transport Authority and an Urban Transport Fund should be established, along with Gender and Policy Labs in all cities to institutionalise inclusive and evidence-based decision-making. 

With governance structures in place, at least 60% of transport budgets must be allocated to public transport, clean mobility, walking, and cycling. 

All urban projects should then be aligned with city-level Comprehensive Mobility Plans, Road Safety Plans, and Climate Action Plans to ensure coherence and long-term impact. Finally, local public meetings and community audits must be conducted through city mobility forums to ensure transparency, accountability, and continuous citizen engagement. 

Will this future become the reality? 

The future of mobility in TN can’t be limited to a gadget, or an app, or a code. 

The future is whether a child can walk to school safely. 

Whether a woman can board a bus without fear. 

Whether an elderly citizen can cross the street without risking their life. 

Whether a young professional can breathe clean air on their commute. 

And encouragingly, Tamil Nadu is beginning to act on this vision, not just in words, but in budgets. 

In Chennai, a historic Rs 200 crore allocation for Safe Routes to Schools in the 2026 city budget, covering 50 km, marks the first-ever dedicated SRTS budget. This year also marks the second consecutive year of large-scale funding (Rs 250 crore) for walking and cycling infrastructure. The city has further committed Rs 50 crore for 25 km of Non-Motorised Transport corridors, Rs 110 crore for bus terminal redevelopment through PPP, Rs 40 crore for multimodal integration at Washermenpet and Chepauk–Marina, Rs 10 crore for junction improvements, and a citywide Smart Parking Management programme across 20 locations. Institutional reforms, including the strengthened Quality Control and Project Development Department, indicate that implementation capacity is being built alongside vision. 

In Coimbatore, the FY 26–27 budget allocates Rs 60 crore to build 26 km of footpaths by converting storm water drains into usable walkways, which is a transformative shift in reclaiming space for people. This is complemented by Rs 10 crore for Safe Streets on Trichy Road, Rs 5 crore for public EV charging infrastructure at 25 locations, and funding to operationalise the Diwan Bahadur (DB) Road multi-level car park (MLCP), opening opportunities for behaviour change campaigns. 

Alongside MTC’s phased induction of e-buses, the Bus First campaign, and CUMTA’s push for unified mobility guidelines, Tamil Nadu is increasingly aligning policy, funding, and governance structures toward a people-first mobility transition. 

If Tamil Nadu continues on this path – strengthening bus fleets, cleaning the air, prioritising pedestrians, and coordinating institutions, 2031 will not just be futuristic, it will feel equitable, breathable, and safe. 

The opportunity is here. The budgets are beginning to reflect intent. Now the task is to stay the course! 

Inputs from Sanchana S, Tejesvini Ravi, AV Venugopal, Sooraj EM, Bezylal Praysingh and Donita Jose, ITDP India

How the Safety of our Children is Nudging Indian Cities to Rethink Safe Streets for All

by

In wildlife conservation, there’s a familiar problem: charismatic megafauna—the big, beautiful, crowd-pulling mammals—soak up attention and conservation efforts, while countless other species struggle to survive unnoticed. Logic tells us the most endangered species deserve priority, but emotion usually wins. Cute creatures move hearts, budgets, and policies in ways that less glamorous animals simply can’t. 

Urban transport in India suffers from the same bias. 

Flyovers—the “charismatic megafauna” of our cities

Flyovers, foot-over-bridges, and wide roads are the “charismatic megafauna” of our cities—high-visibility, headline-grabbing symbols of development and aspiration. Footpaths, signage, and pedestrian crossings are their overlooked cousins. Not  visually unappealing perhaps, but certainly less exciting, harder to champion, and rarely the first choice in infrastructure conversations. 

That’s why knowing there is demand for footpaths isn’t enough. People-centric mobility must become aspirational. It needs to be the popular narrative, the default choice, and the shared vision of how cities should move. To get there, we must focus on behaviour change of society at large—and one of the strongest catalysts for change in any society is children. 

Children don’t just represent the future; they influence the present. Some of the most successful road safety campaigns are rooted in schools because their impact extends far beyond classrooms. Children take lessons home, start conversations at the dinner table, and —most powerfully, —hold adults accountable. We may ignore posters and policies, but we rarely ignore our children. We change habits, make safer choices, and strive to be better role models for them. 

At the same time, children are among the most vulnerable users of our streets. Their physical and cognitive development limits their ability to judge speed, distance, and risk. As vehicle ownership rises and streets grow more hostile, children face increasing danger simply navigating their neighbourhoods. This makes the case for safer, child-friendly street design not just compelling, but urgent. 

If we want cities that truly work for everyone, we must start building streets that protect, empower, and prioritise our smallest citizens.  

The Rise of Safe School Zones 

It’s a widely accepted principle in urban design: when we design for the most vulnerable, we design for everyone. Yet, despite this common wisdom, our cities still lack sufficient evidence of street designs that meaningfully respond to children’s specific needs. 

Creating Safe School Zones is a critical first step in addressing this gap and the beginning of a much longer journey toward truly child-friendly streets across the city and not just the school zones. 

In Tamil Nadu, two cities have taken promising strides in this direction. Chennai and Coimbatore have announced Safe School Zone projects aimed at transforming the streets children use every day. 

In Chennai, the initiative covers two major interventions: 

Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Teynampet (2.5 km) 
A network of streets in K.K. Nagar (19.5 km) 

Together, these improvements are expected to benefit 31 schools (both private and corporation) across the city and impact nearly 4000 students from city corporation schools. 

 In Coimbatore, the projects include: 

Trichy Road and Kamarajar Road (2.5 km) 

School Streets at ten prominent locations across the city (4 km) 

These efforts will support 24 schools (both private and corporation) and impact nearly 6,300 children from city corporation schools alone. 

ITDP India has been supporting both cities in the rollout of these projects. However, from the very start, we took a slightly different approach with these two projects. We kept children and their voices at the heart of it! This is because any public project built on stakeholder consultations ensures inclusivity and democracy.  So, if we are designing streets for children, it is only natural that children themselves become part of the conversation. Yet their voices are rarely heard in urban planning unless we deliberately seek them out. Recognising this gap, we set out to design an ambitious—but fun activity created entirely for children. The goal was simple: to engage them in meaningful dialogue and understand, in their own words, what a truly safe school zone should look and feel like. 

If our streets are meant for children, then their perspectives should help shape them.  

Taking the Engagement into Classrooms 

In Chennai’s K.K. Nagar neighbourhood, six schools and 268 students came together to reimagine their everyday streets. In Coimbatore, the voices of 280 students from four schools added depth to this collective vision. These young citizens became active participants in shaping safer, more inclusive school neighbourhoods. 

Three thoughtfully designed activities were– 

Love it, Like it, Don’t Want it – My School Street Edition  

Designing My School Street
 

Map My Journey To School


Through this students reflected on their daily journeys, calling out safety concerns, moments of discomfort, and gaps in pedestrian infrastructure. The engagement culminated in an exercise where children articulated, in their own words, the design elements they wished to see on their school streets. Their responses offered a powerful qualitative lens into what truly defines a child-friendly street.  

Beyond insights, the process also produced a tangible outcome: a children-led walking route map, highlighting streets that need urgent improvement, based on the routes they walk every day. Such maps can directly inform the creation of a priority network for implementing safe school street infrastructure. 

Perhaps most striking was what children already knew. Their reflections on “good” and “bad” streets revealed a strong awareness of safety and accessibility, even if they did not know the terminology to explain them. Across both cities, their top priorities were clear: road safety and traffic management, street maintenance, and pedestrian infrastructure. Listening to them reminds us that the path to safer streets begins by seeing the city through the eyes of its youngest pedestrians. 

Seeing the success of this approach, we at ITDP India are now striving to ensure that working with children is embedded within the scope of all “Safe Streets to School” design projects. As part of this resolution, design consultants are required to conduct surveys and interviews with students to ensure that street designs are sensitive, inclusive, and scaled to the needs of young users. 

School streets or school zones envisioned through this process are places of calm and care: slow-moving traffic, interactive street edges, brightly coloured pedestrian crossings, clear and attractive wayfinding, reflectorised signage (that glow in the dark), and wide, comfortable walkways with dedicated pick-up and drop-off bays. While colours and motifs can be standardised citywide, each street is carefully contextualised to its surroundings. 

School Zones as a Planning Paradigm for the Whole City 

While school streets are daily lifelines for children, caregivers, and communities, Safe School Zones could be more than a safety intervention – they could be the strategic lens we need to reimagine truly accessible streets. When designed thoughtfully, a network of pedestrian pathways around a dense cluster of schools can do far more than serve students. It can seamlessly overlap with neighbourhood markets, bus termini, and other civic anchors, creating a walkable ecosystem that benefits everyone. 

This idea closely mirrors the promise of first- and last-mile connectivity (FLMC) to public transport. Yet, in our planning priorities, the footpath is profoundly underrated as an FLMC service. It is often sidelined in favour of the more “charismatic” mini-buses or other forms of Intermediate Public Transport, despite being the most universal and inclusive mode of access. 

Footpaths are the city’s quiet first responders—used by every road user, every day, often without notice, yet indispensable to the functioning of urban life. Investing in them, especially through the lens of Safe School Zones, is not just about mobility. It is about dignity, safety, and building cities that place people first. It may not be the most glamorous piece of infrastructure, but it is definitely the one needing collective attention and support.   

By Sanchana S, Senior Associate, ITDP India

Edited by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, ITDP India

25 Wins from 2025 that Shaped Urban Mobility

by

At ITDP India, everything we do is guided by three goals: Increase public transport ridership, electrify urban transport systems, and secure funding at scale, to make the former two goals possible.
And what’s our grand vision? People-first, low-emission cities. In 2025, every win was shaped by these three goals, and this shared vision.
Some wins may look small on their own like a humble brick: a policy here, a budget allocation there, a guideline approved. But stack them together and you start to see the city being built to enable people moving smoothly, one sustainable decision at a time. Check out our crisp listicle on 25 wins from 2025 that Shaped Urban Mobility. This captures the winning moments of everyday work towards the big picture.

Brick by Brick: 25 Milestones that Shaped Our Cities

Chennai’s First Situational Analysis Reveals What’s Wrong with the Footpaths and How to Fix Them

by

Assessments are a part of everyone’s life. Ask a student, a professional, or even a patient, almost everyone is put through a series of tests, to check whether their performance is upto the mark or not. In the same way, don’t you think our cities need a thorough assessment, once every few years? 

Assessments and analysis can help a lot, as if holding a report card up the face of city decision makers to assess what works and what doesn’t. It is with this thought that in 2023-2024, ITDP India’s team, embarked on an ambitious journey to assess and score the situation of the city’s streets and how walkable they are! 

But why assess walkability?

Walking is the most fundamental and natural mobility for most people in the city. It is a birthright for everyone to have and own, and to move, and access different parts of the city, that often gets taken for granted. 

Picture this in fact! Almost 23% of trips in Chennai are made by ‘walking’, as per the Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMP), 2023. However, walking on arterial and sub-arterial (internal) streets continues to pose a high risk for pedestrians.  

And these risks are translating into fatalities. Between 2019 and 2023, for instance, while Chennai took extraordinary measures to reduce the total number of accidents and fatalities, pedestrian fatalities still constituted a significant number. As per data assessed and analysed by ITDP India, pedestrian deaths made up 43% of all road accident deaths in Chennai. Furthermore, of all pedestrian related accidents in Chennai in 2023, 30% ended up as fatalities. This is an increase from 11% and 22%, respectively in 2019.  

The above data point is crucial to delve into given that the city adopted the Non Motorised Transport (NMT) Policy in 2014, and it followed through by developing over 170 km of footpaths on key Bus Route Roads. This begs the question; what happened to those footpaths? Are they intact? Are they being utilised as was once imagined? Do they need improvements? These are some of the questions that ITDP India’s latest study, called Situational Analysis of Chennai’s Footpaths, attempts to answer.  

What is a Situational Analysis?

A situational assessment aims to understand the current condition of infrastructure in detail, highlighting the merits and demerits of footpaths in comparison to standards. It also builds a good database of the infrastructure and develops a scoring system to prioritise streets where footpaths require immediate attention. The study in Chennai identified 14 streets across different zones of Chennai, in which 32 km of footpaths were mapped and observed, and over 1700 user perception surveys were conducted.  More importantly, this study also provides a framework to analyse the impact of this humble piece of infrastructure on its users, for the future as well.   

How was Situational Analysis done? What parameters were used?

 Every pedestrian infrastructure was viewed from three dimensions:

Design Mapping

How efficient is the design and how well it has adhered to the standards. This was done by using the MerginMaps which uses 14 performance indicators  

User Perception Survey
Gathering insights from vulnerable groups (young, elderly pedestrians, cyclists, public transport users) on footpath experience, using 8 indicators. 

Observation Surveys
Analyzing traffic volume and user behavior based on 9 indicators of optimal street usage. 

The data collected was then analysed through the lens of 4 key parameters of Healthy Streets:   

  1. Ease of Mobility – The ease with which pedestrians can walk on wide, seamless, continuous footpaths free of obstructions.  
  1. Safety—The availability of dedicated pedestrian crossing infrastructure, traffic calming elements, a buffer between carriageway and footpath, street lighting, and active property edges ensures pedestrians’ personal and physical safety.   
  1. Universal Accessibility – Inclusion of the vulnerable sections of society, such as the elderly, children, pregnant women, and persons with other physical challenges, through design.  
  1. Livability – A sense of comfort and belonging created by the presence and integration of street play, street commerce, and other socio-economic activities, in addition to providing functional footpaths.   

What were the key findings of the Situational Analysis?

The study provides insights into the importance of footpaths as well as having good footpaths to improve their usability.    

Footpath Design User PerceptionObservation Survey
Ease of Mobility & Universal Accessibility 55% of footpaths across all streets were found to be of inadequate width.  58% of those who reported that the footpaths are not walkable are women Only 40% of the pedestrians are seen walking on footpaths. Most prefer walking on the carriageway due to obstructions and inadequate design.  
40% of the total length of all streets lacked a footpath. 
 		76% of respondents found the streets had several obstructions on the footpath. On average, only 13.21% of modes of commute during peak hours on streets is walking.  
On average 10 obstructions per 100m and parking constitutes 40% of all the types of obstructions, followed by encroachments like commercial spillover, advertisements, construction debris etc. 
Safety & Livability Street lights illuminate only 61% of the streets. 
 
The total number of pedestrian crossing points provided is 50% below the required number per IRC standards. 		57% of respondents who reported having difficulty crossing the street, and who found it unsafe at night are women 
 
73% of respondents find streets unsafe to cross, and 71% of them are concerned about speeding vehicles while crossing. 		Speeds in neighbourhood-level streets are able to go as high as 60kmph. 
Speed breakers followed by pedestrian crossing points are most effective traffic calming measures observed.  
48% of all pedestrians are women, showing the need for inclusive design.  

How did individual streets perform?

To further make the analysis granular, a scoring framework was used which helped rate the performance of the footpath infrastructure across all 14 streets on all 31 indicators of performance. It also helped identify the nature of intervention required, based on varying performance:  

  1. A street with a rating of 25 or more can be improved through strict enforcement and minor repairs and interventions.   
  1. Streets rated 19 to 25 would require enforcement to remove obstructions, improve footpath surfaces, and introduce accessible crossing infrastructure.  
  1. Streets with a rating of 14 to 19 would require repairs to improve the continuity of footpaths, remove obstructions, and introduce safe midblock crossing infrastructure.  
  1. Streets with ratings below 14 should be redesigned and restructured completely. 

Here the winning street was Pedestrian Plaza, scoring a brilliant 25.71, whereas the poorest performing street was CP Ramaswamy Road scoring just 12.72 on 30.

The following inferences can be drawn from the studies, as well as the score card. 

  1. Streets prioritising pedestrians are safer, more accessible, and liveable: Pedestrian Plaza, CSIR, and Wallajah Road have exceeded basic footpath requirements, catering comprehensively to pedestrian needs. 
     
  • Pedestrian Plaza
  • Pedestrian Plaza
  • Pedestrian Plaza
  • Pedestrian Plaza
  1. Continuous and consistent footpath standards across the entire street length are crucial for ensuring ease of pedestrian mobility. Streets such as Sardar Patel Road and Peter’s Road demonstrate that design and perception scores do not align with each other.  
  • Peter’s Road
  • Peter’s Road
  • Peter’s Road
  1. Pedestrian crossings and traffic calming measures should be prioritised alongside footpath provision: Despite adequate pedestrian infrastructure, streets like Perambur High Road, Peter’s Road, and Sardar Patel Road show moderate performance.  
  • Perambur High Road
  • Perambur High Road
  • Perambur High Road
  1. In streets without formal footpaths, stormwater drains double as walking zones but lack pedestrian safety and comfort. This necessitates efficient drainage design for clear walking zones, as is evident in streets such as C.P. Ramaswamy Salai, Anna Main Road, Eldams Road, and Broadway.  
  • Eldams Road
  • Eldams Road
  • oplus_2
  1. The absence of an enforcement/O&M framework results in footpath encroachment, diminishing clear walking zones for pedestrians. Streets that perform fairly, such as Old Jail Road, Thirumalai Pillai, Gandhi Irwin, and Thiru Vi Ka High Road, illustrate this issue as they were all once refurbished under the 170km of BRR road transformation project, benefits of which did not continue due to poor maintenance. 
  • Gandhi Irwin Road
  • Gandhi Irwin Road
  • Gandhi Irwin Road
  • Gandhi Irwin Road
  • Gandhi Irwin Road

Recommendations for Chennai to improve its network of streets

Good footpaths are a win-win for all citizens. On one hand it can reduce travel costs for low-income households, on the other hand, it boosts physical health and improves inclusivity by encouraging more women, elderly, children, and vulnerable people to use public spaces. An overarching benefit for all sections is also that it lowers emissions by promoting walking and cycling and can address congestion. The results of the study helped identify key priorities to improve footpaths:  

Way Forward

An assessment is good as long as the feedback is implemented on. At ITDP India we are happy to share that the results and recommendations of the study were showcased to the city engineers. This was presented during a workshop organized by ITDP India, focusing on the significance of Healthy Street Design guidelines to enhance footpath design and usability in the city.  

Capacity Development Workshop for Bus Routes Roads Department in 2024

Since then, the Greater Chennai Corporation has committed to several initiatives aimed at strengthening pedestrian infrastructure. These initiatives include identifying new networks for footpath repairs and reconstruction, conducting audits to assess the condition of existing street infrastructure, and creating a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the operations and maintenance of the city’s footpaths. To boost these initiatives further, the state allocated a Rs 200 crore budget to build and improve over 200 km of footpaths in Chennai in 2025, which is the first dedicated budget for pedestrian infrastructure. This work is being carried out with technical assistance from ITDP India. 

It is also pertinent to note that this exercise has been replicated in multiple cities by ITDP India, showcasing a powerful methodology that can be embraced by many more.  

This isn’t just about rating pavements; it’s about reimagining streets as spaces of safety, accessibility, and shared humanity. The path ahead is clear: Chennai’s footpaths need more than repairs, the city does need to prioritise the scale-up of footpaths across the city. They demand a collective awakening—to see sidewalks not as afterthoughts, but as lifelines. The data is here. The solutions exist. Now, will we walk the talk? 

By Sanchana S, Senior Associate, ITDP India

Edited by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, ITDP India

The Best Street in Nagpur? Survey Says: It’s Wardha Road! 

by

9 minutes read time

Over the last one year, Nagpur really hit the streets, quite literally. The Nagpur Municipal Corporation, with technical support from ITDP India studied the walkability and cyclability of seven major roads covering 10 km. Over 330+ citizens were also surveyed to find the best-performing, most walkable, and cycle-friendly street in Nagpur city! 

And guess what? We found a clear winner. 

Drumroll for… Wardha Road A, the 1.3 km stretch from Ajni Square to Rahate Colony, was the clear choice of Nagpurians as the most walkable and cycle friendly street! 
 
These were the findings from Nagpur Urban Street Assessment Report, launched in July 2025.  

Why is Wardha Road A the best street in Nagpur? 

Wardha Road A scored 24.75/30 in a citywide assessment and was found to be the most walkable and cycle-friendly street in Nagpur. 

From a first glance itself, it has a mix of all things considered must have in urban design! The survey found that:  

  1. The street on both Left Hand Side (LHS) and Right Hand Side (RHS) had 86% and 88% usable footpaths offering a continuous connectivity for all walking users. 
  1. In terms of cycle track availability, both sides have 92% continuous connectivity of cycle tracks.  
  1. If this wasn’t all, it was observed nearly 100% pedestrians were using the footpath. 
  1. In terms of people’ perception of the street, Wardha Road A performed exceedingly well! 87% of the people felt walkability and cyclability improved on the street. Overall perception of safety while crossing street was also above 80%.  

Furthermore, with 55 shaded trees, 11 seats, 35 pedestrian lights, and a generous footpath of 3m wide along with 2m wide cycle tracks, this street had every Nagpurkar raving! 

Just next door, but a whole different world

To understand how individual streets have performed, let’s zoom out. Surrounding Wardha Road A are three major streets:  

  • Wardha Road B 
  • Ring Road (South/ Southwest) 
  • Central Bazaar Road (Northwest)
Snapshot of all the streets surveyed in Nagpur Urban Street Assessment

Despite being part of the same road network, their conditions tell a different story. 
Here’s how they score: 

  • Wardha Road A: 24.75 
  • Wardha Road B: 18.75 
  • Ring Road: 6.5 
  • Central Bazaar Road: 6.75 

 These numbers reflect a sharp drop in quality and accessibility of streets.

For instance: 

  • Wardha Road B, which is also redesigned alongside the Wardha Road A, scored lower on multiple fronts. In the perception surveys, while Wardha road A scored an 83% from citizens for ease of crossing, Wardha Road B scored 77%. In our observation surveys as well, Wardha road B had a whopping 249 obstructions as compared to its counterpart Wardha Road A which had just 76 obstructions. 
  • Ring Road which is barely few hundred meters from Wardha Road A also suffered from lowest scores! Our observation study spotted 199 obstructions. This road also lacked a cycle track all together, despite volume counts showing there were a whopping 160 cyclists here per hour, highest among all surveyed streets. This shows that even if a person sets out to cycle from Wardha to Ring Road, with lack of continuous footpaths, their journey will be unsafe.  
  • To the north of Wardha Road A is another street, Central Bazaar Road. In the survey the stretch from Lokmat Square to Bajajnagar Square was surveyed and we found that 100% of the pedestrians were forced to walk off the footpath, on the carriageway, in contrast with Wardha road A where continuous connectivity was possible.  

So, while Wardha Road A may be a star, the surrounding roads are failing to keep up. Moreover, if a citizen were to decide to walk or cycle from Wardha A to Wardha B, their journeys would widely differ, encouraging them to NOT choose these sustainable modes, and instead rely on personal vehicles.  

This stark contrast makes one thing clear: safe streets cannot remain isolated stretches. Walking or cycling across even adjacent roads is inconsistent and unsafe, pushing people toward personal vehicle use. 

How Did the Study Get These Insights? 

The study used a three-part approach: design surveys, observation studies, and perception surveys. 

1. Design Surveys-   Our teams hit the ground for the analysis of design features of the streets 

2. Observation Studies – Next we observed how people moved, walked, and cycled on the infrastructure. 

3. Perception Studies – Finally, we reached out to street users to understand their perception about the streets!

Key Takeaways from Nagpur Street Audit:

1. Speeds are high on Nagpur roads 

One of the striking findings of the survey was the high speeds observed on vehicles plying the streets. Be it two-wheeler or four-wheeler, the average speeds were far higher than Indian Road Congress standards. For instance, during our survey we used speed guns, and they revealed peak vehicular speeds of over 60 km/h on most roads, with some stretches (Orange City Road and Amravati Road) recording up to 75 km/h for two-wheelers. The ideal speed limit within cities should be around 30-40 kmph. Anything higher than this means that in case of a road crash, likelihood of death is high! 

This finding was echoed by citizens in their perception surveys. Fast moving vehicles was the biggest concern across all 7 seven roads when we asked them about road safety! 

2. All redesigned streets are not performing well 

While it is widely considered that having designers on board to redesign streets is a best practice, the city also needs to put in other checks and balances in place to harmonise the street design across the city. In Nagpur for instance, of the seven streets surveyed, four had been redesigned previously. Of the four, three did not perform great either in design, nor observational or the perception surveys. Amravati Road which was redesigned in 2023 has scored an overall score of 12.25 out of 30. 

Breaking down this score we find that when it came to design, only 33% and 38% of the LHS and RHS footpaths were usable. When it came to usability of cycle tracks, just 55% and 65% of footpath had usable tracks. 

In our observation surveys we also found that nearly 60% did not walk on footpaths. In terms of people’s perception as well only 45% felt walkability improved and 52% cyclability improved.  

3. Streets are not yet safe for vulnerable users of Nagpur 

A street safe for kids has low traffic speeds, safe pedestrian crossings, and ample space for walking and play, that is free from hazards and obstructions. Our surveys found that most streets lacked traffic calming features and safe pedestrian crossings, and these two issues also emerged as key issues in perception studies. 

With over 65% of respondents voicing safety concerns for children, the findings highlight a clear opportunity for the city to prioritise Safe School Zones and create streets that support safe, independent travel for young pedestrians.

4. Obstructions is a big issue 

Our observation studies across the 10kms of roads found a whopping 1958  obstructions! They were primarily of three types — vehicles parked on footpath, commercial space spillover, and vending obstruction. This made it extremely difficult for citizens to move on the streets — both to walk and cycle challenging. Infact, our perception study found that citizens were more troubled with parked vehicles on footpath than any other type of obstruction! 

5. Construction should be improved

Across the city, footpath construction quality was poor, both in terms of material chosen and implementation. Poor selection of material and workmanship has resulted in bad walking surface, and acts as a walking inhibitor. 

So, How Can Nagpur Improve its Streets?

 1. Adopt a Network Planning Approach 

Nagpur needs a comprehensive street transformation and not just  a few great streets; it needs a well-connected network. To encourage more people to walk or cycle, infrastructure must be continuous and safe from Point A to Point B. 

This thought process has numerous benefits.  

  • This can encourage more and more to shift to non-motorised modes for shorter commutes, without having to rely on personal vehicles.  
  • Apart from helping citizens who are the ultimate end users, a neighbourhood wide streets network approach helps the municipality to undertake work in a phase-wise manner.  
  • They can also dedicate annual budgets for streets by working towards a plan, onboard expert design consultants, and monitor and evaluate more effectively. 

2. Focus on school zones 

Nagpur’s streets have many students on them, accessing their schools on foot and cycle. Infact in some streets, the number of cyclists were going up to 160 cyclists in peak hours, majority of whom are captive users like students. This makes school zoning of utmost priority. In a school zone, not only is the area around the school made slower and safer, but there are various provisions like parking, signages, road markings, street furniture, etc. added to make the experience of students and the guardians who pick them better.  

Nagpur’s streets have many students on them, accessing their schools on foot and cycle. Infact in some streets, the number of cyclists were going up to 160 cyclists in peak hours, majority of whom are captive users like students. This makes school zoning of utmost priority. In a school zone, not only is the area around the school made slower and safer, but there are various provisions like parking, signages, road markings, street furniture, etc. added to make the experience of students and the guardians who pick them better.  

3. Create Urban Street Design Guidelines 

Nagpur’s current approach has been fragmented — a few successful redesigns (like Wardha Road A) sit alongside poorly built streets. To fix this, the city should adopt Urban Street Design Guidelines. 

These guidelines will further help to: 

  • Ensure there is uniformity between multiple implementing agencies like Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur Improvement Trust, Public Works Department in using standardised and robust materials. 
  • Make tendering processes simpler and uniform, and bring in better quality control with standardisation of material and rates. 

5. Adopt the right policies

Progressive policies can help a city set realistic goals and transform ideas into action. For Nagpur, this could happen by adopting a set of policies like a Nagpur Healthy Streets Policy, for starters. This policy can enshrine what the city wants to achieve in future when it comes to walking and cycling. To bolster this, a parking policy will also help Nagpur to have a clear vision on tackling its issue of haphazard parking, as the current assessment spotlights that parking encroachment is the most common form of footpath encroachment.  

Written by Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communication, with technical inputs from Siddhartha Godbole, Senior Associate, Healthy Streets
Edited by Shreesha Arondekar, Associate, Communications and Development
Pictures by Suraj Bartakke,Senior Surveyor & Admin

How Pimpri Chinchwad Bust Five Myths by Hosting Vehicle Free Days

by

As published in The Economic Times

Every time a city announces a vehicle-free day, the sceptics line up: “It’ll cause traffic chaos!” “Businesses will suffer!” “What’s the point of just one day?” Truth be told, we had our own doubts too. Would people embrace it? Would businesses struggle? Could we really pull this off without creating a logistical nightmare?

But as we experienced first-hand in Pimpri Chinchwad, the city stepped out of its comfort zone to host its first Vehicle-Free Day on the 8th and 9th of March—reclaiming Pimpri Market for people, even for just two days, proved to be a game-changer. The outcome? A very busy, bustling market street came alive with people, businesses saw more revenue, air quality improved, and residents across the city started to demand more pedestrian-friendly spaces. We didn’t need AI to reimagine what parts of the city could look like – we got a real-life glimpse. Here, we’re debunking some common myths about vehicle-free days so other cities can learn from our experience, test similar interventions that could become permanent, and build public support by making communities an integral part of the process.

Myth 1: Vehicle-free days cause traffic chaos

The truth: It just takes thoughtful planning in collaboration with all stakeholders

The success of Pimpri Chinchwad’s first vehicle-free day wasn’t accidental—it took months of planning in collaboration with various stakeholders. The city worked with its engineers, corporators, traffic police, local NGOs, PMPML, Maha Metro, and business communities to work out the details of the event including mapping out alternative routes using public transport or other sustainable modes, removing of encroachments, and ensuring smooth flow of movement for people and traffic. Collaboration and the sense of shared ownership had a huge role to play in ensuring that the city witnessed a seamless, vibrant celebration of public space, proving that streets can be more than just roads—they can be places for people. 

Myth 2: Without parking right at their doorstep, local businesses will struggle

The truth: Streets that encourage walking attract more foot traffic, boosting sales for local shops.

When the idea of a vehicle-free day was first introduced, local businesses in Pimpri Market were skeptical. Their worries were understandable—if customers couldn’t drive right up to their storefronts, would they still come? And what about parking? The notion of removing vehicles from a bustling commercial street felt risky, even radical. But the city didn’t push ahead blindly. Over several weeks, the city sat down with shopkeepers, listened to their concerns, and co-created solutions. Alternative parking zones were mapped out nearby, and extensive communication was rolled out to guide customers on how to access the market without their vehicles. The goal was to make sure access remained easy—even if it wasn’t at the doorstep. The outcome? Based on the surveys, local businesses saw a 20% increase in foot traffic and a 15% rise in first-time customers. Businesses didn’t just sustain themselves—they thrived. This also broke a very long-standing belief that businesses can’t survive without doorstep parking. Instead of a street filled with haphazardly parked vehicles, Pimpri Market saw a street filled with people.

Myth 3: One day without vehicles cannot have a significant environmental impact

The truth: Reducing vehicle emissions can significantly improve air quality, lowering PM2.5 levels and giving citizens a breath of cleaner air.

Air quality was measured during the two days, and it saw some measurable gains with a 34% reduction in PM 2.5 level, 37% reduction in PM 10 levels, and nitrogen dioxide also reduced by 41%. While these numbers may seem alien to many, the difference was felt by those breathing noticeably cleaner air. It is proof of how reducing vehicle dependency, even temporarily, can make urban air cleaner and healthier.

Myth 4: There isn’t a public demand for streets without the ease of vehicle access

The truth: The demand for more pedestrian-friendly streets continues to grow as awareness and communication increases.

Word spread fast. Thanks to an extensive outreach campaign—posters at metro stations, announcements on local radio, social media buzz, and print coverage—residents from across Pimpri Chinchwad knew exactly why the city was hosting a Vehicle-Free Day and, more importantly, how they could be part of it.

On the day itself, the excitement continued. Real-time coverage captured the energy on the streets, showing people strolling, cycling, and simply enjoying a city without cars. And the conversation didn’t stop there. Residents from neighbourhoods like Nigdi, Bhosari, and Chinchwad started asking, “When’s ours?”. 

What began as a one-street experiment turned into a citywide conversation about reclaiming public spaces. One of the bigger wins was that people didn’t just experience a vehicle-free street, they imagined what their city could look like if these changes were permanent. And that’s how a single event laid the groundwork for a much bigger shift—one that redefines how we think about our streets, the air we breathe, and our daily lives.

Myth 5: Vehicle-free days don’t contribute to long-term transport solutions

The truth: They are just the beginning. It requires the city to commit to a larger goal of transforming mobility for its citizens.

Pimpri Chinchwad’s first vehicle-free day wasn’t just a feel-good experiment—it was a blueprint for lasting change. Encouraged by this success, the city is now looking to permanently transforming Pimpri Market into a pedestrian zone that put walking, cycling, and public transport first.

Pimpri-Chinchwad is committed to transforming the way people move. Whether it’s making streets safer and more inviting for walking and cycling, ensuring public transport is clean, affordable, and readily available, or putting in place the right policies for lasting institutional reform—the city is taking bold steps. At the heart of this shift is a strong team within the municipal corporation, working to build the right systems and capacities to make these changes not just possible, but sustainable in the long run.

What’s next? 

The vehicle-free-day was just a small piece of the larger effort, but an important one. It gave people a glimpse of what’s possible—a city where streets are safer, more inviting, and designed for people, not just vehicles. More importantly, it sparked hope, showing that the municipal corporation isn’t just talking about change—it’s working to make it a reality.

It was a real-world test—could streets function without vehicles? Would businesses survive without doorstep parking? The answer was a resounding yes. Foot traffic increased, businesses thrived, and residents experienced cleaner air and safer streets firsthand. What started as a one-day event is paving the way for lasting change.

This is just the beginning. Real transformation begins with a single bold step.

Written by Shekhar Singh, IAS, Municipal Commissioner, Pimpri Chinchwad and Kashmira Dubash, Deputy Director, ITDP India

Pedalling Through Time; What it Means to Cycle in India for Different Generations

by

Cycling has long been woven into the fabric of daily life in India. Just a couple of decades ago, the cycle was an essential part of most households, getting children to school, adults to work, and everyone, everywhere in between. From the wobbly first rides of young kids to teenagers mastering wheelies, to middle-aged men cycling to theatres, to young women pedalling to their colleges, the cycle was more than just a mode of transport, it was part of growing up, working, and living. 

But as motor vehicles have come to dominate our streets, the space for cycles, both physical and social, has shrunk. Yet, across India, many continue to hold on to this two-wheeled connection. This World Bicycle Day, in this blog, we bring together stories from different corners of the country, spanning age groups, genders, and backgrounds, to understand what cycling means to people today. 

Whether it’s riding over speed bumps for the thrill, cycling for fitness or weight loss, pedalling to earn a livelihood, or simply chasing the joy of childhood, these anecdotes remind us that cycling still belongs to everyone. 

Karl Dubash, 7 years old, Chennai 

“I’m Karl and I’m 7 years old. My cycle is blue and black. I used to have a bell, but it broke. I haven’t given my cycle a name yet. I usually ride around my apartment. I go out cycling about two to three times, and mostly every evening. I like riding fast! My favourite part about cycling is going past the speed breakers and riding in a zigzag. It’s super fun!

Sometimes I go cycling with my friend Akshay in Basham. We ride all around the apartment. I also go with my mom and sister. I remember my first cycle! It was light blue and white, and it had a koala on it. I liked it right away. To learn how to ride, I watched my mom and dad and kept practising. It was a bit hard at first, but once I got my balance, I was very happy. I don’t find the roads scary because my mom doesn’t let me go on them. But yes, I think they are scary. I don’t go on the roads at all, so there aren’t any places I avoid. If I could change something to make cycling better, I would wish for cycle paths like the ones in other countries. I wish we had a few in India too!” 

Kid bikers, 7,10,11 & 15 years old, Kallakurichi

We are the kid bikers from Kallakurichi: Aadhav (7) on a dark blue and green cycle, Ashvitha (10) on a grey one, Aadhithya (11) riding blue, and Suriya Narayanan (15) on green. We’re four cousins who spent the entire summer pedaling through our town, and we think we’re the coolest cycling crew around!

What we enjoy most is exploring new roads, cycling down unfamiliar lanes and discovering more about our hometown as we go. Sometimes we even end up covering 10-30km just like that!

If you ever spot us, we ride in a neat line, like ants in a trail, one behind the other, matching each other’s speed. Well, almost! Every now and then, Aadhithya gets excited and zooms ahead when the street is clear. Infact, we even use hand signals like professional riders and also use aerodynamic techniques to speed.

Two of us (Aadhav and Ashvitha) have been cycling for over three years now. And through all our rides, one thing we keep wishing for is a dedicated cycle path, lined with shady trees to make the ride smooth and breezy. Our parents often tell us how they cycled to school with their friends, and we dream of doing the same. We’ll keep cycling no matter what, but we know many of our friends would join in if there were safe cycle tracks. We hope that wish comes true someday!

Saba Serkhel, 29 years old, Mumbai

“I’m Saba Serkhel, 29 years old. I work as a video and film editor, but when I’m not at my desk, you’ll probably find me sketching, reading or cycling. My relationship with cycling goes way back. I got my first tricycle when I was three, and by the time I was seven, I had my first proper bicycle. It was a hand-me-down from my sister—a bright pink cycle covered in flowers.

 

At the time, I wasn’t too happy with the design, but that didn’t matter. What mattered was what it gave me; my first taste of freedom. I still remember the exact moment I learnt to ride. My sister ran alongside me, holding the back of the seat, cheering me on. And then suddenly, I was flying solo. That rush, that feeling of “I can do this on my own,” has never left me. Learning to cycle remains one of my most treasured memories. 

Even now, every time I ride, I’m reminded of that moment. For me, cycling has always been more than just physical exercise, it is a return to that feeling of independence. It’s a way to break away from the noise, the traffic, and the pressure of city life. 

Living in Mumbai, that escape matters a lot. The roads are chaotic, packed with illegal parking, potholes, encroachments—and there’s little room for cyclists. But every other weekend, I carve out a slice of calm for myself by heading to Sanjay Gandhi National Park. There, I ride through shaded trails, under towering trees, past monkeys and the occasional deer. For a while, I can just breathe. That’s the kind of escape cycling gives me. 

Over the years I have cycled in other cities too like Athens in the U.S., Ahmedabad, Bilaspur, and each place brought its own vibe. Athens had proper lanes and was safe despite the hills. Ahmedabad’s wide, pothole-free roads surprised me. And Bilaspur, with its rural quiet, felt like peace on wheels. But Mumbai…Mumbai makes you work for it. You have to be stubborn to cycle here.  

My current cycle is green and black, and I call it Bill, after the long-tailed Broadbill. It’s fairly new, but like every bike I’ve ever had, it gives me the freedom and the escape, and always, a quiet reminder of a little pink bicycle, a running sister, and the first time I truly felt like I could do anything.” 

Kasim Bammanalli, 33 years old, Panaji

“I’m 33 years old and I work as a poder which is a traditional Goan breadmaker. Every day, I deliver freshly baked bread and poi from the bakery to people’s homes, cycling through the neighbourhood, carrying a basket of warm bread on my cycle. I’ve been cycling for the past 17 years. Twice a day, every day, once in the morning and then again in the evening. I follow the same familiar route. It’s a routine I’ve gotten used to, and my black cycle is always with me. 

I haven’t given it a name, but it’s like my companion now. Simple, sturdy, with a rack to hold my bread basket.Cycling isn’t something I find physically hard. My hands and legs don’t hurt. Sure, it’s a tough job, but the effort I put in is what I earn from. That’s how I look at it. As for safety on the road, there is not much I can do as I have to cycle, no matter what. Everything else is in God’s hands. Accidents happen. If someone crashes into me, it’s on them. If I hit someone, that’s my responsibility. That’s just how it is. 

For me, cycling is not about fitness or fun. It’s part of my work, my livelihood. If the cycle breaks down, our employer takes care of it. Every couple of months, they call in a maintenance person to check all the cycles and fix whatever needs fixing. People often talk about improving cycling in the city by adding dedicated cycle lanes. But why would anyone add it just for me? And can it even be added on every street? For safety, I just stick to my route. Infact, I’ve cycled through fields, on busy roads, wherever needed. If traffic gets too heavy, I pull over and wait. I just do what I have to do. 

I still remember my first cycle—it was an Atlas. Very sturdy, very reliable. Much better than the new models today.” 

Karthik, 43 years, Chennai

“I took up cycling back in 2014 when I hit 116 kg and knew I had to make a change. What started with short weekend rides of 20–25 km slowly became a serious fitness routine. Initially, I was just trying to shed weight and get healthier. But things really changed when I joined the Chennai Cyclists group in 2017. With local chapters spread across the city, it became easier to ride regularly and meet like-minded people.  

Over time, I started participating in endurance rides like 100 km, 200 km, and eventually timed long distance events upto 555km and 600km. These rides are self-supported and test your planning, time management, and resilience.  

What started as a solo fitness goal has turned into something bigger—a community, a lifestyle, and a constant learning curve. 

But cycling in a city like Chennai isn’t easy. We often ride on highways like ECR where reckless driving is a real threat. There’s no dedicated infrastructure, over speeding, and unruly traffic make every ride a risk. We try to stay safe by riding in a disciplined formation, following lane rules, and constantly looking out for each other. Still, with so many overlapping infrastructure projects and road conditions always changing, cyclists like us are left navigating a city that isn’t built for us.” 

M Nagalakshmi, 58 years, Hyderabad

“My relationship with cycling has been a lifelong one, but I only resumed cycling regularly a few years ago, probably around the time I turned 50. There wasn’t any big reason or trigger. I just felt like it was time to reconnect with the child in me. And what better way than to get back on a cycle? I still remember my very first one, it was a hand-me-down, electric blue, and I rode it to school every day. These days, I ride to work, meet friends, and even just to get out and feel the breeze on my face. 

Over the week, I usually cycle nearly 30-40 km for leisure. Apart from this, I cycle to the office, which is about 3–4 km away, unless the weather is too harsh or I’m wearing a saree. That’s where things get tricky. Most cycles today are built like sports equipment. Not very commute-friendly. Not women-friendly. Definitely not saree-friendly. Earlier, I had cycles designed in a way that it was comfortable for dresses. Now, what dominates the market are “performance bikes,” often with designs that exclude Indian women altogether. My saree gets caught in the chain. Pants get caught, too. It’s frustrating. We can’t romanticise this, as the industry is ignoring the reality of women cyclists. 

Another big issue? Wrong-side driving. In some places, two whole lanes are taken up by vehicles coming the wrong way. It’s not just inconvenient—it’s dangerous. That’s been one of the biggest changes I’ve seen in recent years. 

I really believe more people would take up cycling, like women, older adults, everyone, if cycles were actually designed for us. We need age-friendly and gender-friendly options. Something with side support, maybe even battery-powered cycles, so that riding stays fun and helps us stay mobile. And from the city’s side, we don’t need fancy cycling tracks, just better speed regulation, stricter enforcement against wrong-side driving, and maybe some traffic lights that actually prioritise cyclists.” 

By Donita Jose, Senior Associate, Communications ITDP India and Shreesha Arondekar, Associate, Development and Communications, ITDP India

How Chennai and Coimbatore City Budgets are Championing Walkable Streets

by

For years, major cities in Tamil Nadu have prioritised vehicles through budgetary allocations and infrastructure. This is despite the fact that two-thirds of all trips in the state are made by walking, cycling, or using public transport. This year, however, the tide is turning. The Tamil Nadu Budget 2025 marks a pivotal shift with Chennai and Coimbatore taking the lead, placing Non-Motorised Transport (NMT) —like walking and cycling—at the heart of mobility planning, and reimagining streets as spaces for people, not just cars. What sets this budget apart is not just the scale of funding, but the values it reflects—equity, safety, and access for all. 

While this development is a step in the right direction and is still in its nascent stages, Chennai’s strides towards creating walking and cycling friendly streets echo some of the early moves seen in cities like Singapore. Singapore has long been a role model for Southeast Asia, known for its  integrated public transport and walkable, people-friendly streets, backed by landmark investments like the 1 billion Singapore Dollars’ fund for last-mile connectivity in 2016, and forward-looking policies such as the Active Mobility Act (2017) and Multi-Modal Transport Act (2021). Anchored by the Tamil Nadu Budget 2025, which earmarks significant investments in footpaths, smart parking, and Safe Routes to School pilots, Chennai’s journey could chart a similar course—if implementation keeps pace with vision. 

A Historic Leap for Walkability in Chennai 

A landmark first – ₹200 crore dedicated funding for 170 km of footpaths in Chennai  

This year’s budget has earmarked ₹200 crore for the implementation of 170 km of high-quality footpath in Chennai. This is the largest investment for pedestrian infrastructure in the city to date, and the first time since the Non-Motorised Transport (NMT) Policy of 2014 that footpath development has received such focused financial backing. Announced by Hon’ble Minister K.N. Nehru on March 25, 2025, this move is more than just a line item in a budget—it is a powerful reaffirmation of the state’s commitment to safer, more inclusive streets for all, especially vulnerable road users including children, the elderly, and Persons with Disabilities (PwDs).  

Chennai’s journey: From marginal to meaningful investments!

Chennai’s journey toward walkable streets began with ambition. Following the adoption of its pioneering Non Motorised Transport Policy in 2014  the city saw average annual footpath investments rise to ₹72 crore, resulting in the creation of over 170 km of footpaths between 2014 and 2019—most of it funded through the Tamil Nadu Urban Road Infrastructure Fund (TURIF). During this time, the city also tapped into the Smart Cities Mission’s Area-Based Development (ABD) funds to implement the now-celebrated Pedestrian Plaza and its feeder streets in T. Nagar.    

Citizens walking safely on Pedestrian Plaza

To scale up its efforts, Chennai launched the Complete Streets program in 2020 (earlier known as “Mega Streets”) with a dedicated ₹100 crore allocation under the Chennai City Partnership with the World Bank. The project aimed to reimagine neighbourhood-level street networks by integrating underground utility upgrades and walk and cycle-friendly above-ground infrastructure. However, the first implementation phase, under progress, covers only around 11 km, leaving behind the demand for a city-wide network of functional footpaths largely unmet.   

Ongoing implementation under the Complete Streets Project at Khader Nawaz Khan Road, Nungambakkam

Analysing the budgetary spending, we found that from 2022 to 2025, Chennai’s investment in footpaths plummeted to just ₹13 crore per year on average. A modest recovery came in FY 2024–25, with ₹25 crore earmarked for 21 km of footpaths, but this was still far from enough to undo years of underinvestment.  

Source: Budget Expenditure categorised by type of work and scheme, FY 2012 – January 2025 (Bus Route Road Department)  

However, our analysis also pointed out that over all these years, road resurfacing and carriageway upgrades continued unhindered, reflecting an annual average spending of ₹84 Crores, and a consistent focus toward vehicle-centric planning.  

Source: Budget Expenditure categorised by type of work and scheme, FY 2012 – January 2025 (Bus Route Road Department)  

A renewed push: Bringing safety and equity to the forefront 

Any policy without dedicated, sustained funding is just a wish. For Chennai to become truly walkable, sustained investment and quality implementation must now follow the city’s renewed aspirations, and 2025 marks a good beginning with this significant dedicated allocation for NMT infrastructure. Analysis of spending patterns on NMT infrastructure over the last three years, reveals that footpath implementation in Chennai relied on piecemeal funding drawn from state and city-level schemes—such as the Tamil Nadu Urban Road Infrastructure Fund (TURIF) and Singara Chennai 2.0. In the absence of a dedicated budget, investments in Non-Motorised Transport (NMT) remained inconsistent and limited in scale. This year’s ₹200 crore commitment by Chennai, marks an eightfold increase over last year’s spending on walking and cycling. This signals a much-needed shift from fragmented support to focused investment.

This renewed focus on walkability couldn’t have come at a more critical time. While Chennai has made commendable progress in reducing overall road crashes, the proportion of pedestrian fatalities has seen a troubling rise from 11% in 2019 to a staggering 43% in 2023.  

Source: Road Accidents Reports (2019-2022), MoRTH & Road Accident Analysis in Tamil Nadu 2023, TNSTC  

This persistent gap between mobility patterns and infrastructure safety highlights the urgent need for course correction, which this budget begins to address. The ₹200 crore allocation is a long-overdue shift toward building streets that are shared public spaces where everyone can move freely and safely. To transform this intent into tangible impact and ensure that the budget is effectively utilised, aligned with diverse mobility initiatives, and executed on time, a dedicated coordinating agency like the Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA) is crucial.  

Bringing It All Together: CUMTA as the institutional backbone  

Much like Singapore’s shift to a car-lite city was steered by its Land Transport Authority through various institutional reforms and proactive policymaking, Chennai’s mobility transition is now gaining momentum through the leadership of the Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA). With a clear mandate to coordinate mobility efforts across the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA), CUMTA is emerging as the anchor institution for Chennai’s people-first mobility vision. 

As part of the Budget 2025, Honourable Minister for Housing & Urban Development, Thiru S. Muthusamy announced an array of progressive initiatives led by CUMTA.  

  • Building on the newly adopted Parking Policy, CUMTA will pilot Smart Parking Management in Anna Nagar, reclaiming public space and improving local access. 
  • CUMTA is also developing Comprehensive Street Design Guidelines for the entire Chennai Metropolitan Area—including Tambaram, Avadi, and Kanchipuram—to create safer, more inclusive streets across jurisdictions.  
  • Complementing this, CUMTA is also drafting the Traffic Impact Assessment Guidelines to help cities manage congestion and ensure new developments align with sustainable transport goals.  

These initiatives go hand-in-hand with Tamil Nadu’s growing investment in Non-Motorised Transport—signalling not just a shift in budget priorities, but a change in how cities are planned and governed. With institutions like CUMTA at the helm, Tamil Nadu is building long-lasting systems to realise its people-first mobility vision. 

Coimbatore Steps Up: Scaling Sustainable Mobility Initiatives 

Building on Chennai’s momentum, Coimbatore is making its own strides towards a more people-centric mobility scenario with this year’s budget embedding sustainable mobility into the city’s planning priorities. Two key initiatives are set to guide this: revising the Coimbatore Street Design Guidelines and developing a comprehensive NMT Action Plan. These tools will help the city set a strong foundation for designing safer, more inclusive streets at scale. 

Coimbatore has been grappling with concerns on road safety, with road fatalities rising over 1000 in 2023; ranking highest in the state. In addition to various other initiatives to address this, a ₹2.5 crore allocation has been announced for a Safe Routes to School pilot on Trichy High Road, covering 2.5 km of critical access routes. Together, these moves reflect Coimbatore’s growing commitment to creating well-planned, safe, walkable streets and mark a step forward in scaling sustainable mobility across Tamil Nadu. 

A Decade of Partnership: ITDP’s Ongoing Commitment 

Since 2009, ITDP in India has worked closely with the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC), Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA), and Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation to help shape their sustainable mobility vision.  

Over the years, ITDP has supported with technical research and guidance on key policies and guidelines adopted by city governments, such as the Non-Motorised Transport Policy, Parking Policy, and the Complete Streets Framework. We are also continuing to help cities build the capacity to implement them through on-ground workshops, experiential street audits, and engagements with city leaders. Our role has also included providing technical support and data-driven insights to guide decision-making and strengthen the case for healthier, more equitable streets. 

We are happy and proud to have contributed to realising these milestones and are extremely grateful for the past and present city leadership for their sustained support in championing these initiatives. 

Capacity Development Workshop for Bus Routes Roads Department in 2024

A Win Worth Celebrating—and Building On 

These announcements are worth celebrating, especially for cities like Chennai and Coimbatore, that are leading this change at the forefront. However, the real measure of success lies in how well we translate this vision and intent into long-lasting impact on the ground. 

Here are a few pointers for the city governments to make this fruitful:  

  • Chennai’s ambitious plan to implement 170 km of footpaths must be guided by a clear network planning strategy and aligned with CUMTA’s Comprehensive Mobility Plan. 
  • Bringing on board qualified technical experts and consultants will be key to ensuring street designs meet the standards laid out in the city’s adopted guidelines. 
  • Facilitating capacity building for contractors and engineers is equally important to ensure high-quality street implementation. Field engineers must closely monitor implementation quality using well-defined performance indicators to ensure accountability at every step.  
  • Cities must also embed Operations & Maintenance (O&M) systems right from the planning stage, to ensure infrastructure remains functional and safe for all users. 
  • Annually recurring budgets for NMT including dedicated budgets for O&M must be institutionalised, so cities can plan consistently and scale.  
  • One persistent challenge our cities face is siloed execution, where lack of co-ordination leads to utility works disrupting newly built footpaths and guidelines/policies exist on paper without enforcement. Addressing this will require strong inter-agency collaboration, clear mandates, and sustained leadership from institutions like CUMTA. 

Chennai and Coimbatore have taken a significant first step. Now, they must stay the course—scaling these successes across other cities of Tamil Nadu, building systems, and creating streets where walking, cycling, and shared mobility are not just possible, but preferred. 

By Varsha Vasuhe, Senior Associate, ITDP India

Edited by Kashmira Dubash, Deputy Director, ITDP India

Parking Reimagined: Chennai’s Parking Policy is Paving the Way for Better Streets

by

Commuting in Chennai’s streets often feels like a game of Would You Rather?—except that the choices aren’t fun. 

Would you rather drive in circles for 20 minutes looking for a parking spot, only to settle for an informal parking space with an arbitrary fee? Or walk on the roadside, dodging parked bikes and cars, weaving through traffic, and hoping for a safe path? 

In Chennai, these aren’t just hypothetical scenarios, with a population of 15.37 million and 9.2 million registered vehicles, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) faces a severe parking crunch as there’s nearly two vehicles for every three people in the city. A driver struggling to park in a narrow lane, while a pedestrian—with an elderly companion or child—undertaking challenging obstacles on a short 500-meter walk, dodging haphazard parking one side and speeding vehicles on another- are common scenes we all encounter. 

Sadly, neither choice makes the city easy to move around and aren’t working for anyone, just like how a would-you-rather game has no correct response. 

But can the new parking policy and on-ground parking management be the answer, that can lead to a win-win situation for everyone using the street?  
 
That’s exactly what Chennai has set course for. This year, the city took a historic step toward better parking management by launching a progressive Parking Policy for the entire 5,904 sq. km of the Chennai Metropolitan Area, which includes four corporations – Chennai, Tambaram, Avadi, Kancheepuram, 12 municipalities, 13 town panchayats, 22 panchayat unions and one special grade town panchayat. The policy was developed by the Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA), which will not only plan, design and strategise, but also oversee its implementation and monitoring. 

Since April 2022, ITDP India has been a key technical partner, supporting CUMTA in shaping this landmark policy.  

Stakeholder Meeting with GCC and GCTP in September 2022

This policy not only addresses the city’s growing parking challenges through area-level parking plans, Travel Demand Management measures, but also brought together key stakeholders—including Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC), Avadi and Tambaram Corporations, Traffic Police, Highways, and Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA)—through extensive consultations. 

CUMTA’s Parking Policy: Transforming Urban Mobility  

CUMTA’s newly adopted Parking Policy 2025 is more than just a set of regulations—it’s a transformative approach to managing limited parking space efficiently, reducing congestion, and improving mobility. Here’s a look at its key highlights of the policy: 

1. Managing parking at the area level and creating neighbourhood wide solutions, to prevent spillovers  

What does the policy say?
With the new policy, Chennai is shifting from scattered parking management in isolated streets, to a structured, Area-Level Parking (ALP) Management plan with demand-based pricing, clear regulations, and smart enforcement. The plan allocates parking spots in every street, based on the demand, and uses both ground teams and technology to manage parking efficiently across the neighbourhood. 

Why is it important? 
Managing parking in a few streets isn’t effective and can make the problem worse by causing spillover and more traffic in the adjoining streets. But when we look at a whole area and its network of streets together, we can address the neighbourhood’s need for parking more effectively. This also ensures that street space is used efficiently and is accessible to all street users. By using a demand-based pricing system, we can discourage unnecessary car/bike use and encourage people to choose more sustainable options, like public transport or cycling. 

Site Visit in Anna Nagar Chennai towards preparation of ALP (CUMTA x ITDP India x Street Matrix)

2. Prioritising Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Public Transport users, Before Parking

What the policy says? 
The policy ensures that the city agencies build safe, continuous footpaths and well-integrated NMT infrastructure. The policy gives precedence to footpath allocation over parking.  The policy ensures that parking space is allocated to a street, only after sufficient footpaths and carriageway space is available.    

Why is it important?
More than 60% of trips starts and ends on foot. Poor footpaths/no footpaths push pedestrians onto carriageways, increasing their exposure to moving vehicles and reducing safety. Presence of NMT infrastructure reduces vehicle dependence, easing parking demand, and optimising street space, ensuring safer, more inclusive streets. This way parking plans will also nudge the city agencies to ensure walkable footpath are available, leading to wider footpath coverage. 

Pedestrian Plaza at T.Nagar with On-Street Parking Management.

3. Demand-Based Dynamic Pricing and Smart Enforcement to Shape People’s Parking Behaviour 

What does the policy say?
Parking rates under the new policy will be dynamic based on the area. It will vary, by vehicle size, location of the parking spot, time of day, and demand. On-street parking will be priced higher than off-street options (government or private MLCPs, parking lots, etc.). This will nudge those wanting to park their vehicles for long term (more than 2 hours) to look for off-street options and allowing the on-street parking lots to be open for short terms users. Prepaid parking will replace postpaid models to encourage planned usage.  
As per the parking policy, enforcement measures will be taken up for the following kind of violations: double parking, parking in no-parking zone, parking on footpath, non-payment of parking fees etc. These violations will be discouraged with the use of technological interventions through sensors, cameras, etc. and on-ground parking teams. 

Why is it important?  
Pricing strategies help manage demand for parking, reduce congestion, and discourage personal vehicle user. Only those willing to pay end up coming in cars and bikes, while the rest may turn to other sustainable options.  
For example, T. Nagar, a bustling commercial area, has a higher parking charge of Rs. 60 per hour for cars, while in other areas, the charge is Rs. 20 per hour.  
In contrast, the proposed parking charges for Anna Nagar are Rs. 40 per hour. These rates have been set based on factors such as, how majority of the people commute while visiting the area, availability of public transport, land use, and considerations for traffic management. 
Enforcement strategies are an important tool for behaviour change. The focus of the policy is to not penalise the violator but discourage the violations. By adding penalties and punitive actions to the violations, people’s parking habits can be modified for the better. 

Comprehensive on-street and off-street parking fee strategy at Pedestrian Plaza at T.Nagar

4. Chennai to take a centralised approach to parking management with a Parking Management Unit (PMU) 

What does the policy say?  
The policy establishes the need for a single authority to manage parking holistically. The Parking Management Unit (PMU) will be this single authority and will function under CUMTA. It will be responsible for planning, pricing, enforcement, and implementation across agencies. 

Why is it important?  
A single authority streamlines decision-making, prevents fragmented implementation across agencies, and ensures consistency in pricing, enforcement, and monitoring. In many other cities, this was a critical reason why parking policies failed to bring the results as expected, as the implementation and enforcement were split among multiple agencies. 

5. Policy allows for Legal & Policy Amendments to other key legislations 

What does the policy say?  
For on-street parking spaces: As per the policy, Traffic Police, Urban Local Body, and Road Owning Agency can pass an official order to delegate parking responsibility and enforcement to CUMTA’s PMU. This will ensure seamless management across agencies.  
For off-street parking spaces: The policy recommends amendments to TNCDBR (Development Control Regulations of TN). This will help redefine how much off-street parking must be made provided in any property development. For example, in areas with high coverage of public transport, the overall number of permissible parking lots is reduced. This follows the concept of parking maximums, to ensure people use the public transport that is easily available and are not dependent on personal vehicles. 

Meeting at CUMTA with CEPT-CRDF (TNCDBR Consultant) in August 2023

Why is it important?
Contextualising the existing legal framework is critical for effective enforcement, regulatory clarity, and integrating parking seamlessly into urban planning frameworks.  As per the current legal framework, the parking management roles are fragmented with Traffic Police and Urban Local Bodies on planning, pricing, implementation and enforcement. The new policy allows CUMTA to take up the responsibility from different agencies and be the sole management unit- through the PMU. 

6. Parking Fee collected from the area to be re-invested back in the area 

What does the policy say?
Surplus parking revenue will be ring-fenced for local improvements, including better footpaths, cycling infrastructure, and public spaces. This approach ensures that the benefits of effective parking management are directly felt by the community, enhancing the quality of life and encouraging more sustainable modes of transport. 

Why is it important?
Unlike traditional models where parking fees is looked at as a general pool of revenue, not linked to any one location, Chennai’s Parking Policy ensures that the revenue collected is re-directed to prioritise improvements in that specific location. 
Currently, the annual parking revenue in Anna Nagar is approximately Rs. 35 lakhs. However, with effective parking management, it is estimated that this could increase to Rs. 3.3 crore per year. This is because, the current practice in Anna Nagar involves pricing per parking slot, rather than, an hourly basis, and not all streets have designated parking slots, resulting in an isolated approach. In contrast, the proposed plan adopts a cluster approach with hourly pricing, ensuring a more organised and efficient system. This revenue will be reinvested into improving Anna Nagar’s mobility, streets, green spaces, etc. 

Future-Proofing Chennai’s Streets

The policy also allows for some future-proof strategies like Urban Freight Management, EV charging integration, Travel Demand Management.

  1.   Urban Freight Management: This is a structured city-level and area-level approach to regulate the  movement of goods. This ensures dedicated loading/unloading zones are allocated on the streets  to reduce congestion and improve last-mile logistics. 
  2.  EV Charging Integration: To ensure that streets can accommodate the growing number of electric vehicles (EVs), the parking policy emphasises the need to integrate both on-street and off-street e-charging infrastructure. By planning for EV charging within parking spaces, the policy supports the shift to cleaner mobility. 
  3. Travel Demand Management (TDM): The policy also allows to create customised strategies for schools, workplaces, and commercial hubs by promoting sustainable commuting options, staggered work hours, and shared mobility to reduce peak-hour congestion.  

How will CUMTA ensure this policy is implemented well and monitored? 

Currently CUMTA has kickstarted the implementation of the policy through Area Level Plan in Anna Nagar. They will roll it out by hiring parking service providers who will manage collection of fees, enforcement etc. This will be a pilot intervention, learnings from which will inform future implementation. Since this is a technology driven parking management plan, CUMTA has also initiated the development of a parking app and a centralised command center for monitoring. The implementation of this pilot will be monitored through 14 robust Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).  

Conclusion 

Chennai’s streets, once vibrant corridors of life, now prioritise metal over people. And for years, moving through the city has felt like a never-ending game of Would You Rather?—drive in circles hunting for parking or weave through a maze of parked vehicles on foot. 

The Parking Policy changes that. It doesn’t force citizens to choose between driving and walking or taking public transport. Instead, it ensures that everyone gets their fair share of space on the road. 

This policy isn’t just a document—it’s the end of a bad game and the beginning of a better city. And that’s a milestone worth celebrating. 

By Sangami Nagarajan, Associate Urban Planning,
With Inputs from Venugopal AV, Programme Manager

Edited by Donita Jose